Epilepsia y gestación. Factores asociados con la presencia de crisis en la gestación / Epilepsy and pregnancy. Factors associated with epileptic seizures during pregnancy

Introducción: El manejo de la epilepsia durante la gestación requiere un control óptimo de las crisis, evitando los potenciales efectos teratogénicos del tratamiento antiepiléptico.ObjetivosDescribir las características clínicas y los resultados perinatales de las pacientes con epilepsia gestantes. Analizar los factores que se asocian a la presencia de crisis durante la gestación. Describir los fármacos antiepilépticos más utilizados y analizar los cambios en el régimen terapéutico en dos periodos: de 2000-2010 y 2011-2018.MétodosSe realizó un estudio prospectivo observacional de pacientes con epilepsia que notificaron su gestación en el periodo de 2000-2018. Se evaluó a las pacientes en el primer y segundo trimestre de gestación, tras el parto y al año. Se recogieron variables demográficas, relacionadas con la epilepsia, perinatales y obstétricas.ResultadosSe incluyeron 101 gestaciones. La edad media fue de 32,6 años, el 55,4% tenía una epilepsia focal, el 38,6% una epilepsia generalizada y el 5,9% indeterminada. Se registraron 90 nacidos vivos, nueve abortos espontáneos y cinco malformaciones congénitas, cuatro de ellas en monoterapia con valproato. En 40 gestaciones (39,6%) se registraron crisis, siendo tónico-clónicas generalizadas en 16 (40%). Las variables asociadas con la presencia de crisis durante el embarazo fueron el mal control el año previo a la gestación (66,7% vs. 15,1%, p < 0,001), el tratamiento con dos o más fármacos antiepilépticos (30% vs. 14,8% p < 0,001) y no recibir tratamiento (25% vs. 0% p < 0,001). Los fármacos antiepilépticos más utilizados en monoterapia fueron lamotrigina (n = 19, 27,1%), valproato (n = 17, 24,2%) y levetiracetam (n = 12, 17,1%). En el periodo más reciente (2011-2018) se encontró una mayor proporción de monoterapias (81,5% vs. 55,3%), además de un descenso en el uso de carbamazepina (23,1% vs. 2,3%) y valproato (30,8% vs. 20,5%); y un aumento marcado de levetiracetam (0% vs. 27,3%). (AU)

Introduction: The management of epilepsy during pregnancy requires optimal seizure control, avoiding the potential teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs.ObjectivesThis study aims to describe the clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes of pregnant patients with epilepsy; to analyse the factors associated with seizures during pregnancy; to describe the most commonly used antiepileptic drugs in these patients; and to analyse changes in treatment regimens in 2 periods, 2000-2010 and 2011-2018.MethodsWe conducted a prospective observational study of patients with epilepsy who reported their pregnancy between 2000 and 2018. Patients were evaluated in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy, after delivery, and at one year. Data were collected on demographic variables, epilepsy, and perinatal and obstetric variables.ResultsA total of 101 pregnancies were included. Patients’ mean age was 32.6 years; 55.4% had focal epilepsy, 38.6% had generalised epilepsy, and 5.9% had undetermined epilepsy. We recorded 90 live births, 9 miscarriages, and 5 cases of congenital malformations, 4 of which were born to women who received valproate monotherapy. Forty patients (39.6%) presented seizures, with 16 (40%) presenting generalised tonic-clonic seizures. The variables associated with seizures during pregnancy were poor seizure control in the year prior to pregnancy (66.7% vs. 15.1%; P < .001), treatment with 2 or more antiepileptic drugs (30% vs. 14.8%; P < .001), and untreated epilepsy (25% vs. 0%; P < .001). The antiepileptic drugs most widely used in monotherapy were lamotrigine (n = 19; 27.1%), valproate (n = 17; 24.2%), and levetiracetam (n = 12; 17.1%). In the most recent period (2011-2018), we observed a greater proportion patients receiving monotherapy (81.5%, vs. 55.3%), as well as a decrease in the use of carbamazepine (2.3%, vs. 23.1%) and valproate (20.5%, vs. 30.8%); and a marked increase in the use of levetiracetam (27.3%, vs. 0%). (AU)

