Comparison of the performance of the CRUSADE, ACUITY-HORIZONS, and ACTION bleeding risk scores in STEMI undergoing primary PCI: insights from a cohort of 1391 patients.

AIMS: To compare the performance of the CRUSADE, ACUITY-HORIZONS, and ACTION risk models in the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). METHODS: We studied all consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI at our institution between 2006 and 2010 (n=1391). The CRUSADE, ACUITY-HORIZONS, and ACTION risk scores were calculated based on the patients' clinical characteristics. The occurrence of in-hospital major bleeding (defined as the composite of intracranial or intraocular bleeding, access site haemorrhage requiring intervention, reduction in haemoglobin ≥4 g/dl without or ≥3g/dl with overt bleeding source, reoperation for bleeding, or blood transfusion) reached 9.8%. Calibration and discrimination of the three risk models were evaluated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the C-statistic, respectively. We compared the predictive accuracy of the risk scores by the DeLong non-parametric test. RESULTS: Calibration of the three risk scores was adequate, given the non-significant results of Hosmer-Lemeshow test for the three risk models. Discrimination of CRUSADE, ACUITY-HORIZONS, and ACTION models was good (C-statistic 0.77, 0.70, and 0.78, respectively). The CRUSADE and ACTION risk scores had a greater predictive accuracy than the ACUITY-HORIZONS risk model (z=3.89, p-value=0.0001 and z=3.51, p-value=0.0004, respectively). There was no significant difference between the CRUSADE and ACTION models (z=0.63, p=0.531). CONCLUSIONS: The CRUSADE, ACUITY-HORIZONS, and ACTION scores are useful tools for the risk stratification of bleeding in STEMI treated by PPCI. Our findings favour the CRUSADE and ACTION risk models over the ACUITY-HORIZONS risk score.

Percutaneous coronary interventions and bypass surgery in patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a major impediment to long-term survival after heart transplantation (HT). Limited data exist regarding the impact of coronary revascularization in these patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of revascularization procedures in patients with CAV compared with patients who did not undergo revascularization. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 249 patients who underwent HT at our center between June 1998 and December 2009 and who were examined by coronary angiography after HT. We included patients with moderate or severe CAV according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) nomenclature to evaluated outcomes after revascularization or diagnostic angiography. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprised death, acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization, admission because of heart failure not due to an acute rejection episode, and cardiac retransplantation. RESULTS: Moderate or severe CAV was detected in 43 patients. Twelve (27.9%) underwent coronary revascularization: eight percutaneous interventions and four bypass surgeries. Indications for revascularization were symptomatic ischemia or noninvasive evidence of ischemia (n = 6, 14.0%) or high-risk asymptomatic CAV (n = 6; 14.0%), namely, lesions located in the left main or proximal anterior descending arteries or multivessel disease with left ventricular dysfunction. The remaining 31 (72.1%), who did not undergo revascularization showed an absence of ischemia during exercise echocardiography (n = 11; 25.6%) or diffuse disease not amenable to revascularization (n = 20; 46.5%). During a mean follow-up of 3.0 ± 2.4 years, MACE occurred in three revascularized patients (25.0%), in one with absence of stress-induced ischemia (9.1%) and in 13 with nonrevascularizable disease (65%; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Revascularization procedures were effective in HT patients with evidence of ischemia or high-risk CAV. Patients with absence of stress-induced ischemia have a good prognosis without revascularization. On the other hand, diffuse nonrevascularizable CAV is associated with a poor prognosis.

Cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus infection and disease after heart transplantation in the last decade: effect of preemptive therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Infection by cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major concern in solid organ transplant (SOT). It increases morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of CMV asymptomatic infection and disease is variable among centers, partially related to immunosuppressive protocols and therapeutic strategies to treat CMV. Induction therapy with basiliximab is associated with fewer CMV infections than therapy with OKT3. In our center, universal prophylaxis is used in the first month post-heart transplant (HT) and preemptive therapy (PET) is used later, according to viral load monitoring. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the short- and long-term incidence of CMV infection and disease post-HT according to CMV status of recipient (R)/donor (D) in a cohort of patients who received induction therapy with basiliximab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 201 consecutive patients over 18 years of age who underwent HT between February 2001 (when induction therapy with basiliximab was initiated) and June 2011. Patients were divided in two risk subgroups of developing CMV disease: high-risk (D+/R- or D-/R- who received blood transfusions or R-, or donor with unknown serostatus) and low-risk (any other combination). RESULTS: Of 201 patients (mean age 53.81 ± 11.61 years, 81.1% men). 165 patients were classified in the low-risk and 36 in the high-risk group. The cumulative incidence of asymptomatic CMV infection during the first year post-HT was 47%: 46% in the low-risk and 50% in the high-risk group (P = .668). The incidence of CMV disease during the first year post-HT was 7.5%: 3.6% in the low-risk versus 25% in the high-risk group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, asymptomatic CMV infection after HT is frequent, affecting almost 50% of patients. However, the incidence of CMV disease is very low (7.5%), which confirms the effectiveness of PET. The higher incidence of disease in the high-risk group recommends closer monitoring of viral load in these patients or performing more prolonged universal prophylaxis.