Design and validation of an electrophysiological based tool to assess chronic stress. Case study: burnout syndrome in caregivers.

Caregiver burnout syndrome is an increasingly seen condition, although the subjective nature of self-administered psychometric tests and the lack of a consensual diagnostic tool might hinder a proper diagnosis. The availability of objective psychosomatic measures of stress might facilitate the early diagnosis and clinical management of these patients. For this reason, the aim of this work was to develop a quantitative tool to evaluate the stress level of caregivers in a noninvasive and repeatable manner. An observational, controlled, matched study was designed including a group of 38 principal caregivers of chronic patients and a control group of 38 non-caregivers. Psychometric, biochemical, and electrophysiological data were analyzed along with sociodemographic data. A quantitative chronic stress reference scale (CSRs) was constructed based on the weighted contribution of several psychometric and biochemical variables and afterwards, a predictive psychosomatic model (ESBSm) correlated with CSRs was elaborated from extracted variables of several electrophysiological signals monitored for 10 min. The resulting CSR scale shows a high power to discriminate caregivers from the control group while the ESBSm shows a 79% correlation with the CSR scale validated through a 5-fold process. Therefore, the results demonstrate that the ESBS model is an objective and validated tool to diagnose the degree of stress linked to burnout in caregivers of chronic patients from a 10-min session of noninvasive monitoring with a reliability equivalent to the questionnaires currently used to quantify stress in caregivers.

Evaluation of chronic stress indicators in geriatric and oncologic caregivers: a cross-sectional study.

Caregiving induces chronic stress with physical and psychological impact on informal caregivers health. Therefore, subjective and objective indicators are needed for the early diagnosis of pathologic stress to prevent the risk of developing stress-related diseases in caregivers. Our aim was to assess the self-perceived stress, that is, how and how much the stressor affects the individual, through endocrine, metabolic, and immunologic biomarkers levels in geriatric and oncologic informal caregivers. Informal caregivers and non-caregivers were invited to participate in a cross-sectional study at the Clinic Hospital of Barcelona. Demographic and lifestyle characteristics, self-perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Stress Visual Analogue Scale), and biomarkers (copeptin, glucose, glycated hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), cholesterol, triglycerides, α-amylase, cortisol, tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), and Interleukins (IL-6 and IL-10)) were evaluated. Descriptive and non-parametric statistical data analysis were performed. Fifty-six subjects (19 non-caregivers, 17 geriatric caregivers, and 20 oncologic caregivers) participated. Median age (IQR) was 57 years (47-66) and 71.46% were women. Self-perceived stress was higher in oncologic caregivers than geriatric caregivers in all psychometric test analyzed (Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, p value < .05). Glucose concentrations and glycated hemoglobin levels differed statistically among groups (Kruskal-Wallis test (K-W tests), p value < .05), even though the median levels were not clinically relevant. Levels of other biomarkers did not differ significantly (K-W tests, p value > .05). These findings suggest that perceived stress is not homogeneous in the caregivers community and thus these two groups could be differentiated. These results provide the baseline information to initiate social actions addressed to each group of caregivers to increase their wellbeing.

Aproximación a una escala de referencia de estrés emocional agudo / An approach to an acute emotional stress reference scale

Introducción. El diagnóstico clínico persigue identificar el grado de afectación del estado psicofísico del paciente como orientación hacia la intervención terapéutica. En el estrés, la falta de un instrumento de medición por comparación con una referencia dificulta la valoración cuantitativa del nivel de afectación. Objetivo. Definir y hacer una primera validación de un patrón de referencia para la medida del estrés emocional agudo a partir de marcadores identificados como indicadores del nivel. Sujetos y métodos. En general, las medidas más sólidas y aceptadas de estrés por la comunidad científica son los tests psicométricos y las variables bioquímicas. Cada uno de ellos responde probablemente a procesos distintos y complementarios de la reacción frente a un estímulo estresante. La referencia que se propone es una media ponderada de estos indicadores, asignándoles pesos relativos de acuerdo con un análisis de componentes principales. Resultados. Para una primera aproximación y verificación de coherencia de la referencia propuesta, se ha utilizado un estudio experimental con una muestra de 40 jóvenes sanos sometidos al estímulo estresante psicosocial del Trier Social Stress Test. La escala propuesta diferencia netamente entre los dos estados con distintos niveles de estrés inducido. Conclusiones. Aceptando la subjetividad de la definición, y a falta de una validación posterior con nuevos datos experimentales, el patrón propuesto diferencia entre un estado de relax y uno de estrés emocional generados con un estímulo estresante moderado, como es el Trier Social Stress Test. La escala es robusta, ya que variaciones en la composición porcentual repercuten ligeramente en la puntuación, pero no en la diferenciación válida entre estados (AU)

Introduction. The clinical diagnosis aims to identify the degree of affectation of the psycho-physical state of the patient as a guide to therapeutic intervention. In stress, the lack of a measurement tool based on a reference makes it difficult to quantitatively assess this degree of affectation. Aim. To defi ne and perform a primary assessment of a standard reference in order to measure acute emotional stress from the markers identified as indicators of the degree. Subjects and methods. Psychometric tests and biochemical variables are, in general, the most accepted stress measurements by the scientific community. Each one of them probably responds to different and complementary processes related to the reaction to a stress stimulus. The reference that is proposed is a weighted mean of these indicators by assigning them relative weights in accordance with a principal components analysis. Results. An experimental study was conducted on 40 healthy young people subjected to the psychosocial stress stimulus of the Trier Social Stress Test in order to perform a primary assessment and consistency check of the proposed reference. The proposed scale clearly diff erentiates between the induced relax and stress states. Conclusions. Accepting the subjectivity of the defi nition and the lack of a subsequent validation with new experimental data, the proposed standard diff erentiates between a relax state and an emotional stress state triggered by a moderate stress stimulus, as it is the Trier Social Stress Test. The scale is robust. Although the variations in the percentage composition slightly aff ect the score, but they do not aff ect the valid diff erentiation between states (AU)

