RESUMO
PURPOSE: ChatGPT (Chat-Generative Pre-trained Transformer) has proven to be a powerful information tool on various topics, including healthcare. This system is based on information obtained on the Internet, but this information is not always reliable. Currently, few studies analyze the validity of these responses in rhinology. Our work aims to assess the quality and reliability of the information provided by AI regarding the main rhinological pathologies. METHODS: We asked to the default ChatGPT version (GPT-3.5) 65 questions about the most prevalent pathologies in rhinology. The focus was learning about the causes, risk factors, treatments, prognosis, and outcomes. We use the Discern questionnaire and a hexagonal radar schema to evaluate the quality of the information. We use Fleiss's kappa statistical analysis to determine the consistency of agreement between different observers. RESULTS: The overall evaluation of the Discern questionnaire resulted in a score of 4.05 (± 0.6). The results in the Reliability section are worse, with an average score of 3.18. (± 1.77). This score is affected by the responses to questions about the source of the information provided. The average score for the Quality section was 3.59 (± 1.18). Fleiss's Kappa shows substantial agreement, with a K of 0.69 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ChatGPT answers are accurate and reliable. It generates a simple and understandable description of the pathology for the patient's benefit. Our team considers that ChatGPT could be a useful tool to provide information under prior supervision by a health professional.
Assuntos
Otolaringologia , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Internet , Doenças Nasais/diagnósticoRESUMO
Introducción: La infección de herida quirúrgica (IHQ) es la principal causa de infección nosocomial en pacientes quirúrgicos, siendo la profilaxis antibiótica uno de los factores más importantes para su prevención. En este trabajo se evaluó la adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica en la artroplastia de cadera de acuerdo a la pauta establecida en nuestro centro y el efecto en la IHQ. Material y métodos. Se realizó un estudio de cohortes prospectivo entre enero de 2011 y diciembre de 2016. Se evaluó el grado de adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica en cirugía de artroplastia de cadera. Se estudió la incidencia de IHQ tras un periodo máximo de 90 días. El efecto de la inadecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica en la incidencia de IHQ se evaluó con el riesgo relativo (RR) ajustado mediante un modelo de regresión logística. Resultados. Se incluyeron un total de 681 pacientes. La incidencia global de IHQ fue del 4% (IC 95%: 2,5-5,5). La profilaxis antibiótica se administró en el 99% de los casos, con una adecuación al protocolo del 74%. La causa más frecuente de inadecuación fue la duración de la profilaxis, con un 22,2% (149 pacientes). El efecto de la inadecuación de la profilaxis sobre la incidencia de infección fue de RR ajustado =0,47; IC95%: 0,19-1,17) (p>0,05). Conclusiones. La adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica fue alta. No se encontró asociación entre adecuación de la profilaxis y la incidencia de infección en artroplastia de cadera. La vigilancia de la infección quirúrgica permite medir su incidencia y evaluar sus factores de riesgo
Introduction. The surgical site infection is the main cause of nosocomial infection in surgical patients, being antibiotic prophylaxis one of the most important factors for preventing it. This study evaluates adequacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in hip arthroplasty surgery as well as its effect on preventing surgical site infection. Material and methods. A prospective cohort study was carried out from January 2011 to December 2016. We assessed the degree of adequacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in hip arthroplasty. Incidence of surgical site infection was studied after a maximum incubation period of 90 days. In order to assess the effect of inadequate prophylaxis on surgical site infection we used the relative risk adjusted with a logistic regression model. Results. We studied 681 patients. Incidence of surgical site infection was 4% (95% CI 2.5-5.5). Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered in 99% of cases, with an overall protocol adequacy of 74%. The main cause of non-compliance was the length of prescription (22.2%; 149 patients). The effect of inadequate prophylaxis on surgical site infection was RR adjusted =0.47; 95%CI 0.19-1.17, (p>0.05). Conclusions. Adequacy of antibiotic prophylaxis was high. No relationship between prophylaxis adequacy and incidence of surgical site infection was founded. Surveillance allows us to assess surgical site infection and risk factors
