Antibody therapy for breast cancer.

Targeted therapies against tumor biological properties are an essential part of individualized therapy concepts in breast cancer. Next to risk-adapted strategies using conventional chemo- and/or endocrine therapies, antibody therapy has become an additional option. The humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin) is the first novel targeted therapy approved for routine clinical application in advanced breast cancer. Patients with HER2/neu protein overexpression as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or gene amplification as assessed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) in their tumors respond well to palliative trastuzumab therapy, either as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy. New combinations with endocrine therapy are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Trastuzumab therapy is generally well-tolerated. So far, considerable cardiotoxicity was seen only in combination with doxorubicin. Thus, extensive cardiomonitoring is now performed in trials assessing further chemotherapeutic partners. Clinical trials looking at early trastuzumab therapy in the adjuvant (e.g. HERA, BOND 006) or neoadjuvant (e.g. TECHNO) setting are still open for recruitment in Germany. Since only about those 25 % of breast cancers which are HER2/neu-positive are eligible for trastuzumab, novel targeted therapeutics for the remaining HER2/neu-negative tumors are needed. Another therapeutic antibody, 2C4 (Pertuzumab, Omnitarg), is currently under clinical evaluation. It binds to a different epitope on HER2/neu than trastuzumab and inhibits heterodimerization with other HER receptors. Phase I data showed that 2C4 is well tolerated and clinically active.

C-Met overexpression in node-positive breast cancer identifies patients with poor clinical outcome independent of Her2/neu.

Receptor tyrosine kinases play an important role in malignant transformation of epithelial cells by activating signal transduction pathways important for proliferation, invasion and metastasis. In a pilot study (n = 40), we evaluated expression of the c-Met and Her2/neu receptor tyrosine kinases and the c-Met ligand hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) in primary breast cancers and their lymph node metastases using both conventional immunohistochemistry and confocal immunofluorescence. Neither c-Met and HGF/SF nor Her2/neu expression correlated with established prognostic factors such as age, lymph node involvement, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), tumor size, or grade. Both staining methods confirmed a significant correlation between c-Met overexpression and a high risk of disease progression. Furthermore, among tumors with c-Met overexpression, only 50% also overexpress Her2/neu, thus identifying a subset of patients with aggressive disease in addition to Her2/neu. Median disease-free survival in patients with c-Met overexpressing tumors was 8 months compared to 53 months when c-Met expression was low (p = 0.037; RR = 3.0). This significant impact of c-Met on tumor aggressiveness independent of Her2/neu was also confirmed by multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the role of c-Met expression as a prognostic variable and consequently as an interesting target for novel therapeutic approaches deserves further analysis in a larger cohort of patients.

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor type 1 predict disease outcome and therapy response in primary breast cancer.

Combined determination of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor, activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), supports risk-adapted individualized therapy concepts, particularly in node-negative breast cancer. The prognostic impact of both factors in primary breast cancer was substantiated by a pooled analysis of > 8000 patients with breast cancer and a multicenter prospective randomized therapy trial in node-negative breast cancer; findings achieved the highest level of evidence for tumor biomarkers. Patients with node-negative breast cancer with low antigen levels of uPA and PAI-1 in their primary tumor tissue have a very good prognosis and therefore may be spared the burden of adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas those with elevated uPA/PAI-1 antigen levels carry an increased risk of disease recurrence. Recent retrospective analysis of > 3000 patients indicated that patients with breast cancer with high uPA/PAI-1 values derive a significantly greater benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy than patients with low uPA/PAI-1 levels. Similarly, in the multicenter prospective Chemo N0 trial, administration of cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy led to a substantial reduction in risk of disease recurrence in patients with high uPA/PAI-1. However, benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy appears to be independent of a patient's uPA/PAI-1 status. In metastatic breast cancer, retrospective studies showed that elevated uPA or PAI-1 present in the primary tumor tissue are associated with a poor response to later palliative endocrine therapy. These findings suggest that high levels of uPA and/or PAI-1 do reflect an aggressive phenotype that may be overcome or suppressed by early systemic therapy in the adjuvant setting but may be too advanced for response to palliative therapy at a later stage.

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor PAI-I: novel tumor-derived factors with a high prognostic and predictive impact in breast cancer.

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor, PAI-I, play a key role in tumor invasion and metastasis. They were the first novel tumor biological factors to be validated at the highest level of evidence (LOE I) regarding their clinical utility in breast cancer. Their antigen levels are determined in tumor tissue extracts by standardized, quality-assured immunometric assays (ELISA). Since the late 1980s, numerous independent studies have demonstrated that patients with low levels of uPA and PAI-I in their primary tumor tissue have a significantly better survival than patients with high levels of either factor. These prognostic data have recently been validated by an EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) pooled analysis comprising more than 8,000 breast cancer patients. In addition, results from a multicenter prospective randomized therapy trial in node-negative breast cancer ("Chemo N(0)") showed that node-negative breast cancer patients with low levels of uPA and PAI-I in their primary tumor have a very good prognosis, and may thus be candidates for being spared the burden of adjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, node-negative patients with high uPA/PAI-I are at substantially increased risk of disease recurrence, comparable to that of patients with three or more tumor cell positive axillary lymph nodes. The "Chemo N(0)" trial as well as retrospective data also indicate that these high-risk patients benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, over a period of about 15 years sufficient evidence has been put forward to demonstrate that determination of uPA and PAI-I in primary breast cancer patients supports risk-adapted individualized therapy decisions, particularily in patients with node-negative disease.