Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 97(7): 502-7, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26414360

RESUMO

Introduction Enhanced recovery programmes have been established in some areas of elective surgery. This study applied enhanced recovery principles to elective oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery. Methods An enhanced recovery programme for patients undergoing open oesophagogastrectomy, total and subtotal gastrectomy for oesophageal and gastric malignancy was designed. A retrospective cohort study compared length of stay on the critical care unit (CCU), total length of inpatient stay, rates of complications and in-hospital mortality prior to (35 patients) and following (27 patients) implementation. Results In the cohort study, the median total length of stay was reduced by 3 days following oesophagogastrectomy and total gastrectomy. The median length of stay on the CCU remained the same for all patients. The rates of complications and mortality were the same. Conclusions The standardised protocol reduced the median overall length of stay but did not reduce CCU stay. Enhanced recovery principles can be applied to patients undergoing major oesophagogastrectomy and total gastrectomy as long as they have minimal or reversible co-morbidity.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Gastrectomia , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos Clínicos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Esofagectomia/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gastrectomia/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Endoscopy ; 44(10): 892-8, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22752886

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: There is a view that the majority of deaths in patients with Barrett's esophagus are from causes other than esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The aim of this analysis was to establish the pattern of mortality for a number of causes in patients with Barrett's esophagus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center prospective cohort study of patients from Rotherham District General Hospital, which is a secondary referral center. The cohort consisted of 1239 patients who were diagnosed with Barrett's esophagus between April 1978 and March 2009.  Follow-up for mortality was undertaken by "flagging" the patients with the NHS Information Center. Causes of death were compared with UK Office of National Statistics age- and sex-specific mortality data for 1999, the median year of diagnosis. Analysis was by a "person - years at risk" calculation from date of diagnosis. RESULTS: The ratio of observed deaths from EAC compared with those expected in this cohort was 25.02 - a very large excess. There was no difference in mortality from colorectal cancer or circulatory disease and there were fewer deaths from cancers other than esophageal adenocarcinoma and colon cancer compared with national statistics. There was a small statistically significant difference in mortality from all causes but this disappeared completely when deaths from esophageal adenocarcinoma were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, mortality in Barrett's esophagus is increased significantly but only as a result of the large excess of deaths from EAC. This strengthens the case for endoscopic surveillance if successful interventions can be undertaken in patients with Barrett's esophagus to prevent development of esophageal adenocarcinoma.


Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Idoso , Esôfago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Biópsia , Causas de Morte , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Esofagoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição de Poisson , Estudos Prospectivos , Medicina Estatal , Taxa de Sobrevida
4.
Minerva Chir ; 64(2): 169-81, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19365317

RESUMO

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is extremely common throughout Europe and the United States. This review on antireflux surgery examines the best evidence for surgical treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Comparison is made with medical antireflux therapy including histamine H2 receptor antagonist and proton pump inhibitor therapy. The randomized trials and systematic reviews available on gastro-esophageal reflux disease are reviewed and where data are scarce, the largest cohort studies available are discussed. Overall, laparoscopic antireflux surgery is safe and has a similar efficacy to open antireflux surgery and best medical therapy with proton pump inhibitors. There is a failure rate, which in some series is greater than 50% at 5 years. Due to the cost of a proportion of patients still taking antireflux medications, it cannot be recommended on cost-effectiveness grounds over best medical therapy. The choice of procedure lies between complete wrap with Nissen's fundoplication and partial fundoplication (most frequently Toupet). Division of the short gastric vessels is not usually necessary and is associated with increased wind-related complications. Total fundoplication tends to produce superior reflux control, but at the cost of increased risk of dysphagia. There is a trend for antireflux surgery to be superior to best medical therapy in cancer prevention in Barrett's oesophagus, but this has not reached statistical significance.


