Visually mediated functioning improves following treatment of hoarding disorder.

BACKGROUND: Hoarding disorder (HD) is a highly debilitating psychiatric disorder that affects 2-6% of adults. Neuropsychological deficits in visual memory, detection, and categorization have been reported in HD. To date, no study has examined the relationship between neurocognitive functioning and treatment for HD. We aim to determine the association between neurocognitive functioning and treatment outcomes, as well as the impact of HD-specific treatment on cognitive functioning. METHODS: 323 individuals with HD were randomized to 20 weeks of peer- or clinician-led group behavioral treatment. 242 participants completed pre- and post-treatment neuropsychological testing covering eight neurocognitive domains. Rates of cognitive impairment (CI) were assessed for each neurocognitive domain. The association of baseline neurocognitive function on treatment response was examined using multiple regression. MANOVA and post-hoc tests were used to determine neurocognitive performance change pre- to post treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of participants had CI on ≥1 cognitive domain. There was no significant effect of pre-treatment neurocognitive functioning on treatment outcome. Post-treatment improvements were observed in visual memory, visual detection, decision making, information processing speed, visuospatial processing, attention/working memory (p≤.001). Declines in performance were found in visual reaction time and categorization. LIMITATIONS: This was a non-inferiority trial to examine two treatment types with no normative comparison group. Treatment seeking individuals are more likely to be insightful, motivated, and have other features which limit generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of cognitive impairment in HD are similar to previous reports. Pre-treatment neurocognitive functioning did not impact treatment response. Neuropsychological functioning improved across multiple domains following targeted treatment.

Randomised clinical trial of community-based peer-led and psychologist-led group treatment for hoarding disorder.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for hoarding disorder is typically performed by mental health professionals, potentially limiting access to care in underserved areas. AIMS: We aimed to conduct a non-inferiority trial of group peer-facilitated therapy (G-PFT) and group psychologist-led cognitive-behavioural therapy (G-CBT). METHOD: We randomised 323 adults with hording disorder 15 weeks of G-PFT or 16 weeks of G-CBT and assessed at baseline, post-treatment and longitudinally (≥3 months post-treatment: mean 14.4 months, range 3-25). Predictors of treatment response were examined. RESULTS: G-PFT (effect size 1.20) was as effective as G-CBT (effect size 1.21; between-group difference 1.82 points, t = -1.71, d.f. = 245, P = 0.04). More homework completion and ongoing help from family and friends resulted in lower severity scores at longitudinal follow-up (t = 2.79, d.f. = 175, P = 0.006; t = 2.89, d.f. = 175, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Peer-led groups were as effective as psychologist-led groups, providing a novel treatment avenue for individuals without access to mental health professionals. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: C.A.M. has received grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and travel reimbursement and speakers' honoraria from the Tourette Association of America (TAA), as well as honoraria and travel reimbursement from the NIH for serving as an NIH Study Section reviewer. K.D. receives research support from the NIH and honoraria and travel reimbursement from the NIH for serving as an NIH Study Section reviewer. R.S.M. receives research support from the National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Aging, the Hillblom Foundation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals (research grant) and the Alzheimer's Association. R.S.M. has also received travel support from the National Institute of Mental Health for Workshop participation. J.Y.T. receives research support from the NIH, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the California Tobacco Related Research Program, and honoraria and travel reimbursement from the NIH for serving as an NIH Study Section reviewer. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Comparison of a peer facilitated support group to cognitive behavior therapy: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for hoarding disorder.

Although individual and group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the standard treatment approach for hoarding disorder (HD), it requires trained mental health professionals with specialization in HD. There is a need to offer additional options and services due to the limited number of professionals with advanced training, combined with the high prevalence rate of individuals with HD. A structured support group led by trained facilitators or lay professionals using a facilitator's manual and participant workbook (Buried in Treasures or BiT), addresses this need and increases accessibility. Prior studies of BiT groups have shown decreased hoarding symptoms. Only one retrospective study compared BiT and CBT outcomes in a naturalistic setting and showed no difference. Thus, a well-powered randomized controlled trial is needed to directly compare these forms of treatment. This paper presents a non-inferiority controlled trial protocol that compares group CBT to group BiT. Three hundred participants with HD, 18years or older, are being recruited for a 16-week treatment study. Participants are randomly assigned to either the CBT or BiT group. The primary outcome is reduction in hoarding symptom severity. Secondary outcomes include reduction in other indices of hoarding symptomology, including functional impairment, physical clutter, cognition, and changes in neuropsychological functioning.

