Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 24(4): 609-19, 1997 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9145734

RESUMO

In North America, the rate of infections following colorectal surgery decreased after the introduction of oral antibiotic bowel preparation against colonic microflora. Eight hundred eight board-certified colorectal surgeons were surveyed for their current bowel preparation practices before elective procedures. The 471 responders (58%) all use mechanical preparation: oral polyethylene glycol solution (70.9% of the respondents), oral sodium phosphate solution with or without bisacodyl (28.4%), and "traditional" methods of dietary restriction, cathartics, and enemas (28.4%). Most surgeons (86.5%) add oral and parenteral antibiotics to the regimen; 11.5% add only parenteral antibiotics, 1.1% add only oral antibiotics, and 0.9% add no antibiotics. Generally (77.8% of cases), oral neomycin and erythromycin or metronidazole are combined with a perioperative parenteral antibiotic. Most individuals start the preparation as outpatients the day before surgery, and the parenteral drugs are added to the regimen 1-2 hours before the procedure. The use of outpatient bowel preparation is increasing; however, patient selection is critical, and education is needed to reduce the rate of complications.


Assuntos
Colo/cirurgia , Cirurgia Colorretal , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Reto/cirurgia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Humanos , América do Norte , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 23(4): 237-46, 1995 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7503435

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients' blood or other potentially infectious body fluids frequently pass through surgeons' gowns in the operating room. These fluids are absorbed by the scrub suit and can directly contaminate the surgeons' skin. Protective barriers remain an important method of exposure control for many blood-borne pathogens. The efficacy of surgical gowns in preventing this passage or strikethrough has therefore become the focus of much attention. Limited data are available concerning the magnitude and duration of pressure against surgeons' gowns. METHODS: A 32-sensor mat placed in the abdominal area was used to obtain pressure data for 15 surgeons of both sexes performing 20 procedures. RESULTS: The percentage of time any pressure was detected varied from 0% during knee reconstruction to 97.4% for excision of a stomach mass. In 16 procedures, more than 87.8% of pressure contacts were 2 N/cm2 (2.9 psi or less); in addition, more than 80% of the contacts were 15 seconds or less during 13 of the procedures. No correlation was found between the amount of pressure and sex of the surgeon, surgical service, or length of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Because pressure is related to the type of procedure, gowns should be chosen to afford protection against fluid strikethrough for the pressures and blood loss anticipated.


Assuntos
Patógenos Transmitidos pelo Sangue , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Teste de Materiais/métodos , Roupa de Proteção/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Permeabilidade , Pressão , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...