Dose-effect functions for cocaine self-administration: effects of schedule and dosing procedure.

Research related to determining how procedural variables can alter dose-effect functions for cocaine self-administration is limited. Toward clarifying the role of procedural variables, responding was maintained in rats under either variable-interval (VI) or fixed-ratio (FR) schedules of cocaine infusion. In addition to free-operant FR schedules, discrete-trial FR schedules were evaluated. The dose-effect functions were obtained by either substituting a dose for the usual daily dose, instituting a particular dose for several sessions, or making all doses available within a session. Dose-effect functions for response rate (or number of trials with infusions for the discrete-trial FR) were bitonic for the VI and discrete-trial FR schedules but tended to be strictly decreasing for the free-operant FR schedules. Responding was maintained under FR schedules by a low dose (0.083 mg/infusion) if the dose was substituted for a higher daily dose but not when made available daily. Rate of response was higher under ratio schedules at 0.17 mg/infusion when this dose occurred within the context of other higher doses within a session than when the dose was simply substituted for a higher daily dose. These data indicate that procedural variables can alter dose-response curves for cocaine self-administration.

Assessment of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in the rat: lack of interaction with opioids.

The present study examined the effects of several opioid agonists and antagonists in rats trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever, food-reinforced, discrimination task. Neither fentanyl, a mu agonist, nor the delta agonist BW 373U86 elicited cocaine-appropriate responding. Although pretreatment with fentanyl failed to alter the discriminative stimulus effects of low doses of cocaine, cocaine reversed the rate-suppressant effects of fentanyl. Although the kappa agonist U50,488H decreased response rates, it did not substitute for cocaine. Injection of U50,488H in combination with the training dose of cocaine (10 mg/kg) reversed the rate-suppressant effects of U50,488H but failed to affect the cocaine cue. Administration of U50,488H (3 mg/kg), in conjunction with several doses of cocaine, did not shift the cocaine dose-response curve. Naltrindole and naltrexone, delta and mu antagonists respectively, did not block the effects of cocaine. Further, naltrindole did not substitute for the cocaine cue. Complete generalization was observed to the dopamine uptake inhibitor bupropion (30 mg/kg). These results suggest that fentanyl and U50,488H, at doses that purportedly influence mesolimbic dopamine levels, do not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. Moreover, activation of delta receptors and blockade of mu and delta receptors are similarly ineffective.