Treating Hoarding Disorder in a real-world setting: Results from the Mental Health Association of San Francisco.

Hoarding Disorder (HD) is associated with substantial distress, impairment, and individual and societal costs. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) tailored to HD is the best-studied form of treatment and can be led by mental health professionals or by non-professionals (peers) with specific training. No previous study has directly compared outcomes for therapist-led and peer-led groups, and none have examined the effectiveness of these groups in a real-world setting. We used retrospective data to compare psychologist-led CBT groups (G-CBT) to groups led by peer facilitators using the Buried in Treasures workbooks (G-BiT) in individuals who sought treatment for HD from the Mental Health Association of San Francisco. The primary outcome was change in Hoarding Severity Scale scores. Approximate costs per participant were also examined. Both G-CBT and G-BiT showed improvement consistent with previous reports (22% improvement overall). After controlling for baseline group characteristics, there were no significant differences in outcomes between G-CBT and G-BiT. For G-CBT, where additional outcome data were available, functional impairment and severity of hoarding symptoms improved to a similar degree as compared to previous G-CBT studies, while hoarding-related cognition improved to a lesser degree (also consistent with previous studies). G-BiT cost approximately $100 less per participant than did G-CBT.

Diminishing the self-stigma of mental illness by coming out proud.

This randomized controlled trial examined the impact of the Coming Out Proud (COP) program on self-stigma, stigma stress, and depression. Research participants who experienced mental health challenges were randomly assigned to a three session COP program (n=51) or a waitlist control (n=75). Outcome measures that assessed the progressively harmful stages of self-stigma, stigma stress appraisals, and depression were administered at pre-test, post-test, and one-month follow-up. People completing COP showed significant improvement at post-test and follow-up in the more harmful aspects of self-stigma compared to the control group. COP participants also showed improvements in stigma stress appraisals. Women participating in COP showed significant post-test and follow-up reductions in depression after COP compared to the control group. Men did not show this effect. Future research should determine whether these benefits also enhance attitudes related to recovery, empowerment, and self-determination.

The California Assessment of Stigma Change: A Short Battery to Measure Improvements in the Public Stigma of Mental Illness.

Contact-based anti-stigma programs delivered by people with lived experience yields stigma change. This study examined psychometrics and sensitivity of the California Assessment of Stigma Change (CASC). CASC assesses prejudicial beliefs, affirming attitudes, and willingness to seek mental healthcare. Four samples, two high school groups, college students, and hotel desk clerks, completed CASC immediately before and after a contact-based program. Two samples completed follow-up: one of the high school groups and the college students. CASC assesses stigma with a 9-item Attribution Questionnaire (AQ9), personal empowerment with a 3-item scale (ES), recovery orientation with a 3-item scale (RS), and psychological help seeking willingness with a 6-item questionnaire (CSQ). Internal consistencies ranged adequate to satisfactory for AQ9, ES, and CSQ. Concurrent validity was partially supported. Change sensitivity was demonstrated among at least half of each construct's analyses. CASC seems a psychometrically valid way to efficiently monitor attitudinal and care seeking intentions changes. Outcome monitoring can strengthen contact-based anti-stigma programs, an emerging evidence-based practice.

Key ingredients to contact-based stigma change: a cross-validation.

