Strategies to develop an LGBTQIA+-inclusive adolescent sexual health program evaluation.

Introduction: Adolescent sexual health interventions are increasingly incorporating content that is inclusive of LGBTQIA+ youth (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, intersex, asexual, and other marginalized sexualities and genders). Evaluations of such programs must also be inclusive to enhance the validity of evaluation results and avoid further marginalization. We present strategies for increasing LGBTQIA+-inclusivity based on our evaluation of SafeSpace, a sexual health curriculum. Methods: To design an LGBTQIA+-inclusive program evaluation, we leveraged LGBTQIA+ research staff's insights, pursued a parental consent waiver, developed an inclusive recruitment plan, and crafted demographic and sexual behavior survey measures with input from youth and equity experts. We conducted a pilot study with 42 youth ages 14-17 to assess the feasibility and efficacy of our strategies. Results: We obtained a parental consent waiver and recruited a majority LGBTQIA+ pilot study sample (62%). Using themes from cognitive interviews with youth and experts regarding inclusive framing and use of plain language, we refined demographic measures and expanded sexual behavior measures. Conclusion: Findings suggest that the strategies used to enhance LGBTQIA+-inclusivity in our evaluation of SafeSpace were effective in respectfully and more accurately capturing a fuller range of experiences and identities of LGBTQIA+ and cis-straight youth. The strategies and survey measures developed for this study can be applied to increase LGBTQIA+-inclusivity in other adolescent sexual health program evaluations.

The impact of funding disruptions on large-scale teen pregnancy prevention research projects.

To advance the field of teen pregnancy prevention, new interventions must be developed and tested. The federal Teen Pregnancy Prevention program (TPP) funds the evaluation of promising interventions. We report on a funding disruption to 21 TPP Tier 2B research grantees across the US that was unusual for its ideological causation, sudden timing, severity, and ultimately court decisions compelling the agency to reverse the decision. We address the following question: How did challenges presented by the attempted funding termination impact grantees' ability to continue with their intended research? Results from grantee surveys in 2019 demonstrate the funding disruption negatively impacted participant recruitment, organizational collaboration, program delivery, research rigor, and compromised grantees' ability to complete high-quality evaluations. Results also show most projects could continue, with modified research goals, when funding was reinstated. We conclude administrations should avoid arbitrarily and prematurely terminating research projects. However, there is merit in reinstating funds to projects should a disruption occur. Results from this work are particularly relevant as we anticipate how health research projects may manage other disruptions to funding or timetables, such as those caused by COVID-19. Results are relevant to policy makers, researchers, government and private funders, grantees, and technical assistance teams.

Short-Term Impacts of Pulse: An App-Based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program for Black and Latinx Women.

PURPOSE: Black and Latinx women aged 18-20 years have high rates of unplanned pregnancy. Furthermore, this age group is less likely than school-aged youth to be served by pregnancy prevention programs typically administered in schools. The study's purpose was to assess the effectiveness of a new app-based teen pregnancy prevention program created for this population using an online- and texting-only recruitment and evaluation approach. METHODS: The study design was a randomized controlled trial with individual-level assignment of 1,304 women aged 18-20 years recruited online. Seventy-six percent of participants were black or Latinx. Women were randomized to the Pulse reproductive health app or a general health app and received regular text messages with program content and reminders to view the app. An intention-to-treat approach was used for analyses, and significance tests were adjusted to account for permuted block random assignment and multiple hypothesis testing. Linear probability models controlling for the baseline measure of each outcome, whether the participant reported ever having vaginal sex, age, and race/ethnicity, assessed program impacts for 1,124 participants 6 weeks after randomization. RESULTS: Participants who received the intervention were 7.6 percentage points less likely (p = .001) to report having had sex without a hormonal or long-acting contraceptive method. Intervention participants also scored 7.1 percentage points higher on contraceptive knowledge (p = .000) and were 5.7 percentage points more likely to be confident that they can use birth control during every sexual intercourse (p = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Impacts at 6 weeks are promising, particularly for a self-led intervention with no direct contact with study staff.