Perioperative Corticosteroids Reduce Dysphagia Severity Following Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The anterior approach to the cervical spine is commonly used to treat cervical pathology. It is, however, associated with high rates of dysphagia, which may be associated with substantial patient morbidity. Perioperative corticosteroid administration has been advocated to decrease dysphagia rates; its efficacy, however, remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials to determine the efficacy of perioperative corticosteroid administration in reducing postoperative dysphagia as well as any adverse effects, such as pseudarthrosis and infection. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials], ClinicalTrials.gov) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated corticosteroids versus any comparator for prevention of postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical spine procedures. Two independent reviewers used the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria to assess eligibility and risk of bias, perform data extraction, and rate the quality of evidence. The primary outcome was severity of postoperative dysphagia. We conducted meta-analyses of dysphagia (both overall and by delivery method), pseudarthrosis, and postoperative infection. RESULTS: After screening of 927 articles, a total of 7 studies were eligible for final inclusion. These included 431 patients, of whom 247 received corticosteroids and 184 received placebo or a control treatment. Moderate-quality evidence demonstrated a significant improvement in postoperative dysphagia rates (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.63; p < 0.001), and this finding was robust to both permutation analyses and sensitivity analyses removing the studies with a high risk of bias. There was no significant difference between intravenous and local steroid administration (p = 0.16). There were no documented infections. There was no significantly increased risk of pseudarthrosis in those receiving steroids compared with placebo or a control treatment (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found moderate-quality evidence supporting the use of perioperative corticosteroid administration as an adjunct to anterior cervical spinal procedures. Patients treated with corticosteroids intravenously or locally had significantly decreased severity of dysphagia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Optimal Joint Positions for Manual Isometric Muscle Testing.

CONTEXT: Manual isometric muscle testing is a common clinical technique that is used to assess muscle strength. To provide the most accurate data for the test, the muscle being assessed should be at a length in which it produces maximum force. However there is tremendous variability in the recommended positions and joint angles used to conduct these tests, with little apparent objective data used to position the joint such that muscle force production is greatest. OBJECTIVE: To use validated anatomically and biomechanically-based musculoskeletal models to identify the optimal joint positions in which to perform manual isometric testing. DESIGN: In silico analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The joint position which produces maximum muscle force for 49 major limb and trunk muscles. RESULTS: The optimal joint position for performing a manual isometric test was determined. CONCLUSION: Using objective anatomical models that take into account the force-length properties of muscles, we identified joint positions in which net muscle force production was predicted to be maximal. This data can help health care providers to better assess muscle function when manual isometric strength tests are performed.