Reverse TAR may be added when necessary in open preperitoneal repair of lateral incisional hernias: a retrospective multicentric cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The best approach for lateral incisional hernia is not known. Posterior component separation (reverse TAR) offers the possibility of using the retromuscular space for medial extension of the challenging preperitoneal plane. The aim of our multicenter study was to compare the operative and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) using two open surgical techniques from the lateral approach: a totally preperitoneal vs a reverse TAR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed since 2012 to 2020. Patients with lateral incisional hernia treated through a lateral approach were identified from a prospectively maintained multicenter database. Reverse TAR was added when the preperitoneal plane could not be safely dissected. The results obtained using these two lateral approaches were compared, including short- and long-term complications, as well as PROMs, using the specific tool EuraHSQoL. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were identified. Reverse TAR was performed in 33 patients and lateral retromuscular preperitoneal approach in 28 patients. Both groups were comparable in terms of sociodemographic and comorbidities variables. Surgical site occurrences occurred in 13 cases (21.3%), with 8 patients (13.1%) requiring procedural intervention. During a median follow-up of 34 months, no incisional hernia recurrence was registered. There was a case (1.6%) of symptomatic bulging that required reoperation. Also 12 patients (19.7%) presented an asymptomatic bulging. No statistically significant difference was identified in the complications and PROMs between the two procedures. CONCLUSION: The open lateral retromuscular reconstruction using very large meshes that reach the midline has excellent long-term results with acceptable postoperative complications, including PROMs. A reverse TAR may be added, when necessary, without increasing complications and obtaining similar long-term results.

Is Surgery for Hepatic Echinococcosis Appropriate in a Low-Volume Center?

Background: Cystic echinococcosis is a parasitic disease that develops in endemic areas due to the transmission of Echinococcus granulosus. The liver is the organ most affected. The most frequent symptoms include pain, palpable mass, jaundice, and fever. Diagnosis is based on epidemiologic history, examination, imaging, and serologic tests. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with hepatic echinococcosis diagnosed in our center. We collected data from our patients regarding personal history, cyst characteristics, surgery performed, and post-operative complications. Results: Sixteen patients were diagnosed with hepatic echinococcosis, 11 of whom underwent surgery. We found multiple cysts in six patients (37.5%) and a single cyst in 10 (62.5%). In 14 patients the cysts were found only in the right hepatic lobe (87.5%) and in two patients they were found in both lobes (12.5%). Segment 4 was affected in seven cases. The sizes ranged from 2.7 to 20 cm. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was prior to surgery in five patients. The interventions performed were partial cyst-pericystectomies in eight patients, a total cyst-pericystectomy in one case, and drains were placed in two cases of rupture. Post-operative fistulas were evident in five patients, four of which were closed. The fifth, which occurred after emergency surgery for rupture of the cyst, has maintained suppuration. The mean follow-up was 3.5 years. There was no post-operative mortality or recurrence to date. Conclusions: We can state that center without highly specialized hepato-biliary surgery units can assume the surgery of hydatid liver cysts excluding those with well-defined characteristics. The establishment of recommendations for the referral of patients with complex hydatid cysts may help in the optimal management of this pathology.

[Retroperitoneal sarcomas. Report of five new cases and review of the current situation]. / Sarcomas retroperitoneales. Aportación de cinco nuevos casos y revisión de la situación actual.

INTRODUCTION: Soft-tissue sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors arising from the mesenchymal cells of the connective tissue. Approximately 15% of these tumors arise in the retroperitoneum. These neoplasms are locally aggressive and the only curative treatment is surgical resection "en-bloc". The main cause of mortality is locoregional recurrence. Five-year survival is 3-58%, depending on the histologic subtype and grade. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Over a 5-year period (2001 to 2006), we performed surgery in five patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas. The mean age was 59 years (range, 46-76) with a male-to-female ratio of 3:2. The most frequent signs were abdominal pain and the appearance of a mass. In 2 patients, an incidental diagnosis was made during the surgical intervention. RESULTS: Surgical resection was performed in 5 patients but was incomplete in two patients. We removed 2 liposarcomas, 1 leiomyosarcoma, 1 chondrosarcoma and 1 fusocellular sarcoma arising in the kidney. Locoregional recurrence occurred in four patients, requiring between 1 and 2 new relaparotomies (using the retroperitoneal approach in 2 patients). There was one death. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors, in which the only common factor is the anatomical location. New randomized, prospective, multicenter trials are required to apply different therapeutic options according to the subtype of retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Sarcomas retroperitoneales. Aportación de cinco nuevos casos y revisión de la situación actual / Retroperitoneal sarcomas. Report of five new cases and review of the current situation

Introducción. Los sarcomas constituyen un grupo muy heterogéneo de tumores infrecuentes que se originan a partir de las células mesenquimales localizadas en el tejido conectivo. De éstos, el 15% es de localización retroperitoneal. Son tumores localmente agresivos cuyo único tratamiento curativo es la resección quirúrgica en bloque con márgenes libres. La principal causa de muerte es la recidiva locorregional. La supervivencia a los 5 años es de un 3-58%, y la evolución varía según el subtipo histológico y el grado de diferenciación del sarcoma. Pacientes y método. Desde 2001 hasta 2006, hemos operado 5 sarcomas retroperitoneales. La media de edad fue de 59 (46-76) años, con una proporción varones:mujeres de 3:2. El dolor y la masa abdominal fueron los signos iniciales más frecuentes. En 2 casos el diagnóstico se realizó incidentalmente en el acto quirúrgico. Resultados. Los 5 casos fueron resecados, si bien fue incompleta en 2. Resecamos 2 liposarcomas, 1 leiomiosarcoma, 1 condrosarcoma y 1 sarcoma fusocelular de origen renal; 4 pacientes refirieron recidiva local y precisaron entre 1 y 2 nuevas resecciones con intención curativa (en esa ocasión realizamos un abordaje retroperitoneal en 2 casos). Registramos una muerte. Conclusiones. Los sarcomas retroperitoneales constituyen un grupo muy heterogéneo de tumores que tienen como único dato común la localización. Creemos que deberían llevarse a cabo estudios prospectivos aleatorizados y multicéntricos para aplicar criterios terapéuticos distintos según el subtipo de sarcoma retroperitoneal (AU)

Introduction: Soft-tissue sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors arising from the mesenchymal cells of the connective tissue. Approximately 15% of these tumors arise in the retroperitoneum. These neoplasms are locally aggressive and the only curative treatment is surgical resection "en-bloc". The main cause of mortality is locoregional recurrence. Five-year survival is 3-58%, depending on the histologic subtype and grade. Patients and method. Over a 5-year period (2001 to 2006), we performed surgery in five patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas. The mean age was 59 years (range, 46-76) with a male-to-female ratio of 3:2. The most frequent signs were abdominal pain and the appearance of a mass. In 2 patients, an incidental diagnosis was made during the surgical intervention. Results. Surgical resection was performed in 5 patients but was incomplete in two patients. We removed 2 liposarcomas, 1 leiomyosarcoma, 1 chondrosarcoma and 1 fusocellular sarcoma arising in the kidney. Locoregional recurrence occurred in four patients, requiring between 1 and 2 new relaparotomies (using the retroperitoneal approach in 2 patients). There was one death. Conclusions. Retroperitoneal sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors, in which the only common factor is the anatomical location. New randomized, prospective, multicenter trials are required to apply different therapeutic options according to the subtype of retroperitoneal sarcoma (AU)