Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 35(6): 544-550, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36205230

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia patients characteristics at a tertiary hospital are described, and complications, mortality and associated factors are analyzed. METHODS: Data from patients with S. aureus bacteremia admitted between March 2020 and February2021 at Miguel Servet university hospital in Zaragoza were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Results showed a 14 days mortality of 24.2% and an 30 days mortality of 40%. Overall survival decreased with complications appearance [HR 3.1 (1.2-8.05)] and age over 65 years [HR 3.1 (1.4-6.6)]. The adjusted analysis showed correlation between a higher mortality at 14 and 30 days with age over 65 years [OR 6.3 (1.7-23.1)], sepsis presence [OR 19.3 (5.4-68.7)] and number of positive (+) blood cultures ≥3 [OR 5.4 (0.8-34.1)]. Mortality at 14 days was associated with sepsis presence [OR 58.2 (5.7-592.9)], number of positive (+) blood cultures ≥3 [OR 14.1 (1.1-173.7)] and an older age [OR 1.1 (1.03-1.1)]. Analyzing time to positive blood cultures ≤12 hours and number of positive blood cultures ≥ 3 at the same time, frequency of sepsis increased [30 patients (66.6%) vs 15 patients (33.3%); OR 3.4 (IC95% 1.5-8)]. CONCLUSIONS: High 14- and 30-days mortality were found, as well as a worse evolution in older age patients, with sepsis presence, and with greater number of positive blood cultures and times to positive blood cultures ≤12 h.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Idoso , Staphylococcus aureus , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/complicações , Prognóstico
2.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 35(5): 468-474, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35866373

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has been a challenge for healthcare professionals since its appearance. Staphylococcus aureus has been described as one of the main pathogens causing bacterial infections in viral pandemics. However, co- infection with S. aureus causing bacteremia in patients with COVID-19 has yet to be well studied. METHODS: We performed a e study of S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) at Hospital Miguel Servet (Zaragoza) from March 2020 to February 2021. The clinical characteristics, mortality and risk factors of adults hospitalized patients with BSA associated COVID-19 compared to patients without COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients with SAB were identified. 27.3% were positive for SARS-CoV-2. SAB represented 9.9% of bacteremia, being the second agent in frequency after E. coli. Nosocomial bacteremia was more frequent in the group of COVID-19 patients. The most frequent source of BSA in these patients was the respiratory source (26.9% vs 0%; P<0.001) followed by the skin (15.5% vs 15.9%; P=1). The development of sepsis was more frequent in COVID-19 patients (61,5% vs 7,8%; P=0,336) and among them, who received dexamethasone at doses > 6 mg/day (62.5% vs. 37.5%, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that BSA has a negative impact on the evolution of patients with COVID-19. However, further and preferably prospective studies are required to obtain solid data on the impact of BSA on coronavirus patients.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , COVID-19 , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Bacteriemia/complicações , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , COVID-19/complicações , Dexametasona , Escherichia coli , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus
3.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 222(6): 348-353, jun.- jul. 2022. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-219146

RESUMO

Introducción y objetivos La enfermedad cardiovascular sigue siendo la principal causa de mortalidad, pero se disponen de pocos datos en población joven. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue conocer la incidencia y características clínicas de la enfermedad cardiovascular prematura en nuestra área de salud. Métodos Estudio trasversal de pacientes ingresados por episodio agudo de enfermedad cardiovascular prematura en un hospital de referencia durante 2018. Resultados Se detectó a 367 sujetos: 306 (83,4%) con enfermedad cardiovascular aterosclerótica. Casi la mitad (164, 44,7%) eran diabéticos, con hipercolesterolemia primaria o alto riesgo cardiovascular, y 84 (22,9%) tenían antecedentes personales de enfermedad cardiovascular. De entre aquellos con riesgo elevado o antecedentes (n=207), solo 47 sujetos tenían colesterol LDL en objetivo terapéutico. Conclusiones La mayoría de los sujetos con enfermedad cardiovascular prematura de nuestro estudio presentaron mayor riesgo cardiovascular del atribuible a su edad. El diagnóstico y el tratamiento intensivo de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular pueden prevenir la enfermedad cardiovascular en adultos jóvenes (AU)


Introduction and objectives Cardiovascular disease continues to be the main cause of mortality, but few data are available in the young population. The aim of our study was to know the incidence and clinical characteristics of premature cardiovascular disease in our health area. Methods Cross-sectional study of patients admitted for acute episode of premature cardiovascular disease in a referral hospital during 2018. Results We detected 367 subjects: 306 (83.4%) with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Almost half (164, 44.7%) were diabetic, with primary hypercholesterolaemia or high cardiovascular risk, and 84 (22.9%) had a personal history of cardiovascular disease. Among those with elevated risk or history (n=207) only 47 subjects had LDL cholesterol at therapeutic target. Conclusions Most of the subjects with premature cardiovascular disease in our study had higher cardiovascular risk than attributable to their age. Intensive diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors may prevent cardiovascular disease in young adults (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Fatores Etários , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Diabetes Mellitus , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares
4.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 222(6): 348-353, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34154974

