Real-World Safety and Outcome of First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Metastatic NSCLC with PDL-1 Expression ≥ 50%: A National Italian Multicentric Cohort ("PEMBROREAL" Study).

Results from the phase III Keynote-024 clinical trial established pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic NSCLC who have PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, EGFR, and ALK wild-type tumors. However, given the differences between patients treated in routine clinical practice and those treated in a clinical trial, real-world data are needed to confirm the treatment benefit in standard practice. Given the lack of data on large cohorts of patients with long follow-ups, we designed an observational retrospective study of patients with metastatic NSCLC who were treated with pembrolizumab, starting from its reimbursement eligibility until December 2020. The primary endpoints were PFS and OS, determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Response and safety were also evaluated. We followed 880 patients (median follow-up: 35.1 months) until February 2022. Median PFS and OS were 8.6 months (95% CI: 7.6-10.0) and 25.5 months (95% CI: 21.8-31.6), respectively. We also found that ECOG PS, PD-L1 expression, and habitual smoking were prognostic factors for PFS, while age, sex, ECOG PS, habitual smoking and histology had an impact on OS. Multivariable analysis confirms the prognostic role of PD-L1 for PFS and of ECOG for both PFS and OS. 39.9% of patients reported an adverse event, but only 6.3% of patients discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Our results suggest a long-term benefit of pembrolizumab in the first-line setting, as well as a safety profile consistent with the results of Keynote-024. Many collected variables appear to influence clinical outcome, but results from these exploratory unadjusted analyses should be interpreted with caution.

A real-world retrospective, observational study of first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score < 50% (PEMBROREAL).

Introduction: The phase III Keynote-189 trial established a first-line treatment combining pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and platinum as a standard treatment for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without known EGFR and ALK driver mutations and independent of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. However, in Italy, eligibility for the National Health Service payment program is limited to patients with PD-L1 <50%. The PEMBROREAL study assesses the real-world effectiveness and safety of pembrolizumab in patients eligible for the National Health Service payment program. Methods: PEMBROREAL is a retrospective, observational study on patients with NSCLC who started pembrolizumab combined with pemetrexed and platinum within the reimbursability time window, considered as December 2019 to December 2020. The primary endpoints were to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS; using the Kaplan-Meier method), response to therapy, and tolerability. Results: Until February 2022, 279 patients (median follow-up: 19.7 months) have been observed. The median PFS was 8.0 months (95% confidence interval: 6.5-9.2). OS was not reached, but we can estimate a 12- to 24-month survival rate for the combined treatment: 66.1% and 52.5%, respectively. PD-L1 expression and Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) Performance Status were both associated with PFS and OS. Overall, only 44.4% of patients reported an adverse event, whereas toxicity led to a 5.4% discontinuation rate. Conclusion: The results of the PEMBROREAL study have shown that the combined treatment of pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and platinum is effective for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC, even for patients with PD-L1 levels below 50%, despite the differences in patient demographics and pathological features compared to the Keynote-189 study. The adverse events reported during the study were more typical of chemotherapy treatment rather than immunotherapy, and physicians were able to manage them easily.

Case report: Successful multimodal assessment and management of chemothorax.

Dislocation or wrong placement of central venous catheters into the pleural cavity is rare, but if undiagnosed, may cause major, sometimes life-threatening, complications (pneumothorax, hemothorax, infection, and migration) and accidental pleural effusion due to intravenous injection of fluids containing drugs (i.e. chemotherapy, antibiotics, parenteral nutrition, other). We report a rare case of pleural effusion consisting of chemotherapy (chemothorax) directly injected into the pleural cavity due to the wrong placement of a central venous catheter (Porth-A-Cath) in a woman with breast cancer. A multidisciplinary management consisting of antidote administration, followed by removal of the venous device and washing of the pleural cavity through video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), avoided any major complication related to the adverse event.

Off-label and unlicensed drug use among neonatal intensive care units in Southern Italy.

BACKGROUND: Many drugs used for neonates are unlicensed or off-label. An increased risk of medication errors and unexpected adverse drug reactions is associated with their use. This risk is even higher in preterm newborns, because of their physiological immaturity and the exposure to many different medicines. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of unlicensed or off-label drugs in eight tertiary-level neonatal intensive care units (NICU) from two different southern Italian regions. METHODS: All drugs prescribed to newborns admitted to each NICU, during 1 month of observation, were recorded and classified as licensed, unlicensed or off-label, according, respectively, first, to their license status and, then, their indications, dose, treatment route, and duration of treatment specified in each specific marketing authorization. RESULTS: A total of 126 newborns were treated with at least one drug during the observation period. A total of 483 prescriptions referred to 87 different drugs, classified as licensed, unlicensed or off-label. Each newborn was exposed to three (median) different drugs; 88.6% were licensed and 11.4% unlicensed (range, according to different NICU, 1.9-26.7%). Among licensed drugs, 37.4% were used as off-label (range, 27.3-53.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of unlicensed or off-label drugs use is common practice in NICU, with wide variation in local policies and newborn characteristics. Well-designed and -conducted pharmaceutical studies in newborns are needed to increase the number of licensed drugs, thereby reducing any risk for patients due to over- or under-treatment, and also legal issues for clinicians.

Unlicensed and off-label use of medicines at a neonatology clinic in Italy.

OBJECTIVE: Many drugs used for children are not licensed or are used off-label. An increased risk of medication errors and unexpected adverse drug reactions (ADR) associated with off-label and unlicensed drug prescription has been reported. This risk increases in the newborn, who are more likely to be predisposed to an ADR due to their physiological immaturity. The objective of this study was to describe the use of unlicensed or off-label drugs in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). METHODS: All drugs prescribed to newborn admitted to the Neonatology Unit of Bari University Hospital, from July 1st to August 31st in 2004 were recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All the drugs prescribed were analysed with regard to their license status, then the licensed drugs were compared to the indications, dose, route of administration, duration of treatment, contraindications and warnings specified in the summary of product characteristics of the marketing authorization. RESULTS: Data were collected on 176 prescriptions for 61 different drugs given to 34 newborns. Drugs were licensed in 88% and unlicensed in 12% of cases. About the licensed drugs, in 37.5% medicines were used following the terms of the marketing authorization, in 22.7% of cases medicines were used in an off-label manner as they contained no information for paediatric use in the marketing authorization and in 27.8% of cases medicines were licensed for paediatric use, but they were used off-label with regard to age, dose, route of administration and duration of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite European and American initiatives aiming to promote greater awareness and research in the paediatric population, these data demonstrate that there is still a high percentage of unlicensed or off-label drugs use in neonatology, underlining the need to stimulate scientific data collection by means of experimental studies or outcome research.