Risk factors associated with non-fatal adolescent firearm injuries.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To identify behavioral, environmental, and sociodemographic risk factors associated with non-fatal firearm injuries among inner city adolescents in the United States. DESIGN: A case-control study in which patients with firearm injury serve as cases and those with medical conditions serve as controls. SETTING: A level I trauma center in a metropolitan area serving a predominately lower socioeconomic status population. PARTICIPANTS: Cases were 45 consecutive patients 11-18 years presenting to the emergency department with non-fatal firearm injury; controls were 50 age and gender matched patients presenting with acute medical problems. OUTCOME MEASURE: Odds ratios (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) as estimates of the magnitude of association between risk factors and non-fatal firearm injury. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, gender and socioeconomic status, multivariate analysis identified four risk factors independently associated with firearm injury: living with less than two parents (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 12.2), skipping class (OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.7 to 28.9), previous arrest (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.9 to 20.7), and being African-American (OR 4.2; 95%CI 1.4 to 14.9). CONCLUSION: Risk factors for adolescents sustaining a non-fatal firearm injury are sociodemographic and environmental, not just behavioral. Thus interventions that foster protective and supportive environments may help prevent firearm injuries.

Effect of out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation on survival and neurological outcome: a controlled clinical trial.

CONTEXT: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is widely used for airway management of children in the out-of-hospital setting, despite a lack of controlled trials demonstrating a positive effect on survival or neurological outcome. OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival and neurological outcomes of pediatric patients treated with bag-valve-mask ventilation (BVM) with those of patients treated with BVM followed by ETI. DESIGN: Controlled clinical trial, in which patients were assigned to interventions by calendar day from March 15, 1994, through January 1, 1997. SETTING: Two large, urban, rapid-transport emergency medical services (EMS) systems. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 830 consecutive patients aged 12 years or younger or estimated to weigh less than 40 kg who required airway management; 820 were available for follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to receive either BVM (odd days; n = 410) or BVM followed by ETI (even days; n = 420). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival to hospital discharge and neurological status at discharge from an acute care hospital compared by treatment group. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in survival between the BVM group (123/404 [30%]) and the ETI group (110/416 [26%]) (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.11) or in the rate of achieving a good neurological outcome (BVM, 92/404 [23%] vs ETI, 85/416 [20%]) (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.62-1.22). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the addition of out-of-hospital ETI to a paramedic scope of practice that already includes BVM did not improve survival or neurological outcome of pediatric patients treated in an urban EMS system.

Priorities for research in emergency medical services for children: results of a consensus conference.

OBJECTIVE: To arrive at a consensus on the priorities for future research in emergency medical services for children. METHODS: A consensus group was convened using the Rand-UCLA Consensus Process. The group took part in a 3-phase process. Round I involved reviewing a compendium of relevant research articles and answering a mailed questionnaire. Panel members were asked to prioritize topics on the basis of the 1993 Institute of Medicine Report on Emergency Medical Services for Children. Participants were asked to rate each topic based on the significance of the research, and whether the topic would (1) improve general knowledge (2), change behavior (3), improve health (4), decrease the cost of care, or (5) change public policy. A 4-point Likert scale was used. Participants were also asked if the research would require a multicenter study and if the research were feasible. Round II of the study involved a meeting of the panel, where the results of Round I were discussed and the topics were reprioritized. The topics were given a rank order and a final ranking was done in Round III. RESULTS: The panel considered a list of 32 topics; these were combined and reworded to give them more precise meaning. Several new topics were also added. Fifteen topics were given a rank order and placed within the 7 broad categories of the Institute of Medicine report. Clinical aspects of emergency care, systems organization, configuration, and operation and injury prevention were given high priority rankings. The first 5 topics were very close in point-rank order. CONCLUSION: The panel was able to develop a list of important topics for future research in emergency medical services for children that can be used by foundations, governmental agencies, and others in setting research agenda for such services.