The Hunter-8 Scale Prehospital Triage Workflow for Identification of Large Vessel Occlusion and Brain Haemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: The Hunter-8 prehospital stroke scale predicts large vessel occlusion in hyperacute ischemic stroke patients (LVO) at hospital admission. We wished to test its performance in the hands of paramedics as part of a prehospital triage algorithm. We aimed to determine (a) the proportion of patients identified by the Hunter-8 algorithm, receiving reperfusion therapies, (b) whether a call to stroke team improved this, and (c) performance for LVO detection using an expanded LVO definition. METHODS: A prehospital workflow combining pre-morbid functional status, time from symptom onset, and the Hunter-8 scale was implemented from July 2019. A telephone call to the stroke team was prompted for potential treatment candidates. Classic LVO was defined as a proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA-M1), terminal internal carotid artery, or tandem occlusion. Extended LVO added proximal MCA-M2 and basilar occlusions. RESULTS: From July 2019 to April 2021, there were 363 Hunter-8 activations, 320 analyzed: 181 (56.6%) had confirmed ischemic strokes, 13 (4.1%) transient ischemic attack, 91 (28.5%) stroke mimics, and 35 (10.9%) intracranial hemorrhage. Fifty-two patients (16.3%) received reperfusion therapies, 35 with Hunter-8 ≥ 8. The stroke doctor changed the final destination for 76 patients (23.7%), and five received reperfusion therapies. The AUCs for classic and extended LVO were 0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.79) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.77), respectively. CONCLUSION: The Hunter-8 workflow resulted in 28.7% of confirmed ischemic stroke patients receiving reperfusion therapies, with no secondary transfers to the comprehensive stroke center. The role of communication with stroke team needs to be further explored.

Epilepsy and pregnancy. Factors associated with epileptic seizures during pregnancy.

INTRODUCTION: The management of epilepsy during pregnancy requires optimal seizure control, avoiding the potential teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes of pregnant patients with epilepsy; to analyse the factors associated with seizures during pregnancy; to describe the most commonly used antiseizure drugs in these patients; and to analyse changes in treatment regimens in 2 periods, 2000-2010 and 2011-2018. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of patients with epilepsy who reported their pregnancy between 2000 and 2018. Patients were evaluated in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy, after delivery, and at one year. Data were collected on demographic variables, epilepsy, and perinatal and obstetric variables. RESULTS: A total of 101 pregnancies were included. Patients' mean age was 32.6 years; 55.4% had focal epilepsy, 38.6% had generalised epilepsy, and 5.9% had undetermined epilepsy. We recorded 90 live births, 9 miscarriages, and 5 cases of congenital malformations, 4 of which were born to women who received valproate monotherapy. Forty patients (39.6%) presented seizures, with 16 (40%) presenting generalised tonic-clonic seizures. The variables associated with seizures during pregnancy were poor seizure control in the year prior to pregnancy (66.7% vs 15.1%; P < .001), treatment with 2 or more antiseizure drugs (30% vs 14.8%; P < .001), and untreated epilepsy (25% vs 0%; P < .001). Antiseizure medications most widely used in monotherapy were lamotrigine (n = 19; 27.1%), valproate (n = 17; 24.2%), and levetiracetam (n = 12; 17.1%). In the most recent period (2011-2018), we observed a greater proportion of patients receiving monotherapy (81.5%, vs 55.3%), as well as a decrease in the use of carbamazepine (2.3%, vs 23.1%) and valproate (20.5%, vs 30.8%); and a marked increase in the use of levetiracetam (27.3%, vs 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The factors associated with the presence of seizures during pregnancy were previous poor seizure control, treatment with 2 or more antiseizure drugs, and lack of treatment during pregnancy. The most commonly used drugs were lamotrigine, valproate, and levetiracetam, with an increase in levetiracetam use and a decrease in valproate use being observed in the later period (2011-2018).

Role of neuroimaging before reperfusion therapy. Part 1 - IV thrombolysis - Review.

This review paper summarises the yield of the different imaging modalities in the evaluation of patients for IV thrombolysis. Non-contrast CT and CTA or brain MRI combined with MRA are the recommended sequences for the evaluation of patients within the 4.5 hours time window. Multimodal MRI (DWI/PWI), and more recently, CT perfusion, offer reliable surrogate of salvageable penumbra, the target mismatch, which is now currently used as selection criteria for revascularisation treatment in an extended time window. Those sequences may also help the physician for the management of other limited cases when the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke is difficult. Another approach the DWI/FLAIR mismatch has been proposed to identify among wake-up stroke patients those who have been experiencing an acute ischemic stroke evolving from less than 4.5hrs. Other biomarkers, such as the clot imaging on MRI and CT, help to predict the recanalisation rate after IVT, while the impact of the presence microbleeds on MRI remains to be determined.

