EUS-guided management of anastomotic stricture: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Anastomotic stenosis after low anterior resection is a serious complication and at times even requires surgical revision of the anastomosis. CASE PRESENTATION AND CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The patient presented with a 4.0 cm tubulovillous adenoma of the proximal rectum and underwent low anterior resection with loop ileostomy and subsequent reversal. The case was complicated by complete anastomotic stenosis. A novel technique was utilized to create an Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided neo-anastomosis endoscopically. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided creation of a neo-colorectal anastomosis is a safe and effective alternative to surgical anastomosis revision of a completely stenosed anastomosis.

Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation: the experience of a single institution.

PURPOSE: This study aims to review the short-term recurrence and complications of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) with mucopexy. METHODS: Approval was obtained for a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent DG-HAL from January 2007 to June 2009. A treatment failure was recorded if internal hemorrhoids were noted at follow up or symptoms persisted. All recurrences were assessed for predictive factors. RESULTS: The procedures were performed by four surgeons. Ninety-six patients were included. The average age was 63.5 years (21-81 years). The mean follow up was 15 months (3-35 months). Of the patients, 93 (96.8%) reported bleeding pre-operatively. Mucopexy accompanied DG-HAL in 87 (90.6%). Postoperative complications occurred in nine (9%) patients. Residual hemorrhoids were evident in 20 (21%) patients, 13 of whom required further management for symptomatic disease, five with DG-HAL. Fifty percent (10/20) and 70% (9/13) of the recurrences necessitating further treatment transpired during the first 20 procedures of each surgeon. All 13 symptomatic recurrences demonstrated large, circumferential internal hemorrhoids. CONCLUSIONS: DG-HAL is a simple procedure with a low complication rate. Recurrences are more frequent during the learning curve. Patients with large, circumferential internal hemorrhoids should be counseled about a possible higher rate of recurrence. DG-HAL can be effectively repeated for recurrences.

Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4: the minimally invasive approach is associated with significantly quicker recovery and reduced costs.

BACKGROUND: Conceivably, the benefits of earlier recovery associated with a minimally invasive technique used in laparoscopic colectomy (LC) may be amplified for patients with comorbid disease. The dearth of evidence supporting the safety of laparoscopy for these patients led to a comparison of outcomes between LC and open colectomy (OC) for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4. METHODS: Data for all ASA 3 and 4 patients who underwent elective LC were reviewed from a prospectively maintained laparoscopic database. The patients who underwent LC were matched with OC patients by age, gender, diagnosis, year, and type of surgery. Estimated blood loss, operation time, time to return of bowel function, length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and 30-day complication and mortality rates were compared using chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon tests as appropriate. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In this study, 231 LCs were matched with 231 OCs. The median age of the patients was 68 years, and 234 (51%) of the patients were male. There were 44 (19%) conversions from LC to OC. More patients in the OC group had undergone previous major laparotomy (5 vs. 15%; p < 0.001). Estimated blood loss, return of bowel function, length of hospital stay, and total direct costs were decreased in the LC group. Wound infection was significantly greater with OC (p = 0.02). When patients with previous major laparotomy were excluded, the two groups had similar overall morbidity. The other benefits of LC, however, persisted. CONCLUSION: The findings show that LC is a safe option for patients with a high ASA classification. The LC approach is associated with faster postoperative recovery, lower morbidity rates, and lower hospital costs than the OC approach.

Rectal advancement flap repair of rectourethral fistula: a 20-year experience.

PURPOSE: Several procedures have been described for the management of rectourethral fistula. There has been no consensus on the best method of repair. The aim of this study was to review our experience with treatment of rectourethral fistula, focusing on the outcomes of rectal advancement flap repair. METHODS: Data collected included demographics, cause, procedure type, presentation, operative details, and morbidity. Telephone follow-up was conducted to evaluate functional outcome and quality of life. RESULTS: From 1981 to 2001, 23 male patients (age, 54 +/- 15 years) were treated for rectourethral fistula. Fecal diversion alone was performed in seven patients (30 percent), and urinary diversion alone was performed in one patient (4 percent). Both fecal and urinary diversion were performed in 12 patients (52 percent), and no diversion was performed in 3 (13 percent). Four patients were managed conservatively with diversion only. Nineteen patients underwent definitive repair. Rectal advancement flap repair was used in 12 (52 percent) of the cases. Postoperative length of stay was 4.5 +/- 4 days. Patients were followed up for an average of 31 +/- 33.4 months. Rectal advancement flap achieved primary closure in 8 (67 percent) of 12 patients. There were four recurrences. Two patients underwent successful repeat repair, for a final success rate of 83 percent. Morbidity associated with rectal advancement flap was 8 percent (1/12 patients). Cleveland Global Quality of Life score averaged 0.82 +/- 0.13. CONCLUSION: The rectal advancement flap provides an effective repair for rectourethral fistula. Successful repair can be achieved in a majority of patients with minimal morbidity, short length of stay, and a good postoperative quality of life.