Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ophthalmic Res ; 49(4): 209-14, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23406657

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the success rates of two surgical methods of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) at the stage of ostium creation. In procedure 1, a Colorado needle is used to create the mucosectomy, while in procedure 2 no heated instruments are applied to the mucosa. METHODS: A total of 173 patients (218 eyes) underwent endonasal DCR between 2006 and 2009. Efficacy was assessed by a fluorescein endoscopic test at 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The success rate in group 2 was higher than in group 1 (91 vs. 81%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We have found a significant difference, which supports that a 'cold' surgical technique may be better than the use of heated instruments.


Assuntos
Dacriocistorinostomia/métodos , Ducto Nasolacrimal/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida , Intubação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteotomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...