Assuntos
Fundoplicatura/métodos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Fundoplicatura/efeitos adversos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 29(10): 1096-105, 2009 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19222408

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prolonged gastro-oesophageal reflux resulting in columnar metaplasia of the oesophagus is the main risk factor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. AIM: To examine the duration of symptoms and associations of different symptoms with the development of columnar-lined oesophagus, dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. METHODS: UK multicentre cohort study of patients with columnar-lined oesophagus whose date of symptom onset (1082 patients) and/or types of symptoms reported (1681 patients) were documented. Follow-up was examined by analysis of histological reports from the registering centers. RESULTS: Symptoms of dysphagia/odynophagia and nausea/vomiting were associated with development of dysplasia. High-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma were associated with dysphagia/odynophagia and weight loss. Median duration from symptom onset to detection of columnar-lined oesophagus without intestinal metaplasia: 2.6 years, columnar-lined oesophagus with intestinal metaplasia: 5.0 years, indefinite changes for dysplasia: 19.3 years and low-grade dysplasia: 30.0 years. One tenth of patients had developed high-grade dysplasia at 9.6 years and one tenth had developed adenocarcinoma at 13.8 years from symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with columnar-lined oesophagus, symptoms of dysphagia/odynophagia and nausea/vomiting were associated with a higher risk of development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. There is a trend for longer duration of symptoms to the detection of dysplasia.


Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Esôfago/patologia , Humanos , Metaplasia/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
6.
Dig Dis Sci ; 53(5): 1175-85, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17939050

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Lifestyle and demographic risk factors for the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma developing from columnar-lined oesophagus are not well defined. METHODS: Demographic and lifestyle factors, endoscopy and histology reports were extracted from 1,761 subjects from seven UK centres. The associations of columnar-lined oesophagus with demographic and lifestyle factors and the development of adenocarcinoma were examined. RESULTS: 5.5% of patients had prevalent adenocarcinoma (more common in males, older patients, patients diagnosed earlier in the cohort and current or recent smokers). Adenocarcinoma incidence was 23 patients in 3,912 years or 0.59% per annum. Only increased age at diagnosis correlated with an increased risk of incident adenocarcinoma. There was no association with obesity or alcohol history. CONCLUSIONS: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma occurs more commonly in older patients and is more frequent in males than females. Once columnar-lined oesophagus had been diagnosed, there were no other demographic or lifestyle factors which were predictive of the development of incident adenocarcinoma in this cohort.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Esôfago de Barrett/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Estilo de Vida , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Análise de Variância , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Demografia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fumar/epidemiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
7.
Dis Esophagus ; 20(6): 497-503, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17958725

RESUMO

A number of previous studies have reported patients with Barrett's columnar metaplasia who have an increase or decrease in segment length over time. It is not clear whether patients who have an apparent shortening of the metaplastic segment are subsequently at a lower neoplastic risk and those whose segment length appears to increase are at a higher risk of adenocarcinoma development. The aim of this study was to investigate these issues by studying a large cohort of patients from the UK National Barrett's Oesophagus Registry. Medical records of 1533 patients registered with the UK National Barrett's Oesophagus Registry were examined from seven UK centers. Data were extracted on metaplastic segment length at surveillance endoscopies and histological findings on biopsy. Overall changes in segment length, variability in measurement and probability of the development of dysplasia and neoplasia over time were examined. At least two segment lengths were measured in 763 patients. The median change from measured diagnostic length to most outlying measured segment length was 3.0 cm, but overall there was no tendency for segment length to increase or decrease in the majority of patients with a follow up of up to 20 years. Most patients were treated with proton pump inhibitors. One hundred and eighty-six patients had three or more segment lengths over the first 10 years of follow up. No change in risk was demonstrated in these patients where length appeared to consistently increase with time or when it appeared to decrease. Overall, metaplastic columnar-lined esophagus segment length does not change over time, and when an apparent change is observed, this does not influence a risk of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma.


Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Esôfago/patologia , Esôfago de Barrett/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...