Utility of the material community deprivation index as a metric to identify at-risk children for severe traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality with lasting effects including neurological deficits and psychological comorbidities. Recent studies have shown that social determinants of health are key factors that impact clinical outcomes in other pediatric traumatic injuries, suggesting that these health disparities may have a significant impact on patients sustaining TBI as well. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review a cohort of pediatric patients diagnosed with TBI and elucidate the relationships among socioeconomic deprivation, patient-specific demographics, and morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of pediatric patients (≤ 18 years of age) treated for TBI at a level I pediatric trauma center between 2016 and 2020. Patients with concussion-related injuries without intracranial findings and those with nonaccidental trauma were excluded from the study. In addition to evaluating basic patient demographics, the authors geocoded patient addresses to allow identification of the patient's home census tract using the material community deprivation index (MCDI). The MCDI is a unique composite index score created by the combination of six census variables and ranges from 0 to 1 in severity. RESULTS: Of the 513 patients included in this study, 71 (13.8%) were diagnosed with severe TBI, 28 (5.5%) with moderate TBI, and 414 (80.7%) with mild TBI. Patients in quartile 4 (MCDI ≥ 0.45) were at a significantly higher risk of having a severe TBI than patients in quartile 1 (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.1-4.71; p = 0.02). Black patients were more likely to have a firearm-related TBI (OR 3.74, 95% CI 2.01-8.7; p = 0.018) than non-Black patients. Patients who lived in a neighborhood with a lower MCDI were significantly more likely to be discharged home than those who lived in an area with a higher MCDI (OR 2.78, 95% CI 7.90-32.93; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that inequities continue to exist within the pediatric TBI population and that the MCDI is a valuable tool to identify at-risk subpopulations. More specifically, patients who lived in a neighborhood with a higher MCDI were at higher risk of sustaining a severe TBI. By partnering with communities, families, and policymakers, healthcare providers could serve as advocates for these patients and work to minimize the social disparities that continue to exist.

Effect of allograft patch closure on incidence of spinal inclusion cyst formation following open fetal myelomeningocele repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of spinal inclusion cyst (sIC) formation after open fetal myelomeningocele (fMMC) repair and the effect of dural patch closure. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent open fMMC repair at their institution between March 2011 and June 2020. All patients met the criteria for intervention defined by the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS). The primary outcomes investigated were development of sIC and need for surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included need for CSF diversion, extent of reversal of hindbrain herniation, and ambulatory status. RESULTS: Of 56 patients who underwent open fMMC repair, 52 had adequate spinal imaging for review. Twelve of these patients (23%) developed sIC (95% CI 0.11-0.35). Six patients experienced symptoms and required surgical detethering with sIC resection. Six additional patients had evidence of sIC on surveillance MRI but remained asymptomatic. The authors found a statistically significant relationship between the use of a dural allograft patch and sIC formation (p = 0.05). In terms of sIC development, there was no statistically significant difference between patients who underwent primary closure and those who received an allograft at the level of the fascia (p = 0.34) or skin (p = 0.26). The rate of hydrocephalus requiring CSF diversion was 52%. Interestingly, 98% of patients had improvement in extent of hindbrain herniation. Dural patch closure did not have any effect on the rate of progressive hydrocephalus (p = 0.33) or degree of reversal of hindbrain herniation (p > 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that children with prenatally repaired MMC are at higher risk for development of sIC and associated symptoms than those who undergo postnatal repair. The presentation of symptoms was also earlier in these patients than previously reported after postnatal repair. The use of a dural allograft patch appears to have a positive correlation with sIC formation. Future investigations evaluating the incidence of sIC after fetoscopic MMC repair, in which primary dural closure typically cannot be achieved and a dural patch is most often utilized, will be helpful in facilitating prenatal counseling for patients considering fetal intervention.

Social determinants of health affecting treatment of pediatric brain tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Little is understood about the role that health disparities play in the treatment and management of brain tumors in children. The purpose of this study was to determine if health disparities impact the timing of initial and follow-up care of patients, as well as overall survival. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective study of pediatric patients (< 18 years of age) previously diagnosed with, and initially treated for, a primary CNS tumor between 2005 and 2012 at Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt. Primary outcomes included time from symptom presentation to initial neurosurgery consultation and percentage of missed follow-up visits for ancillary or core services (defined as no-show visits). Core services were defined as healthcare interactions directly involved with CNS tumor management, whereas ancillary services were appointments that might be related to overall care of the patient but not directly focused on treatment of the tumor. Statistical analysis included Pearson's chi-square test, nonparametric univariable tests, and multivariable linear regression. Statistical significance was set a priori at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The analysis included 198 patients. The median time from symptom onset to initial presentation was 30.0 days. A mean of 7.45% of all core visits were missed. When comparing African American and Caucasian patients, there was no significant difference in age at diagnosis, timing of initial symptoms, or tumor grade. African American patients missed significantly more core visits than Caucasian patients (p = 0.007); this became even more significant when controlling for other factors in the multivariable analysis (p < 0.001). African American patients were more likely to have public insurance, while Caucasian patients were more likely to have private insurance (p = 0.025). When evaluating survival, no health disparities were identified. CONCLUSIONS: No significant health disparities were identified when evaluating the timing of presentation and survival. A racial disparity was noted when evaluating missed follow-up visits. Future work should focus on identifying reasons for differences and whether social determinants of health affect other aspects of treatment.