Correction to: Features of intracranial hemorrhage in cerebral venous thrombosis.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes. The correct information is given below.

Epilepsy and pregnancy. Factors associated with epileptic seizures during pregnancy. / Epilepsia y gestación. Factores asociados con la presencia de crisis en la gestación.

INTRODUCTION: The management of epilepsy during pregnancy requires optimal seizure control, avoiding the potential teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes of pregnant patients with epilepsy; to analyse the factors associated with seizures during pregnancy; to describe the most commonly used antiepileptic drugs in these patients; and to analyse changes in treatment regimens in 2 periods, 2000-2010 and 2011-2018. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of patients with epilepsy who reported their pregnancy between 2000 and 2018. Patients were evaluated in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy, after delivery, and at one year. Data were collected on demographic variables, epilepsy, and perinatal and obstetric variables. RESULTS: A total of 101 pregnancies were included. Patients' mean age was 32.6 years; 55.4% had focal epilepsy, 38.6% had generalised epilepsy, and 5.9% had undetermined epilepsy. We recorded 90 live births, 9 miscarriages, and 5 cases of congenital malformations, 4 of which were born to women who received valproate monotherapy. Forty patients (39.6%) presented seizures, with 16 (40%) presenting generalised tonic-clonic seizures. The variables associated with seizures during pregnancy were poor seizure control in the year prior to pregnancy (66.7% vs. 15.1%; P < .001), treatment with 2 or more antiepileptic drugs (30% vs. 14.8%; P < .001), and untreated epilepsy (25% vs. 0%; P < .001). The antiepileptic drugs most widely used in monotherapy were lamotrigine (n = 19; 27.1%), valproate (n = 17; 24.2%), and levetiracetam (n = 12; 17.1%). In the most recent period (2011-2018), we observed a greater proportion patients receiving monotherapy (81.5%, vs. 55.3%), as well as a decrease in the use of carbamazepine (2.3%, vs. 23.1%) and valproate (20.5%, vs. 30.8%); and a marked increase in the use of levetiracetam (27.3%, vs. 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The factors associated with the presence of seizures during pregnancy were previous poor seizure control, treatment with 2 or more antiepileptic drugs, and lack of treatment during pregnancy. The most commonly used drugs were lamotrigine, valproate, and levetiracetam, with an increase in levetiracetam use and a decrease in valproate use being observed in the later period (2011-2018).

Captación leptomeníngea focal, un nuevo hallazgo radiológico en la seudomigraña con pleocitosis / Focal leptomeningeal uptake, a new radiological finding in pseudomigraine with pleocytosis

No disponible

Mechanical Thrombectomy Using the New ERIC Retrieval Device Is Feasible, Efficient, and Safe in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Swiss Stroke Center Experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy predominantly using stent retrievers have been shown to effectively restore cerebral blood flow and improve functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We sought to determine the safety and feasibility of mechanical thrombectomy using the new ERIC retrieval device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 36 consecutive patients from our Stroke Center registry with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with the new ERIC retriever from September 2013 to December 2014. Patients with ischemic stroke meeting the following criteria were eligible: onset-to-treatment time of ≤4.5 hours or wake-up stroke (n = 10) with relevant CT perfusion mismatch, NIHSS score of ≥4, and proof of large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation on CT angiography. We assessed the baseline characteristics including age, sex, comorbidities, stroke severity, site of vessel occlusion, presence of tissue at risk, and treatment-related parameters such as onset-to-treatment time, recanalization grade, and outcome. RESULTS: The mean age was 70 ± 13 years, and the median NIHSS score on admission was 18 (interquartile range, 10-20). Seventeen of 36 patients were on platelet inhibitors or anticoagulants before endovascular treatment (47.2%); 20 patients received intravenous thrombolysis (55.5%). The ERIC was used as the sole retriever in 28 patients (77.8%) and as a rescue device in 8. Excellent recanalization was achieved in 30/36 patients (83.3%) with TICI 3 in 19/36 and 2b in 11/36, respectively. Median procedural time in these patients was 90 minutes (interquartile range, 58-133 minutes). No intraprocedural complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, the new ERIC retrieval device was technically feasible, safe, and effective in acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion.