Sulfonylurea for improving neurological features in neonatal diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVE: In monogenic diabetes due to KCNJ11 and ABCC8 mutations that impair KATP- channel function, sulfonylureas improve long-term glycemic control. Although KATP channels are extensively expressed in the brain, the effect of sulfonylureas on neurological function has varied widely. We evaluated published evidence about potential effects of sulfonylureas on neurological features, especially epilepsy, cognition, motor function and muscular tone, visuo-motor integration, and attention deficits in children and adults with KCNJ11 and ABCC8-related neonatal-onset diabetes mellitus. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of the literature (PROSPERO, CRD42021254782), including individual-patient data, according to PRISMA, using RevMan software. We also graded the level of evidence. RESULTS: We selected 34 of 776 publications. The evaluation of global neurological function before and after sulfonylurea (glibenclamide) treatment in 114 patients yielded a risk difference (RD) of 58% (95%CI, 43%-74%; I2  = 54%) overall and 73% (95%CI, 32%-113%; I2  = 0%) in the subgroup younger than 4 years; the level of evidence was moderate and high, respectively. EEG studies of epilepsy showed a RD of 56% (95%CI, 23%-89%; I2  = 34%) in patients with KCNJ11 mutations, with a high quality of evidence. For hypotonia and motor function, the RDs were 90% (95%CI, 69%-111%; I2  = 0%) and 73% (95%CI, 35%-111%; I2  = 0%), respectively, with a high level of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Glibenclamide significantly improved neurological abnormalities in patients with neonatal-onset diabetes due to KCNJ11 or ABCC8 mutations. Hypotonia was the symptom that responded best. Earlier treatment initiation was associated with greater benefits.

Neonatal diabetes due to potassium channel mutation: Response to sulfonylurea according to the genotype.

OBJECTIVE: A precision medicine approach is used to improve treatment of patients with monogenic diabetes. Herein, we searched SU efficiency according to the genotype-phenotype correlation, dosage used, and side effects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Systematic review conducted according the PRISMA control criteria identifying relevant studies evaluating the in vivo and in vitro sensitivity of ATP-dependent potassium channels according to the characteristics of genetic mutation. RESULTS: Hundred and three selected articles with complete data in 502 cases in whom 413 (82.3%) had mutations in KCNJ11 (#64) and 89 in ABCC8 (# 56). Successful transfer from insulin to SU was achieved in 91% and 86.5% patients, respectively, at a mean age of 36.5 months (0-63 years). Among patients with KCNJ11 and ABCC8 mutations 64 and 46 were associated with constant success, 5 and 5 to constant failure, and 10 and 4 to variable degrees of reported success rate, respectively. The glibenclamide dosage required for each genotype ranged from 0.017 to 2.8 mg/kg/day. Comparing both the in vivo and in vitro susceptibility results, some mutations appear more sensitive than others to sulfonylurea treatment. Side effects were reported in 17/103 of the included articles: mild gastrointestinal symptoms and hypoglycaemia were the most common. One premature patient had an ulcerative necrotizing enterocolitis which association with SU is difficult to ascertain. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfonylureas are an effective treatment for monogenic diabetes due to KCNJ11 and ABCC8 genes mutations. The success of the treatment is conditioned by differences in pharmacogenetics, younger age, pharmacokinetics, compliance, and maximal dose used.

Successful off-label sulfonylurea treatment of neonatal diabetes mellitus due to chromosome 6 abnormalities.

Chromosome 6 abnormalities such as paternal uniparental isodisomy, paternal 6q24 duplication, and maternal DMR (differentially methylated region) hypomethylation are a common cause of transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (TNDM). Oral sulfonylurea (SU) is used off-label to treat permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus owing to potassium channel mutation but has not been evaluated in TNDM. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SU therapy in chromosome 6-related TNDM. Description of 3 case reports and literature review was the subject of the study. SU therapy was successful in 2 patients (initiated during neonatal life in 1 patient and during relapse in the other) but failed in the other despite the use of high dosage. The literature review identified 11 cases of patients with chromosome 6-related TNDM treated with SU, including 4 treated before remission and 7 after the relapse. SU therapy was consistently effective, although 4 patients treated after the relapse required multiple oral medications. None of the patients needed associated insulin therapy. No side effects of SU or complications of diabetes were reported. SU seems effective and safe in chromosome 6-related TNDM treatment when used to treat the initial episode of diabetes or the relapse. It improves patients' and families' quality of life. SU is available only as oral tablets. A pediatric dosage form would facilitate the treatment of neonates and infants.