Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. mex. anestesiol ; 23(4): 185-191, oct.-dic. 2000. CD-ROM
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-304291

RESUMO

Antecedentes: El Síndrome de Intestino Corto (SIC) se caracteriza por diarrea, pérdida de peso y desnutrición en pacientes que sufren de algún trastorno en la motilidad o absorción intestinal o en aquellos que por diversas causas se les ha resecado más del 50 por ciento de la longitud intestinal total y que requieren de apoyo nutricio parenteral más allá de 3 meses. Hasta 1997 se habían reportado 273 casos de trasplante intestinal en el mundo, el presente reporte está relacionado con el segundo en nuestro país y el primero realizado de donador vivo relacionado. Caso clínico: Paciente masculino de 21 años de edad con SIC secundario a lesión por proyectil de arma de fuego que condicionó resección intestinal, con una longitud residual total de 10cm de intestino delgado y 55cm de colon. Se inició la preparación para trasplante intestinal con injerto de su hermana con quien compartía 3 antígenos HLA y grupo sanguíneo. Se monitorizó al paciente en forma invasiva y no invasiva. La anestesia se administró con Citrato de Fentanyl e Isoflurano en 02 al 100 por ciento. Se tomaron registros de ph, electrolitos, pruebas de coagulación, hemoglobina, hematocrito y plaquetas durante un tiempo quirúrgico y anestésico de 19 y 20 horas respectivamente. Se manejo la terapia inmunosupresora desde el período pre, trans y postanestésico. La ecolución postoperatoria inicial fue satisfactoria hasta el séptimo día en que presentó datos de lesión pulmonar aguda y muerte. Conclusión: Aunque el programa de trasplante intestinal está iniciando, ofrece una alternativa de manejo para pacientes con síndrome de intestino corto.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Transplantes , Anestesia , Síndrome do Intestino Curto/cirurgia , Transplante de Órgãos , Fentanila , Isoflurano , Anestésicos Combinados/uso terapêutico
2.
Ophthalmology ; 106(6): 1172-7, 1999 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10366088

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intraocular biodegradable polymer dexamethasone drug delivery system (DEX DDS) in treating postoperative inflammation after cataract surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel group study comparing two dose levels of the DEX DDS to concurrent placebo and no treatment control subjects. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety patients scheduled to undergo extracapsular cataract extraction with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation participated in the study. INTERVENTION: One or two DEX DDSs, each containing 60 microg of dexamethasone, were placed in the posterior chamber after cataract surgery. Patients receiving the placebo received a DDS composed of the same matrix with no active drug. In vivo rabbit studies have determined that the DEX DDS releases dexamethasone into the anterior chamber (AC) for approximately 7 to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The AC cells and the AC flare were assessed over a 60-day postoperative period using slit-lamp examination by masked observers. The number and percent of patients in each treatment group requiring additional postoperative topical anti-inflammatory medication were compared. RESULTS: Ninety patients were randomized into 4 treatment groups (30 to the 2 DEX DDS group, 30 to the 1 DEX DDS group, 15 to the placebo DDS group, and 15 to the no treatment group). The control patients required the addition of topical steroids as rescue medication more frequently and sooner than patients receiving DEX DDS (80% vs. 7% at week 2) (P < 0.001). Patients receiving DEX DDS showed a significant reduction in postoperative inflammation as assessed by the combined AC cell and flare scores when compared to the control group from day 3 (P = 0.002) through week 3. The DEX DDS was well tolerated. No clinically significant difference in any safety evaluations, including intraocular pressure, was seen between the DEX DDS-treated and control groups. CONCLUSION: The DEX DDS was safe and effective in suppressing postoperative inflammation after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Additional topical anti-inflammatory drops were not needed for most patients.


Assuntos
Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Facoemulsificação/efeitos adversos , Uveíte Anterior/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Câmara Anterior/patologia , Biodegradação Ambiental , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polímeros , Estudos Prospectivos , Segurança , Resultado do Tratamento , Uveíte Anterior/etiologia , Uveíte Anterior/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...