Priorities for research in Emergency Medical Services for Children: results of a consensus conference. EMSC Research Agenda Consensus Committee, National EMSC Resource Alliance.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to arrive at a consensus on the priorities for future research in Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC). METHODS: A consensus group was convened using the Rand'-UCLA Consensus Process. The group took part in a 3-phase process. Phase I involved reviewing a compendium of relevant research articles and answering a mailed questionnaire. Panel members were asked to prioritize topics based on the 1993 Institute of Medicine Report on Emergency Medical Services for Children. Participants were asked to rate each topic based on the significance of the research and whether the topic would (1) improve general knowledge, (2) change behavior, (3) improve health, (4) decrease the cost of care, or (5) change public policy. A 4-point Likert scale was used. They were also asked in the research would require a multicenter study and if the research were feasible. Round II of the study involved a meeting of the panel, where the results of Round I were discussed and the topics reprioritized. The topics were given a rank order and a final ranking was done in Round III. RESULTS: The panel considered a list of 32 topics and these were combined and reworded to give them more precise meaning. Several new topics were also added. Fifteen topics were given a rank order and placed within the 7 broad categories of the Institute of Medicine report. Clinical aspects of emergency care systems organization, configuration and operation and injury prevention were given high priority rankings. The first 5 topics were very close in point-rank order. CONCLUSION: The panel was able to develop a list of important topics for future research in EMSC that can be used by foundations, governmental agencies, and others in setting a research agenda for EMSC.

Priorities for research in emergency medical services for children: results of a consensus conference.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To arrive at a consensus on the priorities for future research in emergency medical services for children. METHODS: A consensus group was convened using the Rand-UCLA Consensus Process. The group took part in a 3-phase process. Round 1 involved reviewing a compendium of relevant research articles and answering a mailed questionnaire. Panel members were asked to prioritize topics on the basis of the 1993 Institute of Medicine Report on Emergency Medical Services for Children. Participants were asked to rate each topic based on the significance of the research, and whether the topic would (1) improve general knowledge, (2) change behavior, (3) improve health, (4) decrease the cost of care, or (5) change public policy. A 4-point Likert scale was used. Participants were also asked if the research would require a multicenter study and if the research were feasible. Round 2 of the study involved a meeting of the panel, where the results of Round 1 were discussed and the topics were reprioritized. The topics were given a rank order and a final ranking was done in Round 3. RESULTS: The panel considered a list of 32 topics; these were combined and reworded to give them more precise meaning. Several new topics were also added. Fifteen topics were given a rank order and placed within the 7 broad categories of the Institute of Medicine report. Clinical aspects of emergency care, systems organization, configuration, and operation and injury prevention were given high priority rankings. The first 5 topics were very close in point-rank order. CONCLUSION: The panel was able to develop a list of important topics for future research in emergency medical services for children that can be used by foundations, governmental agencies, and others in setting a research agenda for such services.

Out-of-hospital care of pediatric patients.

The out-of-hospital care of children has seen significant changes in the past 10 years. Much work has yet to be done to research interventions and prevention strategies that have a positive effect on the outcome of children. Physicians, nurses, and out-of-hospital providers must serve as advocates for children in their communities.

Out-of-hospital intravenous access: unnecessary procedures and excessive cost.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance with criteria developed by the study investigators and supply costs associated with placement of i.v. lines and saline locks by paramedics in the out-of-hospital setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective consecutive case series at an urban base hospital. Patients were treated by paramedics using one base hospital for medical control during December 1995. Base hospital written records and taped patient calls were reviewed to determine actual i.v. access method used by paramedics, chief complaint, and whether fluid administration was ordered. Indicated method of i.v. access was determined for each patient based on predetermined criteria developed by the investigators. i.v. access methods were ranked by cost of supplies as follows: i.v. line (i.v.) > saline lock (SL) > no i.v. line (No i.v.). An assignment of concordant treatment was made when actual = indicated method, discordant-overtreatment when actual > indicated, and discordant-undertreatment when actual < indicated. RESULTS: 452 patients were treated via radio by the base hospital during the study period. 380 of 452 (84%) received an i.v.. 28 of 380 (7%) received fluid resuscitation in the field. 166 of 452 (37%) received concordant treatment; 253 (56%) discordant-overtreatment; and 33 (7%) discordant-undertreatment. Pediatric patients (< or =14 years of age) were more likely to be undertreated as compared with adults, 33% vs 3% (p < 0.001). Patients who had medical chief complaints were more likely to receive discordant-overtreatment as compared with patients who had trauma chief complaints, 61% vs 32% (p < 0.001). 73% of chest pain patients received discordant-overtreatment. Based on these data, the yearly cost of supplies used in i.v. access discordant-overtreatment was $13,735 for this base hospital and $560,000 for the Los Angeles County emergency medical services (EMS) system. 91% of the excess supply cost is due to patients' receiving an i.v. instead of a SL. CONCLUSION: Based on study criteria for utilization of i.v. lines vs SLs in the field, paramedics and base hospital personnel often provide discordant-overtreatment of patients by placement of an i.v. when a SL or No i.v. would suffice, resulting in unnecessary costs for EMS systems.

