P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Recent studies have shown similar safety and efficacy of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor (P2Y12i) monotherapy when compared with standard DAPT. However, the optimal DAPT duration and regimen in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention is still unclear. Online databases were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating P2Y12i monotherapy after short DAPT (≤3 months) versus standard DAPT (≥12 months) in ACS patients. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target-vessel revascularization, and major bleeding. Random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Six randomized controlled trials with a total of 23,884 patients (n = 11,904 P2Y12i monotherapy, n = 11,980 standard DAPT) were included. Compared with standard DAPT, P2Y12i monotherapy after short DAPT was associated with similar odds of all-cause death (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.12, p = 0.26) and cardiovascular death (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.29, p = 0.29) at 1 year. Similarly, there were no significant differences in rates of myocardial infarction (OR 1.09, 0.83 to 1.43, p = 0.53), stent thrombosis (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.67, p = 0.70) and target-vessel revascularization (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.01, p = 0.07) between the P2Y12i monotherapy and standard DAPT arms. The P2Y12i monotherapy group had significantly lower major bleeding (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.64, p < 0.001) when compared with standard DAPT. In conclusion, in patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, P2Y12i monotherapy after short DAPT significantly reduces bleeding without increasing ischemic risk when compared with standard DAPT therapy.

Cardiovascular Outcomes With Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin in Patients Without Diabetes.

Although the cardiovascular (CV) benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are well known, their effects in patients without DM continue to be explored. We provide a meta-analysis of the available evidence. Online databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT2i to placebo/control in patients without DM. The end points of interest were composite CV death/hospitalization for heart failure (HF) with individual components, all-cause death, major adverse CV events, and serious adverse events. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of SGLT2i. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated through a random-effects model. A total of 6 RCTs with 12,984 patients (6,501 in the SGLT2i group and 6,483 in the placebo group) were included, followed over a mean duration of 17.7 months. Four RCTs had patients with HF, 1 with chronic kidney disease, and 1 with myocardial infarction. The mean age was 64 years, 72% of patients were men and mean hemoglobin A1C was 5.7%. As compared with a placebo, SGLT2i treatment was associated with significant reduction in composite CV death or hospitalization for HF (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.87, p <0.0001), primarily because of a decrease in hospitalization for HF (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81, p <0.00001). No significant differences were found pertaining to CV death (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.01, p = 0.06), all-cause death (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.11, p = 0.29) and major adverse CV events (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.32, p = 0.75). Serious adverse events were lower with use of empagliflozin vs placebo. In conclusion, this study shows significant CV benefits in terms of reduction in CV death or hospitalization for HF in patients without DM treated with SGLT2i as compared with placebo. The underlying heterogeneity of patients in terms of co-morbidities (HF, chronic kidney disease, or myocardial infarction) needs to be considered while interpreting the results.

Safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular events in overweight or obese non-diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown variable cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in overweight or obese patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) who are treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) vs. placebo. We conducted a meta-analysis of the available studies. METHODS: Online databases were searched for RCTs comparing GLP-1 RA to placebo in overweight or obese non-diabetic patients. The clinical endpoints of interest were major adverse CV events (MACE), CV death, all cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, revascularization, total adverse events and their subtypes. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 10 RCTs with 29,325 patients (n = 16,900 GLP-1 RA, n = 12,425 placebo) were included. The mean age was 48 years and 34 % of patients were men. As compared with placebo, the GLP-1 RA group was associated with significant reduction of MACE (OR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.71-0.89, p < 0.0001), all cause death (OR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.70-0.92, p = 0.002), MI (OR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.61-0.85, p = 0.0001) and revascularization (OR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.67-0.86, p < 0.0001), without any differences in CV death or stroke. Total adverse events, gastrointestinal and gallbladder-related disorders were higher in the GLP-1 RA group, with a similar rate of renal adverse events, malignant neoplasms and acute pancreatitis to placebo. CONCLUSION: In overweight or obese patients without DM, patients treated with GLP-1 RAs had significantly reduced MACE, all cause death, MI and revascularization when compared with placebo.

