Impact of new-onset diabetes mellitus and glycemic control on the prognosis of heart failure patients: a propensity-matched study in the community.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with heart failure (HF), and to evaluate the effect of new-onset DM and glycemic control on the prognosis of HF patients treated with a contemporary medical regimen. METHODS: Prospective study of 5314 HF patients and previously unknown DM during 9 years. Their mean age was 71.8 ± 7.9 years, 53.0% were women, and 50.2% had non-systolic HF. During a median follow-up of 56.9 ± 18.2 months, 68.9% of the patients died, 88.6% were hospitalized for HF, and 1519 (27.3%) developed new-onset DM. We propensity-matched those 1519 HF patients with DM, with 1519 HF patients non-diagnosed with DM. RESULTS: The age- and sex-adjusted incidence (per 100 HF patients/years) of DM in HF patients was 3.20, higher in women and in patients with non-systolic HF (p<0.01). Patients with HF and DM and those with a mean HbA1c>7.0% presented an increased mortality (HR of death [CI 95%]: 2.44 [1.68-3.19] and, HR: 2.56 [1.77-3.35], respectively), mainly due to an increased cardiovascular mortality (HR ≥ 2.40 [1.46-3.34]) (P<0.001). The rate of hospitalization, of 30-day readmissions, and the number of visits were higher among HF patients with DM or with HbA1c>7.0% (p<0.001). These relationships of DM and its poor metabolic control with prognosis were maintained, independently of the gender, the type of HF (systolic or, non-systolic), the comorbidities, and the medication used (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: New-onset diabetes mellitus and its poor metabolic control (HbA1c>7.0%) are associated with a increased mortality and morbidity of patients with heart failure.

Metformin therapy and prognosis of patients with heart failure and new-onset diabetes mellitus. A propensity-matched study in the community.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the commencement of metformin therapy (CMet) on the prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed heart failure (HF) and new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with a contemporary medical regimen. METHODS: Prospective study of 1519 HF patients with DM during 9 years. Mean age was 71.7+/-7.8 years, 817 (53.8%) were women, and 780 (51.3%) had preserved systolic function. During a median follow-up of 56.9+/-18.2 months, 1045 patients (68.8%) died, 1344 (88.5%) were hospitalized for worsening HF, 593 (39.0%) did not CMet, and 391 of the patients CMet (42.2%) had a mean HbA1c=<7.0%. No case of lactic acidosis due to metformin was observed. We propensity-score matched 592 patients who CMet with another 592 patients non-CMet. RESULTS: CMet was associated with a decreased mortality (HR [CI 95%]: .85 [.82-.88]), mainly due to a reduced cardiovascular mortality (HR: .78 [.74-.82]), and with a lower hospitalization rate (HR: .81 [.79-.84]). Nevertheless, CMet was not associated with an improved prognosis of HF patients with a mean HbA1c=<7.0%. These relationships of CMet with prognosis were maintained, independently of the gender, the type of HF (systolic or, non-systolic), the comorbidities, and the medication used (P<.01). CONCLUSION: Metformin therapy is associated with a reduced mortality of heart failure patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus, mainly due to a decreased cardiovascular mortality, and with a lower hospitalization rate. Nevertheless, CMet was not associated with an improved prognosis of HF patients with a mean HbA1c=<7.0%.

Incidence and mortality of heart failure: a community-based study.

BACKGROUND: Data on the incidence and mortality of heart failure (HF) in community-based populations of developed countries are limited. We estimated the trends of the incidence and, the mortality of HF. METHODS: Prospective population-based study in a white, low-middle class Mediterranean community of 267,231 inhabitants in Spain. Participants were all the patients (=>14 years), newly diagnosed with HF (4793), according to the Framingham criteria, from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2007. Main outcome were incidence and mortality following an HF diagnosis. RESULTS: Incidence of HF increased among both men and women, and among persons with systolic and non-systolic HF. Incidence of HF increased from 296 per 100,000 person-years in 2000 to 390 per 100,000 person-years in 2007 (RR 1.32, CI 95% 1.27-13.7, P<.01). Although, risk-adjusted mortality declined from 2000 to 2007, the prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed HF remains poor. In 2007, risk-adjusted 30-day, 1-year, and 4-years mortality was 12.1%, 28.8%, and 61.4%, respectively. Incidence and mortality of systolic HF were higher than those of non-systolic HF (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During the last 8 years, in a white, middle class population of the south of Europe, the increased incidence and the decreased mortality of heart failure have resulted in an increased prevalence of heart failure. Incidence and mortality of systolic heart failure were higher than those of non-systolic heart failure.

Consultation between specialists in Internal Medicine and Family Medicine improves management and prognosis of heart failure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if consultation between specialists in Internal Medicine and family doctors (CIMFD) improves the clinical management and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). DESIGN: prospective case-control study (5 years of follow-up). SETTING: community-based sample within the area of a university teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: 1857 patients (> or = 14 years) diagnosed for the first time with HF (1stDxHF), in the CIMFD. CONTROL GROUP: 1981 patients (from health centres not covered by the CIMFD), 1stDxHF, in the external consultations of the hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: mortality rate (MR). Admissions (HA). Emergency services visits (ESV). Delays in receiving specialist attention (DRSA), and the resolution of the process (DRP). Number (NTP) and delays in reporting (DTP) tests performed. Proportion (PRC) and delay (DRC) in resolving cases. RESULTS: We observed a reduction of: MR (by 10.8%, CI 95%, 8.6-13.0, p < 0.005); HA, per patient per year (ppy) (by 1.8, 1.3-2.3, p < 0.01); ESV, ppy (by 1.9, 1.2-2.6, p < 0.01); DRSA (by 26.5 days, 21.8-31.2, p < 0.001); DRP (by 21.0 days, 18.3-23.7, p < 0.001), and DRC (by 25.8 days, 20.3-31.4, p < 0.01). The PRC (17.2%, CI 95%, 15.5-18.9, p < 0.01) was higher for the CIMFD. CONCLUSION: The CIMFD approach improves prognosis and efficacy in the clinical management of patients with HF because it reduces mortality and morbidity (HA and ESV), shortens the delays in receiving care and in resolving the diagnostic and therapeutic process (DRSA, DRP, DRC), and increases the proportion of diagnosed and treated patients.

Evaluación y tratamiento de la tuberculosis latente en el adulto. Respuesta / Clinical management of latent tuberculosis. Reply

No disponible

Evaluación y tratamiento de la tuberculosis latente en el adulto / Clinical management of latent tuberculosis

No disponible