Imaging Patterns of Pneumonia.

Imaging findings of pneumonia are diverse, with frequent overlap between the various infectious etiologies of pneumonia, as well as various other disease conditions, including inflammatory conditions, vasculitis, and malignancy. In the appropriate clinical context, a number of imaging findings and the patterns that they form on imaging may provide clues that enable radiologists and clinicians to narrow the differential diagnostic considerations. Although a definite diagnosis can rarely be provided based on imaging findings alone, the combination of clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings are usually sufficient for accurate diagnosis and management decisions. It is important for radiologists to recognize the wide variety of imaging patterns that occur with different causes of pneumonia, and recognize specific imaging signs of certain infections when present, thereby facilitating diagnosis and optimizing patient care.

Comparison of Chest CT Findings of COVID-19, Influenza, and Organizing Pneumonia: A Multireader Study.

BACKGROUND. Previous studies compared CT findings of COVID-19 pneumonia with those of other infections; however, to our knowledge, no studies to date have included noninfectious organizing pneumonia (OP) for comparison. OBJECTIVE. The objectives of this study were to compare chest CT features of COVID-19, influenza, and OP using a multireader design and to assess the performance of radiologists in distinguishing between these conditions. METHODS. This retrospective study included 150 chest CT examinations in 150 patients (mean [± SD] age, 58 ± 16 years) with a diagnosis of COVID-19, influenza, or non-infectious OP (50 randomly selected abnormal CT examinations per diagnosis). Six thoracic radiologists independently assessed CT examinations for 14 individual CT findings and for Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) COVID-19 category and recorded a favored diagnosis. The CT characteristics of the three diagnoses were compared using random-effects models; the diagnostic performance of the readers was assessed. RESULTS. COVID-19 pneumonia was significantly different (p < .05) from influenza pneumonia for seven of 14 chest CT findings, although it was different (p < .05) from OP for four of 14 findings (central or diffuse distribution was seen in 10% and 7% of COVID-19 cases, respectively, vs 20% and 21% of OP cases, respectively; unilateral distribution was seen in 1% of COVID-19 cases vs 7% of OP cases; non-tree-in-bud nodules was seen in 32% of COVID-19 cases vs 53% of OP cases; tree-in-bud nodules were seen in 6% of COVID-19 cases vs 14% of OP cases). A total of 70% of cases of COVID-19, 33% of influenza cases, and 47% of OP cases had typical findings according to RSNA COVID-19 category assessment (p < .001). The mean percentage of correct favored diagnoses compared with actual diagnoses was 44% for COVID-19, 29% for influenza, and 39% for OP. The mean diagnostic accuracy of favored diagnoses was 70% for COVID-19 pneumonia and 68% for both influenza and OP. CONCLUSION. CT findings of COVID-19 substantially overlap with those of influenza and, to a greater extent, those of OP. The diagnostic accuracy of the radiologists was low in a study sample that contained equal proportions of these three types of pneumonia. CLINICAL IMPACT. Recognized challenges in diagnosing COVID-19 by CT are furthered by the strong overlap observed between the appearances of COVID-19 and OP on CT. This challenge may be particularly evident in clinical settings in which there are substantial proportions of patients with potential causes of OP such as ongoing cancer therapy or autoimmune conditions.

Imaging of the Anterior/Prevascular Mediastinum.

Prevascular mediastinal masses include a wide range of benign and malignant entities. Localization of mediastinal masses to specific compartments together with characteristic imaging findings and demographic and clinical information allows formulation of a focused differential diagnosis. Radiologists may use these methods to distinguish between surgical and nonsurgical cases and thus inform patient management and have an impact on outcomes. Treatment of choice varies based on the pathology, ranging from no intervention or serial imaging follow-up to surgical excision, chemotherapy, and/or radiation.

Clinical and Imaging Features of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Young Patients.

BACKGROUND: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in young adult patients is rare, with scarce data available in patients aged < 40 years and even less in those aged < 35 years. Our goal was to determine the presenting symptoms, clinicopathologic characteristics, and imaging features of young patients with NSCLC at time of diagnosis and compare them to those of older adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records and imaging of young patients (≤ 40 years old) with NSCLC treated at our institution between 1998 and 2018. Patients < 35 years old were compared to those between 35 and 40 years old. Characteristics of patients ≤ 40 years old were compared to older patients (> 40 years) from publicly available data sets. RESULTS: We identified 166 young patients with NSCLC (median age, 36.6 years; range, 18-40 years). Most presented with nonspecific respiratory symptoms and were diagnosed with pneumonia (84/136, 62%). Compared to patients < 35 years old, patients 35-40 years old were more likely to have malignancy detected incidentally (15% vs. 5%, P = .04). Patients < 35 years old were more likely to have central tumors (55% vs. 33%, P = .02) and to have bone (38% vs. 19%, P = .007) and lung (39% vs. 24%, P = .03) metastases. Compared to older patients (> 40 years), young patients were more likely to be never smokers (65.0% vs. 14.7%, P < .001) and to have advanced disease (88% vs. 66%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Young patients with NSCLC often present with nonspecific symptoms and have advanced disease at diagnosis, often mimicking other pathologies. Awareness of the clinical presentation and imaging features of NSCLC in young patients may help minimize delays in diagnoses.

Multimodality Imaging of Focal and Diffuse Fibrosing Mediastinitis.

Fibrosing mediastinitis is a rare benign but potentially life-threatening process that occurs because of proliferation of fibrotic tissue in the mediastinum. The focal subtype is more common and typically is associated with an abnormal immunologic response to Histoplasma capsulatum infection. Affected patients are typically young at presentation, but a wide age range has been reported, without a predilection for either sex. The diffuse form may be idiopathic or associated with autoimmunity, usually affects middle-aged and/or elderly patients, and is more common in men. For both subtypes, patients present with signs and symptoms related to obstruction or compression of vital mediastinal structures. The most common presenting signs and symptoms are cough, dyspnea, recurrent pneumonia, hemoptysis, and pleuritic chest pain. Patients with the diffuse subtype may have additional extrathoracic symptoms depending on the other organ systems involved. Because symptom severity is variable, treatment should be individualized with therapies tailored to alleviate compression of the affected mediastinal structures. Characteristic imaging features of fibrosing mediastinitis include infiltrative mediastinal soft tissue (with or without calcification) with compression or obstruction of mediastinal vascular structures and/or the aerodigestive tract. When identified in the appropriate clinical setting, these characteristic features allow the radiologist to suggest the diagnosis of fibrosing mediastinitis. Careful assessment is crucial at initial and follow-up imaging for exclusion of underlying malignancy, assessment of disease progression, identification of complications, and evaluation of treatment response. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2019.