Meta-analysis of immediate complete vs staged complete revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown varying results between immediate and staged complete percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and multivessel disease (MVD). We conducted a meta-analysis to reconcile the findings. METHODS: Online databases were searched for RCTs comparing immediate vs staged complete PCI in patients presenting with ACS. The outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular death, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization (TVR), cerebrovascular events, bleeding and acute kidney injury (AKI)/contrast induced nephropathy (CIN). Risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Nine RCTs with a total of 3637 patients - 1821 in the immediate PCI group and 1816 in the staged PCI group, were included. The mean age was 64 years, 78 % of patients were men and the mean duration of follow up was 1 year. As compared with staged complete PCI, the immediate PCI group was associated with significant reduction of MI (RR 0.53, 95 % CI 0.36-0.77) and TVR (RR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.53-0.90). The risks of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, MACE, cerebrovascular events, stent thrombosis, bleeding and AKI/CIN were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In ACS patients selected for complete revascularization strategy, multivessel PCI during the index procedure may be associated with significant reduction in the risk of MI and TVR without harm when compared with a staged PCI strategy.

Oxygen Targets After Cardiac Arrest: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Optimal oxygen saturation target in patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest is unknown. Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing restrictive oxygen therapy with liberal therapy have shown conflicting results. STUDY QUESTION: We performed a meta-analysis of available RCTs to consolidate the contrasting findings regarding the oxygen targets after cardiac arrest. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases for RCTs comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen targets in patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest. STUDY DESIGN: End points of interest were mortality, unfavorable neurological outcomes, and rearrests. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Eight RCTs with 1641 patients (restrictive n = 833, liberal n = 808) were included in the analysis. The oxygen targets were defined by either saturation, partial pressure (PaO2), or supplementation rates. The mean age and male percentage were 63 years and 80%, respectively. There was no significant difference observed in the 2 groups for overall mortality (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.75-1.10, P = 0.33), unfavorable neurological outcomes (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.74-1.18, P = 0.56), and rearrests (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.22-1.98, P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this meta-analysis shows no significant difference in mortality, unfavorable neurological outcomes, and rearrests when using restrictive or liberal oxygen targets in patients after cardiac arrest. The limitations in the newer trials should be kept in mind while interpreting the overall results.

Role of Intravascular Imaging in Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Intravascular imaging (IVI) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. However, data is limited in complex PCI and the adoption remains low. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of all available randomized controlled trials comparing IVI with conventional angiography in patients who underwent complex PCI. The primary outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization. Random-effects model was used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 10 randomized controlled trials comprising 6,368 patients with 3,452 in the IVI group and 2,916 in the angiography group were included. The mean duration of follow up was 2 years, mean age was 65 years and 73% of patients were men. As compared with PCI with routine angiography, the IVI-guided PCI group had significantly lower risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.75, p <0.00001), stent thrombosis (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.92, p = 0.02), cardiovascular deaths (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.68, p = 0.0001), target lesion revascularization (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.78, p <0.0001) and target vessel revascularization (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.80, p = 0.0003). All-cause deaths and MI were similar in the 2 groups. In conclusion, among patients who underwent complex PCI, IVI reduces adverse events, importantly stent thrombosis and repeat revascularizations, compared with angiography alone guided PCI.

