Longitudinal trends in exercise capacity and health status after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD.

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes produce initial improvements in exercise tolerance and health status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there is limited data on the longer term effects of PR. This study has examined whether the initial benefits gained in exercise tolerance and health status may be maintained after a 1-year follow-up programme. Sixty-six patients with COPD were assessed with the MRC Dyspnoea Scale and found to be moderately disabled due to dyspnoea (MRC Grades 3 and 4). These patients were then randomised to an 8 week outpatient programme of either exercise training and education (Exercise group) or to education alone (Control group). Exercise performance was assessed with the shuttle walking test and health status assessed with two disease-specific measures, the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire and the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire. After PR, all patients were invited to attend monthly follow-up sessions for 1 year. Fifty-six patients were available for follow-up immediately after the programme and were assessed at 6 months and 1 year. This study has shown that the patients in the Exercise group maintained improvements in exercise capacity and health status up to 6 months after an 8 week programme. At 1 year there was a significant difference between the Exercise and Control groups in terms of exercise tolerance due to a considerable decline experienced by the Control group. However, neither group had maintained improvements in health status at 1 year. Further study is required to assess whether benefit may be sustained for a longer period using alternative follow-up strategies.

Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Methods of classifying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) depend largely upon spirometric measurements but disability is only weakly related to measurements of lung function. With the increased use of pulmonary rehabilitation, a need has been identified for a simple and standardised method of categorising disability in COPD. This study examined the validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale for this purpose. METHODS: One hundred patients with COPD were recruited from an outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Assessments included the MRC dyspnoea scale, spirometric tests, blood gas tensions, a shuttle walking test, and Borg scores for perceived breathlessness before and after exercise. Health status was assessed using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ). The Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (EADL) score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) score were also measured. RESULTS: Of the patients studied, 32 were classified as having MRC grade 3 dyspnoea, 34 MRC grade 4 dyspnoea, and 34 MRC grade 5 dyspnoea. Patients with MRC grades 1 and 2 dyspnoea were not included in the study. There was a significant association between MRC grade and shuttle distance, SGRQ and CRQ scores, mood state and EADL. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was not associated with MRC grade. Multiple logistic regression showed that the determinants of disability appeared to vary with the level of disability. Between MRC grades 3 and 4 the significant covariates were exercise performance, SGRQ and depression score, whilst between grades 4 and 5 exercise performance and age were the major determinants. CONCLUSIONS: The MRC dyspnoea scale is a simple and valid method of categorising patients with COPD in terms of their disability that could be used to complement FEV1 in the classification of COPD severity.

Randomized controlled trial of pulmonary rehabilitation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, stratified with the MRC dyspnoea scale.

This study tested the hypothesis that severity of respiratory disability may affect the outcome of pulmonary rehabilitation. In this randomized, controlled study, 126 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were stratified for dyspnoea using the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea score into MRC3/4 (Moderate) (n=66) and MRC 5 (Severe) dyspnoeic (n=60) groups. The patients were randomly assigned to an eight week programme of either exercise plus education (Exercise group) or education (Control group). Education and exercise programmes for the moderately dyspnoeic patients were carried out in a hospital outpatient setting. Severely dyspnoeic patients were all treated at home. Those in the Exercise group received an individualized training programme. There was a significant improvement in shuttle walking distance in the moderate dyspnoeic group, who received exercise training; baseline (mean+/-SEM) 191+/-22 m, post-rehabilitation 279+/-22 m (p<0.001). There was no improvement in exercise performance in the severely dyspnoeic patients receiving exercise. Neither group of control patients improved. Health status, assessed by the Total Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire score, increased in the moderately dyspnoeic patients receiving exercise from 80+/-18 to 95+/-17 (p<0.0001) after rehabilitation. Much smaller changes were seen in the other three groups. Improvement in exercise performance and health status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after an exercise programme depends on the initial degree of dyspnoea.