Cuantificación del estrés: información incompleta más un exceso de triunfalismo. Réplica / Quantification of stress: incomplete information plus excessive triumphalism. Reply

No disponible

Proyecto ES3: intentando la cuantificación y medida del nivel de estrés / Project ES3: attempting to quantify and measure the level of stress

Introducción. La Organización Mundial de la Salud ha calificado al estrés de ‘epidemia mundial’, debido a su cada vez mayor incidencia en la salud. El trabajo que se presenta en este artículo representa un intento de cuantificar objetivamente el nivel de estrés. Objetivo. La metodología desarrollada tiene como objetivo medir cuán lejos o cuán cerca se encuentra un sujeto de una situación considerada médica y socialmente como ‘normal’. Sujetos y métodos. Se ha realizado un estudio bibliográfico de la fisiopatología del estrés y sus métodos de estudio, en experimentación animal y en humanos. Se han puesto en marcha nueve estudios prospectivos observacionales con distintas tipologías de sujetos y estresores que cubren las diferentes tipologías de estrés. Resultados. Como resultado del estudio bibliográfico, se han identificado las distintas tipologías de estrés, los indicadores que describen resultados significativos, los tests psicométricos y los ‘agentes estresantes’ bien documentados. Este material ha permitido diseñar la metodología general y el detalle de los nueve ensayos clínicos. Los resultados preliminares obtenidos en algunos de los estudios han servido para validar los indicadores, así como la eficacia de las técnicas utilizadas experimentalmente para disminuir el estrés o para producirlo. Conclusiones. Los resultados preliminares obtenidos en los ensayos experimentales muestran que se está en el camino correcto hacia la definición y validación de marcadores multivariable para la cuantificación de los niveles de estrés, y sugieren que la metodología puede ser aplicada de forma similar al estudio de trastornos mentales (AU)

Introduction. The WHO has qualified stress as a ‘world epidemic’ due to its increasingly greater incidence on health. The work described in this paper represents an attempt to objectively quantify the level of stress. Aim. The aim of the method developed here is to measure how close or how far a subject is from a situation that can be considered ‘normal’ in medical and social terms. Subjects and methods. The literature on the pathophysiology of stress and its methods of study in experiments on both animals and humans was reviewed. Nine prospective observational studies were undertaken with different types of subjects and stressors covering the different types of stress. Results. The results of the literature review made it possible to identify the different types of stress, the indicators that yield significant results, the psychometric tests and the well-documented ‘stressors’. This material was then used to design the general method and the details of the nine clinical trials. The preliminary results obtained in some of the studies were used to validate the indicators as well as the efficacy of the techniques used experimentally to diminish stress or to produce it. Conclusions. The early results obtained in the experimental trials show that we are on the right path towards defining and validating multivariable markers for quantifying levels of stress and also suggest that the method can be applied in a similar way to the study of mental disorders (AU)

Project ES3: attempting to quantify and measure the level of stress.

INTRODUCTION: The WHO has qualified stress as a 'world epidemic' due to its increasingly greater incidence on health. The work described in this paper represents an attempt to objectively quantify the level of stress. AIM: The aim of the method developed here is to measure how close or how far a subject is from a situation that can be considered 'normal' in medical and social terms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The literature on the pathophysiology of stress and its methods of study in experiments on both animals and humans was reviewed. Nine prospective observational studies were undertaken with different types of subjects and stressors covering the different types of stress. RESULTS: The results of the literature review made it possible to identify the different types of stress, the indicators that yield significant results, the psychometric tests and the well-documented 'stressors'. This material was then used to design the general method and the details of the nine clinical trials. The preliminary results obtained in some of the studies were used to validate the indicators as well as the efficacy of the techniques used experimentally to diminish stress or to produce it. CONCLUSIONS: The early results obtained in the experimental trials show that we are on the right path towards defining and validating multivariable markers for quantifying levels of stress and also suggest that the method can be applied in a similar way to the study of mental disorders.

TITLE: Proyecto ES3: intentando la cuantificacion y medida del nivel de estres.Introduccion. La Organizacion Mundial de la Salud ha calificado al estres de 'epidemia mundial', debido a su cada vez mayor incidencia en la salud. El trabajo que se presenta en este articulo representa un intento de cuantificar objetivamente el nivel de estres. Objetivo. La metodologia desarrollada tiene como objetivo medir cuan lejos o cuan cerca se encuentra un sujeto de una situacion considerada medica y socialmente como 'normal'. Sujetos y metodos. Se ha realizado un estudio bibliografico de la fisiopatologia del estres y sus metodos de estudio, en experimentacion animal y en humanos. Se han puesto en marcha nueve estudios prospectivos observacionales con distintas tipologias de sujetos y estresores que cubren las diferentes tipologias de estres. Resultados. Como resultado del estudio bibliografico, se han identificado las distintas tipologias de estres, los indicadores que describen resultados significativos, los tests psicometricos y los 'agentes estresantes' bien documentados. Este material ha permitido diseñar la metodologia general y el detalle de los nueve ensayos clinicos. Los resultados preliminares obtenidos en algunos de los estudios han servido para validar los indicadores, asi como la eficacia de las tecnicas utilizadas experimentalmente para disminuir el estres o para producirlo. Conclusiones. Los resultados preliminares obtenidos en los ensayos experimentales muestran que se esta en el camino correcto hacia la definicion y validacion de marcadores multivariable para la cuantificacion de los niveles de estres, y sugieren que la metodologia puede ser aplicada de forma similar al estudio de trastornos mentales.