Effect of Furosemide Versus Torsemide on Hospitalizations and Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Loop diuretics are essential in the treatment of patients with heart failure (HF) who develop congestion. Furosemide is the most commonly used diuretic; however, some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown varying results associated with torsemide and furosemide in terms of hospitalizations and mortality. We performed an updated meta-analysis of currently available RCTs comparing furosemide and torsemide to see if there is any difference in clinical outcomes in patients treated with these loop diuretics. PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched for RCTs comparing the outcomes in patients with HF treated with furosemide versus torsemide. The primary end points included all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalizations, cardiovascular-related hospitalizations, and HF-related hospitalizations. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 10 RCTs with 4,127 patients (2,088 in the furosemide group and 2,039 in the torsemide group) were included in this analysis. A total of 56% of the patients were men and the mean age was 68 years. No significant difference was noted in all-cause mortality between the furosemide and torsemide groups (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.15, p = 0.70); however, patients treated with furosemide compared with torsemide had higher risks of cardiovascular hospitalizations (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.65, p = 0.001), HF-related hospitalizations (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.24, p = 0.001), and all-cause hospitalizations (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11, p = 0.02). In conclusion, patients with HF treated with torsemide have a reduced risk of hospitalizations compared with those treated with furosemide, without any difference in mortality. These data indicate that torsemide may be a better choice to treat patients with HF.

Renal denervation in hypertension: An updated meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency or ultrasound renal denervation (RDN) has shown conflicting results when used as an adjunctive option for hypertension management in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched Pubmed, MEDLINE, and other online databases for RCTs comparing RDN versus sham-control procedures in patients with uncontrolled or resistant hypertension. The endpoints of interest were 24-h ambulatory (AMB) blood pressure (BP), daytime AMB BP, and office BP. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis using the inverse variance method to estimate mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Nine studies with 1643 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean follow-up was 5 months. As compared with the sham-controlled group, RDN was associated with a significant decrease in 24-h AMB BP (systolic [MD -4.20; 95% CI -5.36 to -3.03; p < 0.00001], diastolic [-2.38; -3.42 to -1.35]), and daytime AMB BP (systolic: -5.11; -6.75 to -3.47, diastolic: -2.88; -3.91 to -1.85). Similarly, office BP was reduced with RDN (systolic: -5.46; -7.12 to -3.81; diastolic: -3.17; -4.23 to -2.12) when compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis shows that RDN is associated with a significant reduction in the 24-h AMB BP, daytime AMB BP, and office BP.

Safety and Effectiveness of Adjunctive Posterior Wall Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

As the atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence rate remains high after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), additional left atrial posterior wall isolation (PWI) has been studied in randomized controlled trials, however, the results are conflicting. We performed an updated meta-analysis by searching online databases for the randomized controlled trials comparing the PWI + PVI group to the PVI alone group in patients with AF. The outcomes of interest were AF recurrence, all atrial arrhythmia recurrence, and atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using a random effects model. A total of 1,612 patients, with 807 in the PWI + PVI group and 805 in the PVI alone group were included. The mean age was 60 (9) years, 75% were men and 71% had persistent AF. The PWI + PVI group had lower AF recurrence as compared with the PVI alone group (25% vs 32%, RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.96, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in all atrial arrhythmia recurrence (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.04, p = 0.16), atrial flutter/AT recurrence (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.55, p = 0.19) or adverse event rates in the 2 groups (36 vs 31; RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.77, p = 0.73). In conclusion, adjunctive PWI in addition to PVI can be achieved with lower AF recurrence but with a nonsignificant increase in atrial flutter/AT recurrence, resulting in an overall similar rate of all atrial arrhythmia recurrence without increasing the risk of adverse events, when compared with PVI alone strategy.

