Natural history of acid sphingomyelinase deficiency among European patients during childhood and adolescence: A retrospective observational study.

Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) is a rare, lysosomal storage disease with limited evidence on its natural history. This retrospective, medical record abstraction study aimed to characterize the natural history of ASMD (types B and A/B) during childhood and adolescence. Recruiting sites were European centers (i.e., France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom) from the ASCEND-Peds trial (NCT02292654); these sites were targeted because of the rarity of ASMD and specialized care provided at these centers. The study population comprised ASMD trial patients (before exposure to treatment) and ASMD non-trial participants who were managed at the same trial sites. Overall, 18 patients were included (11 trials; 7 non-trials; median [Q1; Q3] age at ASMD diagnosis: 2.5 [1.0; 4.0] years). Median follow-up duration was 10.0 years. Frequently reported medical conditions were hepatobiliary (17 [94.4%]) and blood and lymphatic system disorders (16 [88.9%]). Adenoidectomy (3 [16.7%]) was the most commonly reported surgical procedure; gastroenteritis (5 [27.8%]) was the most frequently reported infection, and epistaxis (6 [33.3%]) was the most commonly reported bleeding event. Abnormal spleen (16 [88.9%]) and liver (15 [83.3%]) size and respiratory function (8 [44.4%]) were commonly reported during physical examination. Overall, 11 (61.1%) patients were hospitalized; 6 (33.3%) patients had emergency room visits. Findings were consistent with published literature and support the current understanding of natural history of ASMD.

A retrospective study of morbidity and mortality of chronic acid sphingomyelinase deficiency in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) is a rare, progressive, potentially fatal lysosomal storage disease that exhibits a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes. There is a need to expand the knowledge of disease mortality and morbidity in Germany because of limited information on survival analysis in patients with chronic ASMD (type B or type A/B). METHODS: This observational, multicentre, retrospective cohort study was conducted using medical records of patients with the first symptom onset/diagnosis of ASMD type B or type A/B between 1st January 1990 and 31st July 2021 from four German medical centres. Eligible medical records were abstracted to collect data on demographic characteristics, medical history, hospitalisation, mortality, and causes of death from disease onset to the last follow-up/death. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Standardised mortality ratio (SMR) was also explored. RESULTS: This study included 33 chart records of patients with ASMD type B (n = 24) and type A/B (n = 9), with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 8.0 [3.0-20.0] years and 1.0 [1.0-2.0] years, respectively, at diagnosis. The commonly reported manifestations were related to spleen (100.0%), liver (93.9%), and respiratory (77.4%) abnormalities. Nine deaths were reported at a median [IQR] age of 17.0 [5.0-25.0] years, with 66.7% of overall patients deceased at less than 18 years of age; the median [IQR] age at death for patients with ASMD type B (n = 4) and type A/B (n = 5) was 31.0 [11.0-55.0] and 9.0 [4.0-18.0] years, respectively. All deaths were ASMD-related and primarily caused by liver or respiratory failures or severe progressive neurodegeneration (two patients with ASMD type A/B). The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) overall survival age since birth was 45.4 (17.5-65.0) years. Additionally, an SMR [95% CI] analysis (21.6 [9.8-38.0]) showed that age-specific deaths in the ASMD population were 21.6 times more frequent than that in the general German population. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights considerable morbidity and mortality associated with ASMD type B and type A/B in Germany. It further emphasises the importance of effective therapy for chronic ASMD to reduce disease complications.

Prescribing patterns from medical chart abstraction of patients administered lipegfilgrastim: a pilot study in Europe.

