Reproducibility of retardation measurements with the nerve fiber analyzer II.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of a scanning laser polarimeter, the Nerve Fiber Analyzer II (NFA II, Laser Diagnostic Technologies, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.). METHODS: Five independent retardation maps of the peripapillary retina of five normal eyes were acquired by three experienced operators (including V.S.G.) on each of three separate days for a total of 45 retardation maps per patient. Two methods of image processing, one using a baseline image and another using the individual scans, were used to compare the reproducibility of three summary measures, average retardation, integral, and retardation ratio. RESULTS: The average standard deviation (and its 95% confidence interval) of average retardation within a 10-pixel-width-band of the 9 baseline images was 0.43 degree (0.36-0.51 degree) with a mean coefficient of variation of 4.2% (3.8-4.5%). In a random effects model, each of the three retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) summary measures varied significantly by patient (p < 0.016), but not by operator (p > 0.19), or operator by patient interaction (p > 0.524). In addition, there was small, but statistically significant day-by-operator-within-patient (intraobserver) variation in the random effects model. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the NFA II provides reproducible measurements and that, on average, measurements obtained by separate operators on different days are similar.

Association between quantitative nerve fiber layer measurement and visual field loss in glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between quantitative nerve fiber layer measurements and visual field loss in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: Quantitative retinal nerve fiber layer measurements were obtained in 53 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma by using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cross-section area) and confocal scanning laser polarimetry (retardation ratio). For each eye, three images were obtained with each instrument. An image that was the mean of those three was created and used in all analyses. We investigated the association between global, regional, and hemifield differences in retinal nerve fiber layer measurements and visual field loss with linear regression techniques. RESULTS: The retardation ratio decreased with increasing mean visual field loss, measured both globally and regionally; R2 (the amount of variation explained by the model) ranged from 8% to 21%. Retinal nerve fiber layer cross-section area was not significantly associated with global measures of visual field loss. The inferior visual field mean deviation increased with decreasing superior retinal nerve fiber layer cross-section area (R2 = 8.2%, P = .04); superior visual field mean deviation was not associated with inferior retinal nerve fiber layer cross-section area (R2 = 2.6%, P = .25). Hemifield differences in visual field mean deviation increased with increasing hemifield differences in retinal nerve fiber layer cross-section area (R2 = 20.0%, P < .001), but not with retardation ratio (R2 = 0.9%, P = .48). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative measures of the retinal nerve fiber layer using both confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and confocal scanning laser polarimetry were correlated with visual field loss in glaucoma patients.