Effect of Vaccination on COVID-19 Severity and Outcome: A Comparative Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Vaccination is an important aspect of preventing/decreasing the severity of any viral disease including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2). This disease being very new in the experience of mankind has very little data on the effect of vaccination on the severity of this disease. We conducted this study with the primary objective to assess the severity and clinical outcome of COVID-19 infections among nonvaccinated and vaccinated individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a hospital-based retrospective cohort study including all individuals developing microbiologically confirmed COVID-19 over 5 months from February to 31st July 2021. A questionnaire was used to acquire demographic details, history of vaccination with dates, severity of COVID-19 infection, comorbidities, and outcome. Patients found positive microbiologically for SARS-CoV-2 before any dose of its vaccine were considered nonvaccinated, while patients developing SARS-CoV-2 infection even after a single dose or both doses of vaccine were considered "vaccinated." The outcome and mortality among the vaccinated and nonvaccinated patients were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The study included 2,879 patients, but complete data were obtained only from 1,500 patients. A total of 1,500 patients were analyzed, out of which 880 are male and 620 are female. The severity of the disease was categorized into mild, moderate, and severe in the age-group of <60 years and >60 years with urban (1051, 70.07%) and rural (449, 29.93%) populations. A total number of recovered patients (n = 245), died patients (n = 215) in the age-group of >60 years while the total recovered patients (n = 823) and dead patients (n = 217) in the age-group <60 years with p = 0.001. Total vaccinated patients in the age-group >60 years (n = 204) and not vaccinated (n = 256) while in the age-group of <60 years total vaccinated n = 229 and not vaccinated n = 811. The outcome of disease in the age-group of >60 years in nonvaccinated 50% recovered and 50% died during the course of illness while in the vaccinated 57.3% recoverd and 42% died p-value 0.14, while in the age-group of <60 years recovery in nonvaccinated 77.6% and death in nonvaccinated was 27.32% while in vaccinated patients 82.28% were recovered and 15% died with significant p-value 0.04. Disease outcome was not found significantly associated with a number of doses with p-values of 0.84 and 0.507 in the age-group of >60 years and <60 years, respectively. A total number of 56 patients received Covaxin and 377 patients received Covishield and disease outcome was not found significantly associated with the type of vaccine. CONCLUSION: Vaccination against COVID-19 was significantly effective in terms of hospitalization and disease severity. Vaccinated persons were less among patients with COVID-19 hospitalization and with severe disease progressing to death. These findings indicate vaccination is helpful in reducing the development of severe COVID-19 infection as compared to nonvaccinated status.

Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy for 1-3 months after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration and regimen in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using current generation drug eluting stents (DES) is still unclear. AIMS: To compare the safety and efficacy of short-term DAPT (S-DAPT) with longer duration DAPT (l-DAPT) after contemporary PCI. METHODS: We searched for studies comparing S-DAPT (≤3 months) followed by single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor against L-DAPT (6-12 months) after PCI with current generation DES. Primary end-points of interest were major bleeding and stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs (n = 48,946) were included in the primary analysis. Major bleeding was significantly lower with S-DAPT (n = 24,424) (odd ratio [OR 0.65; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.52-0.80]) compared with L-DAPT (n = 24,486). There were no differences in ST between the two groups [OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.97-1.63]. There were no significant differences in risks of all-cause death, cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction between S-DAPT and L-DAPT groups. In a subgroup analysis, there was borderline significantly higher ST with 1 month S-DAPT [1.39; 1.0-1.92], but not with 3 months S-DAPT [1.07; 0.70-1.64], when compared to L-DAPT. Finally, there were no significant treatment interactions observed when trials using SAPT with aspirin were compared with those using P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing current generation DES implantation, S-DAPT for 1-3 months reduces major bleeding without an increase in ischemic events compared with L-DAPT. Three months S-DAPT might provide a better risk-benefit profile based on current analysis. Further study is needed to define the SAPT of choice after 1-3 months DAPT.

Dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stents in high bleeding risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) is not fully defined. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of short-term DAPT (S-DAPT) with longer duration DAPT (L-DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug eluting stents (DES) in patients at HBR. METHODS: We searched for studies comparing S-DAPT (≤3 months) followed by aspirin or P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy against L-DAPT (6-12 months) after PCI in HBR patients. Primary end points of interest were major bleeding and myocardial infarction (MI). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Six randomized trials and 3 propensity-matched studies (n = 16,848) were included in the primary analysis. Compared with L-DAPT (n = 8,422), major bleeding was lower with S-DAPT (n = 8,426) [OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51-0.89] whereas MI did not differ significantly between the 2 groups [1.16; 0.94-1.44]. There were no significant differences in risks of death, stroke or stent thrombosis (ST) between S-DAPT and L-DAPT groups. These findings were consistent when propensity-matched studies were analysed separately. Finally, there was a numerically higher, albeit statistically non-significant, ST in the S-DAPT arm of patients without an indication for OAC [1.98; 0.86-4.58]. CONCLUSIONS: Among HBR patients undergoing current generation DES implantation, S-DAPT reduces bleeding without an increased risk of death or MI compared with L-DAPT. More research is needed to (1) evaluate risks of late ST after 1 to 3 months DAPT among patients with high ischemic and bleeding risks, (2) defining the SAPT of choice after 1 to 3 months DAPT.

Prothrombotic Milieu, Thrombotic Events and Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Hospitalized COVID-19 Positive Patients: A Review.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although initial reports concentrated on severe respiratory illness, emerging literature has indicated a substantially elevated risk of thromboembolic events in patients with COVID-19 disease. Pro-inflammatory cytokine release has been linked to endothelial dysfunction and activation of coagulation pathways, as evident by elevated D-dimer levels and deranged coagulation parameters. Both macrovascular and microvascular thromboses have been described in observational cohort and post-mortem studies. Concurrently, preliminary data have suggested the role of therapeutic anticoagulation in preventing major thromboembolic complications in moderately but not critically ill patients. However, pending results from randomized controlled trials, clear guidance is lacking regarding the intensity and duration of anticoagulation in such patients. Herein, we review the existing evidence on incidence and pathophysiology of COVID-19 related thromboembolic complications and guide anticoagulation therapy based on current literature and societal consensus statements.

Acute Flaccid Quadriparesis Because of a Rare Systemic Cause.

Sjogren's syndrome is a chronic slowly progressive autoimmune disease characterized by lymphocytic infiltration of exocrine glands resulting in xerostomia and dry eyes. The syndrome has wide clinical spectrum from organ specific exocrionopathy to systemic manifestation. The disease can present alone or with other autoimmune diseases like RA, SLE, Scleroderma, autoimmune thyroid disease etc. Prevalence of primary Sjogren's is 0.5-1% and of secondary Sjogren's is 5-20%. Renal involvement is rare and can either be tubulointerstial or glomerular. Based on biopsy reports in the available literature, tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) is the most common histological abnormality, followed by glomerulonephritis as a distant second.1 Distal Renal tubular Acidosis is the most common manifestation of TIN. We report a case of a 35 year female with acute onset motor weakness (quadriparesis) with hypokalemia with NAGMA with distal RTA. Patient was diagnosed with Secondary Sjogren's and managed accordingly.

Left ventricular mural thrombi with multisystem thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 and myocardial injury: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications have been reported in patients with Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-related severe respiratory distress syndrome. Although myocarditis associated with COVID-19 pneumonia has been described, evidence of left ventricular (LV) mural thrombi with other multisystem events has not been reported. CASE SUMMARY: We report two cases with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and myocardial injury with large LV thrombi and other multisystem thrombotic events. The first patient represents an unusual case of large LV apical thrombus without concordant regional wall motion abnormality and mildly reduced LV function. A subsequent inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was likely related to either an embolic event or in situ coronary thrombosis. We could not ascertain whether the acute right ventricular dysfunction was due to in situ pulmonary thrombosis or inferior STEMI. The catastrophic cerebrovascular accident was likely an embolic phenomenon. Similarly, the second patient demonstrated multiple large pedunculated thrombi occupying one-third of the LV cavity with moderately reduced LV function. A segmental pulmonary embolism was diagnosed on computed tomography chest, confirming multiple territories of in situ thrombosis. DISCUSSION: COVID-19-related inflammatory cytokine release has been linked to activation of coagulation pathways. Marked elevation of ferritin and C-reactive protein levels in both patients were consistent with evidence of a hyperinflammatory state with 'cytokine storm'. Furthermore, the finding of elevated D-dimer levels lends support to the altered coagulation cascade that plausibly explains the multisystem thrombosis observed in our patients. The direct viral endothelial involvement and subsequent endothelial dysfunction may play an important role in the development of thrombosis in different vascular beds, as seen in our patients.