Purpose: The objective of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility of conducting a drug utilization study of lipegfilgrastim in Europe using medical records and to examine the pattern of lipegfilgrastim on-label and off-label use. Methods: Data on lipegfilgrastim use between September 2014 and April 2017 were abstracted from medical records by two independent medical abstractors. Lipegfilgrastim indication was categorized either as on-label or as one of four types of off-label (I-IV) according to pre-defined criteria. An inter-rater reliability analysis was conducted to measure the degree of abstractor agreement for on-label and off-label use. Results: Information from 46 medical records was abstracted. Lipegfilgrastim use during the first chemotherapy treatment cycle was mostly indicated for prevention of neutropenia (82.6% of patients). On-label use was documented in 42 patients (91.3%), while off-label use was documented in two patients (4.3%); all events of off-label use were attributed to use with non-cytotoxic drugs. The remaining two patients (4.3%) had missing data. Overall agreement between the abstractors was high (91.6%). For three types (Types I-III) of off-label use, the kappa values suggested a perfect agreement (κ = 1). For Type IV off-label use (use in patients treated with non-cytotoxic drugs), κ = 0, suggesting a poor agreement. Conclusions: While recruitment was challenging, the results of this pilot study confirm the feasibility and availability of medical records and the use of pharmacists as abstractors to assess on- and off-label use of lipegfilgrastim. Lipegfilgrastim was mainly prescribed according to the approved indications.Key pointsFindings from this pilot study confirm the feasibility and availability of medical records and the use of pharmacists as abstractors to assess on-label and off-label use of lipegfilgrastim in routine clinical practice.Lipegfilgrastim was mainly prescribed according to the approved indications, and the proportion of off-label use was low.The high inter-rater agreement between the two abstractors suggests that one abstractor is sufficient for conducting chart abstraction of on- and off-label use.Additional data abstraction sources other than pharmacists will need to be identified to improve response rate and center recruitment.Findings from this pilot study are important for the successful planning and execution of subsequent drug utilization studies.

Effectiveness and Pharmacokinetic evaluation of Geonistin® (Oxytetracyline and Nystatin) Vaginal Tablets for Unspecific and Mixed Vulvovaginal Infections (GENIE Study).

The GENIE study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness and systemic exposure to oxytetracycline in local treatment of unspecific and mixed vulvovaginal infections characterized by vaginal discharge with Geonistin® vaginal tablets (100 mg oxytetracycline and 100 000 IU nystatin). The total number of subjects enrolled was 189. The treatment had beneficial effects in 100% of the study population. According to the Nugent score, the treatment had a positive effect in 89.2% of participants. The microbiological cure rate was 78.8%. Oxytetracycline concentration levels were from 13.3 to 32.2 ng/mL in 11 out of 15 subjects, and in four subjects the levels were below 10 ng/mL. Geonistin® had a beneficial effect on the unspecific and mixed vulvovaginal infections characterized by vaginal discharge in all efficacy and safety outcomes. Microbiological and the Nugent score efficacy measures confirmed clinical effectiveness. Beneficial efficacy results were achieved with only a few non-serious adverse events.

Bone health and adherence to vitamin D and calcium therapy in early breast cancer patients on endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: Randomized trials involving aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer patients have reported increased osteoporosis risk. Bone loss can be reduced with appropriate life style, vitamin D and calcium supplements, and with bisphosphonate therapy. The aim of this analysis was to investigate adherence to vitamin D and calcium in postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant non-steroidal AIs, and oncologists' adherence to the bone health guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study included 438 newly diagnosed patients and those who have already been receiving non-steroidal AIs for up to 3.5 years. Median endocrine therapy duration before recruitment in the study was 10.5 months (interquartile 4.8-26.6). RESULTS: Densitometry was performed on 142 patients (32.4%) before initiation of endocrine therapy, and on additional 38 (8.6%) patients at second study visit. Densitometry was not performed on 258 (59%) patients. Vitamin D and calcium were prescribed to 329/438 (75.1%) patients at some point during the study. Patients who took more than 80% of the prescribed dose were considered adherent. Self-reported adherence was 88.4%. Osteoporosis was diagnosed in 24 patients (5.5%) of the total study population, bearing in mind that 258/438 (59%) patients did not have densitometry. Bisphosphonates were prescribed to 54/438 (12.3%) patients, whilst only 19 (35.2%) of those had osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, lack of oncologists' adherence to the bone health guidelines was observed. In addition, a significant proportion of the patients did not adhere to the vitamin D and calcium.

SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF AZITHROMYCIN IN THE TREATMENT OF LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS: AN INTERNATIONAL, MULTICENTER, NON-COMPARATIVE STUDY.