Rapid-sequence intubation of the pediatric patient. Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee of the American College of Emergency Physicians.

Airway compromise is the most common cause of death and severe morbidity in acutely ill and injured children. Rapid-sequence intubation (RSI) is a technique for emergency airway control designed to maximize successful endotracheal intubation while minimizing the adverse physiologic effects of this procedure. RSI requires familiarity with patient evaluation, airway-management techniques, sedation agents, neuromuscular blocking agents, additional adjunctive agents, and postintubation management techniques. Emergency physicians should use RSI techniques in the endotracheal intubation of critically ill children.

Emergency department quality assurance/improvement practices for the pediatric patient.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe emergency department quality assurance (QA)/improvement (QI) practices for pediatric patients. DESIGN: Mail survey of a cohort of emergency physicians. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric Section members of the American College of Emergency Physicians and a computer-generated random sample of general ACEP members. RESULTS: Pediatric Section and general ACEP physicians were mailed a 13-question QA survey. Of the 500 surveys distributed, 207 (41.4%) were returned. Three emergency care settings for pediatric patients seen in the ED were identified: (1) children's hospital ED (14%), (2) general ED with a separate area designated for the evaluation of pediatric patients (12%), and (3) general ED where pediatric and adult patients are evaluated in the same area (74%). Separate QA indicators were used to monitor care of the pediatric patients seen in the ED by 61% of the respondents; 39% used "adult" indicators only. High pediatric census was associated with pediatric representation on the ED QA/QI Committee, the use of separate pediatric indicators to monitor care of pediatric patients in the ED, the separation of pediatric and adult patient care areas and satisfaction with the respondent's ED QA/QI plan. CONCLUSION: The bulk of pediatric emergency patients are cared for in a general ED. Most ACEP members surveyed reported the use of separate QA indicators to monitor the care of pediatric patients seen in the ED. This survey provides the first description of QA/QI practices for pediatric patients by EDs nationwide.

Adenosine for the prehospital treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and feasibility of adenosine for the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) in the prehospital setting. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Large, urban, advanced life support emergency medical services system. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-nine adult patients with PSVT, as identified by paramedic personnel. Pregnant patients and those taking carbamazepine or dipyridamole were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Dose of 12 mg adenosine by rapid i.v. push followed by a 5-mL saline flush and a repeat dose of 12 mg adenosine i.v. push if the patient's rhythm remained unchanged. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Six-second lead II rhythm strips and vital signs were documented before and 2 minutes after the administration of adenosine. Demographic information, past medical history, medications, number of adenosine doses given, and complications were recorded by the paramedic on a case-report form. One hundred six of 129 (82%) of the case-report forms included the rhythm strips from before and after adenosine administration. Actual initial rhythms were determined by a consensus panel. The initial rhythms were PSVT in 79% (84 of 106) of patients, atrial fibrillation in 12% (13 of 106), sinus tachycardia in 5% (five of 106), atrial flutter in 2% (two of 106), and ventricular tachycardia in 2% (two of 106). Eighty-five percent (71 of 84) of patients in PSVT were successfully converted to sinus rhythms; four (5.6%) of these patients required a second 12-mg dose. One patient in atrial fibrillation spontaneously converted to normal sinus rhythm and one patient in ventricular tachycardia converted after adenosine. All other patients not initially in PSVT remained in their initial rhythm. Complications occurred in 12 of 129 patients and included chest pain (five), flushing (three), shortness of breath (two), nausea (one), anxiety (one), dizziness (one), headache (one), and seizure (one). All complications were transient and required no treatment. Prior history of PSVT was the only variable associated with a higher rate of conversion (P = .029). CONCLUSION: Paramedics are able to accurately identify PSVT using a single lead. Adenosine is safe and effective treatment for PSVT in the prehospital setting. This series is the largest prehospital study of adenosine use to date.