Meta-Analysis of Anticoagulation Therapy for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains a major cause of morbidity and future cardiovascular events despite advancement in the surgical interventions and optimal medical therapy. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation (AC) therapy for reducing cardiovascular and limb events in patients with PAD. PUBMED, Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched through 2020 for randomized clinical trials comparing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and risk of major bleeding (MB), between AC and standard of care (SOC) therapy, among patients with PAD. Meta-analysis was performed using weighted pooled absolute risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and fixed effects model for overall and sub-groups of full dose (FD) and low dose (LD) AC therapies. Amongst 17,684 patients from 7 different studies, the addition of AC to SOC therapy was associated with MACE reduction (RD -0.022, 95% CI -0.033 to -0.012, p <0.001) and increased MB (RD 0.02, 95% CI 0.014 to 0.025, p <0.001). For FD, MACE reduction was (RD -0.021, 95% CI -0.042 to 0.001, p = 0.061) and MB (RD 0.036, 95% CI 0.025 to 0.047, p <0.001). For LD, MACE reduction was (RD -0.023, 95% CI -0.035 to -0.011, p <0.001) and MB (RD 0.011, 95% CI 0.005 to 0.017, p <0.001). In conclusion, addition of AC to the current SOC therapy can mitigate future MACE events in patients with PAD albeit at risk of increased bleeding. LD AC is associated with an efficacy/safety net benefit compared to FD AC therapy.

Drug-eluting Stents Versus Bare-metal Stents for Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With Longer Follow-up.

Randomized controlled trials comparing drug eluting stents (DES) with bare-metal stents (BMS) for saphenous vein graft (SVG) interventions have shown conflicting results. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the cumulative evidence for long-term efficacy and safety of DES vs BMS in SVG lesions. A systematic search was conducted of Randomized controlled trials comparing DES vs BMS in patients undergoing percutaneous interventions for SVG lesions. End-points of interest were all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization at longest available follow-up. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals for individual end-points. Seven studies with 1639 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean follow-up period was 32 months. Compared with BMS, DES was associated with similar risks of all-cause death (risk ratio 1.06; 95% confidence intervals 0.76-1.48) and cardiac death (0.95; 0.59-1.54). Similarly, there were no differences between DES and BMS in terms of myocardial infarction (0.81; 0.50-1.29), target vessel revascularization (0.73; 0.48-1.110 or target lesion revascularization (1.05; 0.76-1.43). Current analysis suggests no strong evidence for routine DES use in patients undergoing SVG intervention. Future studies should evaluate if SVG lesion characteristics could influence these results.

Long-term follow-up of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the long-term outcomes of PCI compared to CABG in patients with LMCAD. BACKGROUND: Recent data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has raised concerns regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for published RCTs comparing PCI using stenting with CABG in patients with LMCAD. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines were used for the present study. End-points of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeat revascularization at longest available follow-up. Relevant data were collected and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated using random-effects model. RESULTS: Five RCTs including a total of 4,499 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean duration of follow-up was 96 months. The risks of all-cause mortality [OR 1.09 (95% CI 0.88-1.34)] and cardiovascular mortality [1.14 (0.88-1.47)] were comparable between PCI and CABG. There were no statistically significant differences between PCI and CABG for MI [1.52 (0.98-2.37)] and stroke [0.84 (0.48-1.45)]. Conversely, repeat revascularization was significantly higher with PCI as compared with CABG [1.82 (1.49-2.22)]. CONCLUSION: At long-term follow-up, PCI is associated with similar risks of mortality but a higher risk of repeat revascularization compared with CABG in LMCAD. Long-term risk of MI with PCI compared to CABG needs to be further explored in future studies.