[Consensus document of the Mexican Society of Cardiology for post-COVID-19 cardiovascular clinical follow-up]. / Consenso de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cardiología para el seguimiento clínico cardiovascular post-COVID-19.

Background: The cardiovascular sequelae by the SARS-COV-2 infection is prevalent in a significant portion of the recovered patients from the acute presentation of the SARS-COV-2. Actually, the clinic cardiac control of the post-acute COVID syndrome has been working out without a well-established protocol, making the appropriate diagnosis of the cardiac diseases produced by the different damage mechanisms from COVID-19. Objectives: Standardize cardiovascular care and the follow up of COVID-19 survivors in the function on disease severity and identify patients who develop SPC-19A for timely care. Materials and methods: Through an extensive bibliographic review, this article has the purpose of provide the necessary information to make possible the early diagnosis and following of the cardiac complications that has been recorded trough the months after the acute disease from COVID-19.

Antecedentes: Las secuelas cardiovasculares ocasionadas por la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) son frecuentes en una importante proporción de los pacientes recuperados del cuadro agudo de la enfermedad. Hasta el día de hoy el seguimiento cardiológico del síndrome agudo post-COVID-19 (SPC-19A) se ha realizado de forma heterogénea y sin directrices que permitan al clínico identificar oportunamente los cambios que preceden a enfermedades cardiológicas derivadas de los distintos mecanismos de daño inducidos por COVID-19. Objetivos: Estandarizar la atención y seguimiento cardiovascular de los supervivientes de COVID-19 en función de la gravedad de la enfermedad e identificar a los pacientes que desarrollen SPC-19A para su atención oportuna. Material y métodos: Mediante una revisión extensa de bibliografía, este documento tiene la intención de unificar y proporcionar la información necesaria para diagnosticar y dar seguimiento a las complicaciones cardiacas que se han documentado en los meses posteriores a la resolución de la COVID-19 aguda.

Clinical Spectrum and Long-term Outcome of 183 Cases of Ebstein's Anomaly, Experience of Mexican Population.

BACKGROUND: Ebstein's anomaly (EA) is a myopathy of the right ventricle that causes a variable spectrum of tricuspid valve delamination failure with diverse clinical and anatomical presentation. We reviewed our data of EA to establish an association between clinical and echocardiographic findings with mortality. METHODS: We divided patients in infants, Children/adolescents (Ch/A), and adults, according to age of presentation. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were compared among groups. Multivariate analysis was performed for mortality. Survival analysis was plotted using Kaplan Meier curves. RESULTS: Cyanosis, severe forms of AE and heart failure were more frequent among infants, arrhythmias in Ch/A and stroke among adults. Surgery was performed in 71 patients; infants had higher mortality and early complications. We found that the predicted mortality at 40 years of age in the three groups was significantly different (log rank test, p <0.0001): Infants: 38%, Ch/A 16 and 4% in adults. Multivariate model in surgical group showed that progressive drop of right ventricular fractional shortening (RVFS) predicts a higher mortality risk. In the non-surgical group, low RVFS and cyanosis were significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: EA in infants is linked to higher morbidity and mortality, while arrhythmias predominate in Ch/A and stroke in adults. In general, stroke is frequent in patients with EA, some prevention alternative must be implemented. Right ventricular dysfunction is very important in EA and is associated with high mortality. It must be subject of discussion the planning of the type of surgery or even in the decision of to preclude surgical treatment.

Impact of Surgery in Ebstein's Anomaly Using Current Surgical Criteria.

BACKGROUND: In Ebstein's anomaly (EA) current surgical criteria may not translate into better long-term survival. The aim of this study was therefore to determine if surgical treatment for EA increases survival, and to analyze factors associated with mortality.Methods and Results:A retrospective study was carried out involving 103 patients with surgical indication using current criteria, comparing operated (n=49; 47.5%) and non-operated patients (n=54; 52.4%); the severity of disease was similar in all cases. Overall follow-up was 12 years (range, 1-49 years). There were no differences in mortality: in the surgical and non-surgical groups, survival at 10 years was 92.8% vs. 90.7%; 20 years, 85.7% vs. 81.0%; and 30 years, 78.5% vs. 72.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis right ventricular fractional shortening (RVFS) was associated with mortality in both groups. Decreasing RVFS was associated with worse survival according to severity: when RVFS was <20%, survival at 20, 40 and 60 years was 58%, 39%, and 12.5%, respectively (P<0.0013). Left ventricular ejection fraction also correlated with survival (P<0.0013). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery did not translate into benefit in terms of survival, and this was clearly associated with RV function; therefore this should be a key factor in the surgical decision making.