Optimal cutoff point for immunoperoxidase detection of C4d in the renal allograft: results from a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Although C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries has been identified as a strong risk factor for subsequent renal allograft loss, the optimal cutoff for the fraction of peritubular capillaries needed to establish a positive stain in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material has not been defined systematically. The objective of this study was to establish the threshold for positive staining that best predicts renal outcome in renal biopsies in a multicenter study in which local and central pathologic conditions were compared. METHODS: Unstained renal biopsy slides were obtained from 296 patients. The percentage of peritubular capillaries staining positively for C4d was detected by immunoperoxidase staining. RESULTS: The percentage C4d deposition ranged from 0% to 90% with 44% (129/296) having a positive percentage of C4d staining. The median for positive cases was 25%. Local C4d+ results were reported qualitatively, with 28% recorded as positive for C4d. Using a centrally determined cutoff of 10%, tests for agreement of local and central C4d staining were fair (κ 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.51). Raising the centrally determined cutoff to 25% or 50% did not change the κ values (0.44 and 0.41, respectively). By Cox proportional hazards model, C4d positivity (centrally determined assessment) using a cutoff of 10% was the strongest predictor of time to graft loss (hazard ratio 2.66, 95% confidence interval 1.68-4.21). Centrally determined C4d positivity correlated with Banff scores indicative of acute inflammation but not with scores indicative of fibrosis/atrophy or transplant glomerulopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that C4d positivity, defined as more than or equal to 10% by immunoperoxidase, is a strong predictor of graft loss.

Does prone positioning reduce small bowel dose in pelvic radiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer?

PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been shown to reduce the radiation dose to small bowel in pelvic RT in gynecology patients. Prone positioning has also been used to decrease small bowel dose by displacement of small bowel from the RT field in these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the combination of both IMRT and prone positioning on a belly board can reduce small bowel dose further in gynecologic cancer patients undergoing pelvic RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: IMRT plans for pelvic RT were computed in 16 patients with gynecologic cancer who had undergone planning CT scans in both the supine and the prone positions on a belly board. For the gross tumor volume, the uterus, cervix, and tumor (or postoperative region) were traced. The clinical target volume was defined as the vessels and lymph nodes from the obturator level to the aortic bifurcation, presacral region, and upper 4 cm of the vagina, in addition to gross tumor volume. The planning target volume was defined as a 2-cm margin in addition to the gross tumor volume and upper 4 cm of the vagina, and 1.5 cm for lymph nodes and vessels. Normal tissue regions of interest included small bowel, large bowel, and bladder. IMRT plans using (1) the limited arc technique (180 degrees arc length) and (2) the extended arc technique (340 degrees arc length) were computed. Dose-volume histograms for normal tissue structures and target were compared between the supine and prone IMRT plans using the paired t test. RESULTS: Prone positioning on a belly board decreased the small bowel dose in gynecologic pelvic IMRT, and the magnitude of improvement depended on the specific IMRT technique used. With the limited arc technique, prone positioning significantly decreased the irradiated small bowel volume at the 25-50-Gy dose levels compared with supine positioning. Small bowel volumes receiving > or =45 Gy decreased from 19% to 12.5% (p = 0.005) with prone positioning. With the extended arc technique, the decrease in irradiated small bowel volume was less marked, but remained detectable in the 35-45-Gy dose levels. Small bowel volumes receiving > or =45 Gy decreased from 13.6% to 10.1% (p = 0.03) with prone positioning. The effect of prone positioning on large bowel and bladder was variable. Large bowel volumes receiving > or =45 Gy increased with prone positioning from 16.5% to 20.6% (p = 0.02) in the limited arc technique and was unaffected in the extended arc technique. CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that prone positioning on a belly board can reduce the small bowel dose further in gynecology patients treated with pelvic RT, and that the dose reduction depends on the IMRT technique used.

Pitfalls of radiation survey after brachytherapy implant removal preceding Tl-201 study.

An unexpected elevated postimplant radiation survey is described in an elderly patient with an interstitial low-dose-rate iridium-192 (Ir-192) needle implant for endometrial cancer. The elevated activity was related to prolonged clearance of Tl-201 from a cardiac study that had been performed 7 days earlier. The Tl-201 accumulated in the soft tissue, particularly the colon, resulting in increased survey readings over the abdomen and raising concern that an Ir-192 source remained within the patient. This case shows that delayed excretion of a diagnostic radionuclide agent can cause elevated activity high enough to confound postradiotherapy implant survey readings. The estimated surface exposure from a single iridium source left in the pelvis was determined using a phantom study. Possible factors causing decreased excretion of Tl-201 in a patient with heart disease, arteriosclerotic vascular disease, previous pelvic radiation therapy, and a brachytherapy procedure are discussed. A preloading radiation survey is recommended in patients who have had previous nuclear medicine studies involving radionuclides with long half-lives.

Method and timing of tumor volume measurement for outcome prediction in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: Recently, imaging-based tumor volume before, during, and after radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to predict tumor response in cervical cancer. However, the effectiveness of different methods and timing of imaging-based tumor size assessment have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive value for treatment outcome derived from simple diameter-based ellipsoid tumor volume measurement using orthogonal diameters (with ellipsoid computation) with that derived from more complex contour tracing/region-of-interest (ROI) analysis 3D tumor volumetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were prospectively performed in 60 patients with advanced cervical cancer (Stages IB2-IVB/recurrent) at the start of RT, during early RT (20-25 Gy), mid-RT (45-50 Gy), and at follow-up (1-2 months after RT completion). ROI-based volumetry was derived by tracing the entire tumor region in each MR slice on the computer work station. For the diameter-based surrogate "ellipsoid volume," the three orthogonal diameters (d1, d2, d3) were measured on film hard copies to calculate volume as an ellipsoid (d1 x d2 x d3 x pi/6). Serial tumor volumes and regression rates determined by each method were correlated with local control, disease-free and overall survival, and the results were compared between the two measuring methods. Median post-therapy follow-up was 4.9 years (range, 2.0-8.2 years). RESULTS: The best method and time point of tumor size measurement for the prediction of outcome was the tumor regression rate in the mid-therapy MRI examination (at 45-50 Gy) using 3D ROI volumetry. For the pre-RT measurement both the diameter-based method and ROI volumetry provided similar predictive accuracy, particularly for patients with small (<40 cm3) and large (> or =100 cm3) pre-RT tumor size. However, the pre-RT tumor size measured by either method had much less predictive value for the intermediate-size (40-99 cm3) tumors, which accounted for the majority of patients (55%). Tumor regression rate (fast vs. slow) obtained during mid-RT (45-50 Gy), which could only be appreciated by 3D ROI volumetry, had the best outcome prediction rate for local control (84% vs. 22%, p < 0.0001) and disease-free survival (63% vs. 20%, p = 0.0005). Within the difficult to classify intermediate pre-RT size group, slow ROI-based regression rate predicted all treatment failures (local control rate: 0% vs. 91%, p < 0.0001; disease-free survival: 0% vs. 73%, p < 0.0001). Mid-RT regression rate based on simple diameter measurement did not predict outcome. The early-RT and post-RT measurements were least useful with either measuring method. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest that for the prediction of treatment outcome in cervical cancer, initial tumor volume can be estimated by simple diameter-based measurement obtained from film hard copies. When initial tumor volume is in the intermediate size range, ROI volumetry and an additional MRI during RT are needed to quantitatively analyze tumor regression rate for the prediction of treatment outcome.