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease continues to be the main cause of mortality, but few data are available in the young population. The aim of our study was to know the incidence and clinical characteristics of premature cardiovascular disease in our health area. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of patients admitted for acute episode of premature cardiovascular disease in a referral hospital during 2018. RESULTS: We detected 367 subjects: 306 (83.4%) with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Almost half (164, 44.7%) were diabetic, with primary hypercholesterolaemia or high cardiovascular risk, and 84 (22.9%) had a personal history of cardiovascular disease. Among those with elevated risk or history (n = 207) only 47 subjects had LDL cholesterol at therapeutic target. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the subjects with premature cardiovascular disease in our study had higher cardiovascular risk than attributable to their age. Intensive diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors may prevent cardiovascular disease in young adults.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , LDL-Colesterol , Estudos Transversais , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
5.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 221(1): 33-44, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33998477

RESUMO

AIM: To develop consensus recommendations about good clinical practice rules for caring end-of-life patients. METHODS: A steering committee of 12 Spanish and Portuguese experts proposed 37 recommendations. A two rounds Delphi method was performed, with participation of 105 panelists including internists, other clinicians, nurses, patients, lawyers, bioethicians, health managers, politicians and journalists. We sent a questionnaire with 5 Likert-type answers for each recommendation. Strong consensus was defined when >95% answers were completely agree or >90% were agree or completely agree; and weak consensus when >90% answers were completely agree or >80% were agree or completely agree. RESULTS: The panel addressed 7 specific areas for 37 recommendations spanning: identification of patients; knowledge of the disease, values and preferences of the patient; information; patient's needs; support and care; palliative sedation, and after death care. CONCLUSIONS: The panel formulated and provided the rationale for recommendations on good clinical practice rules for caring end-of-life patients.


Assuntos
Consenso , Medicina Interna , Sociedades Médicas , Assistência Terminal/normas , Comitês Consultivos/organização & administração , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Portugal , Espanha
6.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 221(1): 33-44, ene. 2021. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-225675

RESUMO

Objetivo Establecer recomendaciones de consenso sobre normas de buena práctica clínica en la atención a los pacientes al final de la vida. Métodos Un comité de 12 expertos españoles y portugueses propuso 37 recomendaciones. Se realizó un Proceso Delphi a dos rondas, con participación de 105 panelistas incluyendo internistas, otros médicos clínicos, enfermeras, enfermos, juristas, expertos en bioética, gestores sanitarios, políticos y periodistas. Para cada recomendación se envió un cuestionario con cinco respuestas tipo Likert. Se definió consenso fuerte cuando > 95% de las respuestas estaban totalmente de acuerdo o > 90% estaban de acuerdo y totalmente de acuerdo; consenso débil cuando > 90% estaban totalmente de acuerdo o > 80% estaban de acuerdo y totalmente de acuerdo. Resultados El panel abordó siete áreas específicas con 37 recomendaciones que abarcaban: Identificación de los pacientes; Conocimiento, valores y preferencias del paciente; Información; Necesidades del paciente; Atención y cuidados; Sedación paliativa y Atención tras la muerte. Conclusiones Un Proceso Delphi con participación multidisciplinar ha permitido establecer normas de buena práctica clínica en la atención al final de la vida con consenso de enfermos, agentes sociales y profesionales sanitarios (AU)


Aim To develop consensus recommendations about good clinical practice rules for caring end-of-life patients. Methods A steering committee of 12 Spanish and Portuguese experts proposed 37 recommendations. A two rounds Delphi method was performed, with participation of 105 panelists including internists, other clinicians, nurses, patients, lawyers, bioethicians, health managers, politicians and journalists. We sent a questionnaire with 5 Likert-type answers for each recommendation. Strong consensus was defined when > 95% answers were completely agree or > 90% were agree or completely agree; and weak consensus when > 90% answers were completely agree or > 80% were agree or completely agree. Results The panel addressed 7 specific areas for 37 recommendations spanning: identification of patients; knowledge of the disease, values and preferences of the patient; information; patient's needs; support and care; palliative sedation, and after death care Conclusions The panel formulated and provided the rationale for recommendations on good clinical practice rules for caring end-of-life patients (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/normas , Sociedades Médicas , Medicina Interna , Portugal , Espanha
7.
Rev Clin Esp ; 2020 Jun 10.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32534804

RESUMO

AIM: To develop consensus recommendations about good clinical practice rules for caring end-of-life patients. METHODS: A steering committee of 12 Spanish and Portuguese experts proposed 37 recommendations. A two rounds Delphi method was performed, with participation of 105 panelists including internists, other clinicians, nurses, patients, lawyers, bioethicians, health managers, politicians and journalists. We sent a questionnaire with 5 Likert-type answers for each recommendation. Strong consensus was defined when > 95% answers were completely agree or > 90% were agree or completely agree; and weak consensus when > 90% answers were completely agree or > 80% were agree or completely agree. RESULTS: The panel addressed 7 specific areas for 37 recommendations spanning: identification of patients; knowledge of the disease, values and preferences of the patient; information; patient's needs; support and care; palliative sedation, and after death care. CONCLUSIONS: The panel formulated and provided the rationale for recommendations on good clinical practice rules for caring end-of-life patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...