The aim of this study was to describe clinical effectiveness of azithromycin in the management of lower respiratory tract infections in daily clinical practice, to examine duration of symptoms after therapy initiation, and to record any possible adverse effects of azithromycin treatment. A total of 153 patients were included in the analysis of the effectiveness of azithromycin: 94 patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and 59 with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Clinical effectiveness was assessed as improvement, cure or failure after three-day treatment with azithromycin. The assessment was based on a calculation of clinical score for each diagnosis before treatment and on days 4, 10 and 28 after treatment initiation. Clinical effectiveness of azithromycin was 93.6% in CAP group and 94.9% in AECB group. Azithromycin led to relief of symptoms within three days in 88.6% of CAP patients and 77.2% of AECB patients. Overall, 15 adverse events were reported in 14 (9.1%) patients. The most common adverse events were abdominal pain, diarrhea and vomiting, each reported in four (2.6%) patients. Accordingly, azithromycin was found to have high clinical effectiveness and a small number of adverse events in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. ISRCTN38391551.

Safety and effectiveness of azithromycin in the treatment of respiratory infections in children.

OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical effectiveness of azithromycin in the management of respiratory tract infections in children up to 12 years of age; to examine duration of symptoms after commencement of therapy and to mark adverse events possibly caused by treatment with azithromycin. METHODS: The overall ITT population included 156 children (65 with acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis (AP), 32 with acute otitis media (AOM), and 59 with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI)). Clinical effectiveness was based on results of improvement and cure after 3 day's treatment with azithromycin, calculating the clinical score for each diagnosis before treatment, at the 4th day (end of the therapy) and at the 12th or 28th day (end of the study). To better estimate patients' (parents') satisfaction with treatment, a diary was provided for each child and parents recorded the days when a child felt relief of symptoms. RESULTS: In this study azithromycin led to relief of symptoms after 3 days in 89.1% of patients. Antibiotics had been prescribed within 1 year prior to inclusion in 74.4% of patients and 29.5% had previously been treated with macrolides. Clinical effectiveness in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population was 94.8% and there were 5.2% failures. Overall, 18 (11.5%) patients reported 25 adverse events (AEs) and nine AEs were characterized as possibly, probably or definitely related to azithromycin. The most common adverse events were diarrhea in nine (5.8%) cases, vomiting in six (3.8%) and abdominal pain reported in four (2.6 %) patients. CONCLUSION: Results of this study show that azithromycin in the treatment of children with respiratory tract infections has high clinical effectiveness and a small number of adverse events. However, major limitations of the study are its design as a non-comparative, observational, postmarketing study and that the etiology of infections was not confirmed. Despite this, it can be concluded that azithromycin is a reliable antibiotic treatment for children's respiratory tract infections, giving fast resolution of symptoms with few adverse events in patients with presumed bacterial infections.

Prophylactic DNA immunization against multiple papillomavirus types.

At least 15 different papillomavirus types are causatively associated with the development of tumors in humans. Since the middle of 2006 a protective, virus-like particle based vaccine against the tumor-related HPV types 16 and 18 is commercially available. We investigated the possibility of applying DNA vaccination to obtain protective antibody responses against multiple papillomavirus types. Our data indicate that low amounts of DNA were sufficient to induce neutralizing antibodies in mice although a DNA dose-dependency in respect to the L1-specific antibody titers was observed. Furthermore, we found that immune responses against different PV types could be induced by simultaneous DNA vaccination with a mixture of expression vectors encoding L1 proteins of different papillomavirus types. However, we observed that there was a strong interference when plasmids encoding different L1 genes were used together. HPV 16 responses were repressed by co-administration of HPV 11 and/or BPV 1 L1 expression constructs. Likewise, BPV 1 responses were repressed by co-administration of HPV 16 or HPV 11 L1 plasmids. This interference could be overcome by administration of the different constructs into different sites of the animals or by sequential immunization. Thus, our results suggest that the mode of repression was due to interference with L1 particle assembly and was not a consequence of immunodominance of certain L1 proteins.