Cervical approach for prestyloid parapharyngeal pleomorphic adenoma resection.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the key points of cervical resection for prestyloid parapharyngeal pleomorphic adenoma and to discuss the role of modern imaging. OBSERVATION: Retrospective case series of 10 patients (4 women and 6 men, age 29-63 years) with prestyloid parapharyngeal pleomorphic adenoma with 2 to 8cm largest diameter on MRI, consecutively resected via a cervical approach between 2000 and 2020 in a French tertiary university referral care center. Seven patients had a minimum 10 years' follow-up, and one was lost to follow-up before the fifth postoperative year. Peri- and postoperative complications comprised great auricular nerve transection without subsequent symptomatic neuroma (2 patients), associated transoral approach to free the upper pole of the adenoma (2 patients), capsule effraction (3 patients), and hematoma (1 patient). There were no cases of facial paresis or palsy, other cranial nerve impairment, trismus, auriculotemporal or first-bite syndrome. One of the three patients with capsule effraction showed local recurrence at month 17. CONCLUSION: In agreement with previous reports, the present case series confirmed the role of the cervical approach to resect prestyloid parapharyngeal pleomorphic adenoma, and hence the need to continue teaching it.

Positive predictive values of MRI and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for isolated parotid swelling in adults: A STARD comparative analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate positive predictive values (PPVs) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (UFNAB) in patients with isolated parotid swelling. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational study following the STARD guideline, based on a cohort of 212 patients from 18 to 93years of age, with isolated parotid swelling (malignant: 16.9%; benign: 83.1%), consecutively operated on between 2015 and 2020, after work-up including MRI and UFNAB in an otorhinolaryngology department of a university hospital. The main endpoint was PPV for diagnosis of benign tumor, malignant tumor and the most frequent etiology. Secondary endpoints were correlations between PPVs and clinical factors for malignancy, and the impact on PPV of various situations: dynamic analysis on MRI; diagnostic disagreement between MRI and UFNAB; and UFNAB PPV according to MRI diagnosis. RESULTS: PPVs for MRI and UFNAB were respectively 45.4% and 88.8% for malignant tumor, 89.6% and 46.9% for benign tumor, and 88.1% and 85.2% for pleomorphic adenoma (the most frequent etiology). Tumor fixation and history of head and neck radiation therapy PPVs were the only one higher than the MRI one for malignant tumor. MRI PPV did not differ between groups with or without dynamic analysis. PPV for malignant tumor, benign tumor and pleomorphic adenoma on MRI and UFNAB was respectively 42.8% and 33.3%, 42.8% and 100%, and 36.3% and 50% in case of diagnostic discordance. When MRI suggested malignant tumor, UFNAB PPV was 51.8% for malignant tumor, 67.7% for benign tumor, and 37.5% for pleomorphic adenoma; when MRI suggested benign tumor, it was 32.2% for malignant tumor, 91.5% for benign tumor, and 88.5% for pleomorphic adenoma; and, when MRI suggested pleomorphic adenoma, it was 23.5% for malignant tumor, 93.9% for benign tumor, and 92% for pleomorphic adenoma. CONCLUSION: Systematic association of UFNAB to MRI did not fundamentally improve diagnostic accuracy. UFNAB appeared most valuable in case of history of radiation therapy, in case of tumor fixation, and when MRI diagnosis was uncertain and/or suggested malignant tumor and/or the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was low. The contribution of UFNAB when MRI suggested benign tumor or especially pleomorphic adenoma was more limited.

3D-printed face protective shield in interventional radiology: Evaluation of an immediate solution in the era of COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the clinical evaluation of a 3D-printed protective face shield designed to protect interventional radiologists from droplet transmission of the SARS-Cov-2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A protective face shield consisting in a standard transparent polymerizing vinyl chloride (PVC) sheet was built using commercially available 3D printers. The 3D-printed face shield was evaluated in 31 interventional procedures in terms of ability to perform the assigned intervention as usual, quality of visual comfort and tolerance using a Likert scale (from 1, as very good to 5, as extremely poor). RESULTS: The mean rating for ability to perform the assigned intervention as usual was 1.7±0.8 (SD) (range: 1-4). The mean visual tolerance rating was 1.6±0.7 (SD) (range: 1-4). The mean tolerability rating was 1.4±0.7 (SD) (range: 1-3). CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed protective face shield is well accepted in various interventions. It may become an additional option for protection of interventional radiologists.

Retrospective Analysis of Delayed Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage after Flow-Diverter Treatment: Presentation of a Retrospective Multicenter Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracranial aneurysm treatment with flow diverters has shown satisfying results in terms of aneurysm occlusion, and while some cases of delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage have been described, no systematic analysis of the risk factors affecting its occurrence has been conducted in a large series of patients. This retrospective analysis of delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage after flow-diverter treatment is a multicenter, retrospective study using a large series of treated patients to analyze factors affecting the occurrence of delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with flow diverters and presenting with delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage were included from December 2007 to December 2014 in 7 participating centers in France. Patient and aneurysm characteristics were recorded as were characteristics of bleeding (size, lateralization, and time to bleed), treatment, and clinical outcome after 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: Delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage occurred in 11 patients between 1 and 21 days after the procedure. In 10 of these patients, hemorrhages were ipsilateral to the treated aneurysms. Five of the 11 underwent surgery, and 9 of the 11 had good clinical outcomes at 6 months (mRS ≤2). CONCLUSIONS: The pathogenesis of delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage occurring after flow-diverter treatment remains unclear. The multidisciplinary management of delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage yields a relatively low morbidity-mortality rate compared with the initial clinical presentation.