Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(17)2023 Sep 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37686682

RESUMO

Immunotherapy improves the survival of patients with advanced melanoma, 40% of whom become long-term responders. However, not all patients respond to immunotherapy. Further knowledge of the processes involved in the response and resistance to immunotherapy is still needed. In this study, clinical paraffin samples from fifty-two advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 inhibitors were assessed via high-throughput proteomics and RNA-seq. The obtained proteomics and transcriptomics data were analyzed using multi-omics network analyses based on probabilistic graphical models to identify those biological processes involved in the response to immunotherapy. Additionally, proteins related to overall survival were studied. The activity of the node formed by the proteins involved in protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum and antigen presentation machinery was higher in responders compared to non-responders; the activity of the immune and inflammatory response node was also higher in those with complete or partial responses. A predictor for overall survival based on two proteins (AMBP and PDSM5) was defined. In summary, the response to anti-PD-1 therapy in advanced melanoma is related to protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum, and also to genes involved in the immune and inflammatory responses. Finally, a two-protein predictor can define survival in advanced disease. The molecular characterization of the mechanisms involved in the response and resistance to immunotherapy in melanoma leads the way to establishing therapeutic alternatives for patients who will not respond to this treatment.

2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(1)2023 Jan 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36614248

RESUMO

Immunotherapy based on anti-PD1 antibodies has improved the outcome of advanced melanoma. However, prediction of response to immunotherapy remains an unmet need in the field. Tumor PD-L1 expression, mutational burden, gene profiles and microbiome profiles have been proposed as potential markers but are not used in clinical practice. Probabilistic graphical models and classificatory algorithms were used to classify melanoma tumor samples from a TCGA cohort. A cohort of patients with advanced melanoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors was also analyzed. We established that gene expression data can be grouped in two different layers of information: immune and molecular. In the TCGA, the molecular classification provided information on processes such as epidermis development and keratinization, melanogenesis, and extracellular space and membrane. The immune layer classification was able to distinguish between responders and non-responders to immunotherapy in an independent series of patients with advanced melanoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors. We established that the immune information is independent than molecular features of the tumors in melanoma TCGA cohort, and an immune classification of these tumors was established. This immune classification was capable to determine what patients are going to respond to immunotherapy in a new cohort of patients with advanced melanoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors Therefore, this immune signature could be useful to the clinicians to identify those patients who will respond to immunotherapy.


Assuntos
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Transcriptoma , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/farmacologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/genética , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/genética , Imunoterapia
3.
Onco Targets Ther ; 14: 5345-5352, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34866914

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors delays the onset of resistance and provides more sustained and dramatic responses in comparison with a BRAF inhibitor in monotherapy. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination therapy with vemurafenib/cobimetinib in terms of durability, and to describe differential characteristics in patients associated to durable responses in real-world settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involving 41 patients with advanced melanoma harboring a BRAF V600 mutation who initiated a combination therapy with vemurafenib/cobimetinib between May 2018 and March 2019. Participants were differentiated regarding the durability of the response: durable (complete response, CR, or a partial response, PR, for at least 12 months) and non-durable (stable disease, SD, progressive disease, PD, or CR/PR <12 months). Secondary endpoints included treatment adherence, labor productivity, anxiety/depression, and safety profile. RESULTS: During the combination therapy, 12 patients (29.3%) had a CR, 19 a PR (46.3%), 5 showed SD (12.2%), and 5 had PD. A total of 12 patients (29.3%) were considered as achieving a durable response and 29 (70.7%) as a non-durable one. Practically all sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were similar between patients. Body mass index was the only differential factor (with higher body mass index achieving a non-durable response). The treatment adherence was 100% in patients with durable response and 66.7% in those with non-durable. CONCLUSION: The combination treatment with vemurafenib/cobimetinib results in an important impact on long-term survival, leading to a steady CR in one-third of the patients.

4.
Anticancer Drugs ; 23 Suppl: S10-2, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22739665

RESUMO

We report the case of a 62-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and distension. She was diagnosed with haemoperitoneum and a large tumour that occupied the entire left hypochondrium and attached to the posterior surface of the fundus of the stomach at the level of the greater curvature. Anatomical pathology examination identified the tumour as a gastrointestinal stromal tumour with highly malignant characteristics and the haemoperitoneum was considered to contribute to a worse prognosis because of its ability to produce a peritoneal seeding. Considering these adverse characteristics, imatinib was initiated as an adjuvant treatment, with no evidence of relapse in the follow-up.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/diagnóstico por imagem , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemoperitônio/diagnóstico por imagem , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Benzamidas , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/patologia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/cirurgia , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/patologia , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Hemoperitônio/tratamento farmacológico , Hemoperitônio/patologia , Hemoperitônio/cirurgia , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piperazinas/administração & dosagem , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Ruptura Espontânea , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...