OBJECTIVE: Contact-based antistigma programs seemingly have a larger and more sustained impact than educational strategies. Previous qualitative research of advocates with lived experiences yielded 32 key ingredients of contact-based programs comprising 5 categories. This study sought an independent sample's feedback of the 32 ingredients. METHODS: One hundred advocates with lived experience of mental health conditions who have led, coordinated, and/or delivered antistigma presentations completed an online survey to rank importance of key ingredients. RESULTS: Analysis of rank distributions showed most important ingredients in program categories: (a) design: face-to-face presentations, audience discussion; (b) target: specific group identified (e.g., employers), assessment completed with targets to derive stigma change goals relevant to needs; (c) staff: presenters are people with lived experience; (d) message: message includes on the-way-up stories; and (e) evaluation/follow-up: post-presentation follow-up actions discussed with targets. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Future research hopes to yield a fidelity measure for contact-based programs.

The California schedule of key ingredients for contact-based antistigma programs.

OBJECTIVE: A major public health priority has been to eliminate stigma's egregious effects on life opportunities for people with mental illnesses. Research shows contact-based antistigma programs are among the most effective. Such findings call for clarity to define the components of consumer-directed antistigma programs. This article represents community-based participatory research (CBPR) and the first step of a mixed methods design to describe the active ingredients comprising these kinds of programs. METHOD: CBPR investigators developed an interview guide and subsequently facilitated four focus groups to identify key components. Participants included antistigma experts with lived experience. Using grounded theory, two independent raters identified 641 discrete themes. Two additional coders then sorted themes into constructs representing key ingredients of contact-based programs. Coders agreed upon 198 constructs and then grouped them into a hierarchical model of key ingredients in consumer-directed stigma change. RESULTS: Five criteria represent indicators of successful consumer-directed programs: (a) program design-factors necessary for trained presenters to facilitate programs; (b) targeting-tailored presentation congruent with target's goal; (c) staffing-facilitators and leadership are diverse people with lived experience; (d) messaging-presentation discusses struggles and recovery from mental health challenges; and (e) follow-up and evaluation-assessment of sustained audience change. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study identified key ingredients of consumer-directed antistigma programs. Part two of the mixed methods design, a quantitative cross-validation study, will yield a sound fidelity measure.

Self-stigma of mental illness scale--short form: reliability and validity.

The internalization of public stigma by persons with serious mental illnesses may lead to self-stigma, which harms self-esteem, self-efficacy, and empowerment. Previous research has evaluated a hierarchical model that distinguishes among stereotype awareness, agreement, application to self, and harm to self with the 40-item Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (SSMIS). This study addressed SSMIS critiques (too long, contains offensive items that discourages test completion) by strategically omitting half of the original scale's items. Here we report reliability and validity of the 20-item short form (SSMIS-SF) based on data from three previous studies. Retained items were rated less offensive by a sample of consumers. Results indicated adequate internal consistencies for each subscale. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed subscale means progressively diminished from awareness to harm. In support of its validity, the harm subscale was found to be inversely and significantly related to self-esteem, self-efficacy, empowerment, and hope. After controlling for level of depression, these relationships remained significant with the exception of the relation between empowerment and harm SSMIS-SF subscale. Future research with the SSMIS-SF should evaluate its sensitivity to change and its stability through test-rest reliability.

Filling the implementation gap: a community-academic partnership approach to early intervention in psychosis.

AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the development of a sustainable community early psychosis programme created through an academic-community partnership in the United States to other parties interested in implementing early psychosis services founded upon evidence-based practices within community settings. METHODS: The service was developed around a sustainable core of key components, founded upon evidence-based practice, with additional flexible elements that could be adapted to the needs of the individual commissioning county. This paper describes the ways in which funding was sourced and secured as well as the partnerships developed through this process. RESULTS: Successful development of the Prevention and Recovery from Early Psychosis (PREP) programme in San Francisco County, California. PREP clinicians have received extensive training in the evidence-based approaches that are available through the programme and treated 30 clients and their families in the first year of operation. CONCLUSIONS: Development of a sustainable community programme of this type in a non-universal health-care setting, which is historically seen as non-integrated, required extensive partnering with agencies familiar with local resources. Implementation of the community-academic partnership bridged the gap between research and practice with successful integration of fidelity practice at the community level. The community partners were effective in sourcing funding and allocating resources, while the academic side of the partnership provided training in evidence-based models and oversight of clinical implementation of the model. Stringent evaluation of the impact of the service is our next focus.