Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
Front Neurol ; 13: 941775, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36172031

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to examine the epidemiology of seizures, clinical outcomes, and antiseizure medication treatment patterns among seizure patients treated in United States hospitals. Design: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using data from a large geographically diverse hospital discharge database. Setting: 860 acute care hospitals in the United States. Participants: Patients aged ≥18 years with an outpatient emergency department or inpatient visit between 1 July 2016-31 December 2019 were included. Intervention: None. Main outcomes and measures: Key outcomes included prevalence of seizure, seizure type, admission point of origin, intensive care unit admission, discharge status, and injectable antiseizure medication utilization. Seizures were identified by the International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. Results: Among 36,598,627 unique emergency department outpatients (72,372,464 outpatient visits) and 16,543,592 unique inpatients (24,923,489 inpatient admissions) analyzed, seizure was present in 2.1% of outpatients (1.87% of outpatient visits) and 4.9% of inpatients (4.8% of inpatient admissions). In overall seizure patients, 49.1% were unclassified, 4.4% had generalized onset, 2.9% had focal onset, and 42.8% were categorized as other (including 38.5% with convulsion). Among seizure-associated inpatient admissions, <1% were transferred directly from skilled nursing facility or other long-term care facilities but 22.7% were discharged to such facilities. Nearly a third (31%) of all inpatients were admitted to ICU. About 88.3% of patients with injectable ASM use had monotherapy, 4.6% had polytherapy with 1 day or multiple non-consecutive days of overlap, and 7.0% had polytherapy with ≥2 consecutive days of overlap. The percentage of patients with no step down to any oral ASM ranged between 34.0-57.0%. Conclusions: Seizures affect a substantial number of hospital-based emergency department outpatient and inpatient encounters and are associated with poor clinical outcomes and significant healthcare burden. Concomitant use of injectable ASMs is uncommon and a high percentage of IV ASM users with a diagnosis of seizure had no step down to oral therapy. Relevance: The study findings may inform clinicians and hospital decision makers about current clinical practice and burden of seizures and identify areas to improve overall outcomes for patients with seizures.

2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(11): 1625-1633, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35272728

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the 180-day cumulative incidence of culture-confirmed Staphylococcus aureus infections after elective pediatric surgeries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study utilizing the Premier Healthcare database (PHD). SETTING: Inpatient and hospital-based outpatient elective surgical discharges. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients <18 years who underwent surgery during elective admissions between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2015, at any of 181 PHD hospitals reporting microbiology results. METHODS: In total, 74 surgical categories were defined using ICD-9-CM and CPT procedure codes. Microbiology results and ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes defined S. aureus infection types: bloodstream infection (BSI), surgical site infection (SSI), and other types (urinary tract, respiratory, and all other). Cumulative postsurgical infection incidence was calculated as the number of infections divided by the number of discharges with qualifying elective surgeries. RESULTS: Among 11,874 inpatient surgical discharges, 180-day S. aureus infection incidence was 1.79% overall (1.00% SSI, 0.35% BSI, 0.45% other). Incidence was highest among children <2 years of age (2.76%) and lowest for those 10-17 years (1.49%). Among 50,698 outpatient surgical discharges, incidence was 0.36% overall (0.23% SSI, 0.05% BSI, 0.08% others); it was highest among children <2 years of age (0.57%) and lowest for those aged 10-17 years (0.30%). MRSA incidence was significantly higher after inpatient surgeries (0.68%) than after outpatient surgeries (0.14%; P < .0001). Overall, the median days to S. aureus infection was longer after outpatient surgery than after inpatient surgery (39 vs. 31 days; P = .0116). CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate the burden of postoperative S. aureus infections in the pediatric population, particularly among young children. These results underscore the need for continued infection prevention efforts and longer-term surveillance after surgery.


Assuntos
Infecções Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus aureus , Humanos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Incidência
3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(1): ofab498, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34984212

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to characterize hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and describe their real-world treatment patterns and outcomes over time. METHODS: Adult patients hospitalized on May 1, 2020-December 31, 2020 with a discharge diagnosis of COVID-19 were identified from the Premier Healthcare Database. Patient and hospital characteristics, treatments, baseline severity based on oxygen support, length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, and mortality were examined. RESULTS: The study included 295657 patients (847 hospitals), with median age of 66 (interquartile range, 54-77) years. Among each set of demographic comparators, the majority were male, white, and over 65. Approximately 85% had no supplemental oxygen charges (NSOc) or low-flow oxygen (LFO) at baseline, whereas 75% received no more than NSOc or LFO as maximal oxygen support at any time during hospitalization. Remdesivir (RDV) and corticosteroid treatment utilization increased over time. By December, 50% were receiving RDV and 80% were receiving corticosteroids. A higher proportion initiated COVID-19 treatments within 2 days of hospitalization in December versus May (RDV, 87% vs 40%; corticosteroids, 93% vs 62%; convalescent plasma, 68% vs 26%). There was a shift toward initiating RDV in patients on NSOc or LFO (68.0% [May] vs 83.1% [December]). Median LOS decreased over time. Overall mortality was 13.5% and it was highest for severe patients (invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [IMV/ECMO], 53.7%; high-flow oxygen/noninvasive ventilation [HFO/NIV], 32.2%; LFO, 11.7%; NSOc, 7.3%). The ICU use decreased, whereas mortality decreased for NSOc and LFO. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical management of COVID-19 is rapidly evolving. This large observational study found that use of evidence-based treatments increased from May to December 2020, whereas improvement in outcomes occurred over this time-period.

4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(1): 64-71, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34034839

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the 180-day incidence of Staphylococcus aureus infections following orthopedic surgeries using microbiology cultures. DESIGN: Retrospective observational epidemiology study. SETTING: National administrative hospital database. PATIENTS: Adult patients with an elective admission undergoing orthopedic surgeries in the inpatient and hospital-based outpatient settings discharged between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2015. METHODS: Patients were identified from 181 hospitals reporting microbiology results to the Premier Healthcare Database. Orthopedic surgeries were defined using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure and current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Microbiology cultures and ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes identified surgical site infections (SSIs), bloodstream infections (BSIs), and other infections associated postoperatively (eg, respiratory and urinary tract infections). RESULTS: Among 359,268 inpatient orthopedic surgical encounters, the S. aureus infection incidence was 1.13%: SSI, 0.68%; BSI, 0.28%; and other types, 0.17%. Among 292,011 outpatient encounters, the S. aureus incidence was 0.78%: SSI, 0.55%; BSI, 0.12%; and other types, 0.11%. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections accounted for 46% and 44% in the respective settings. Plastic/hand-limb reattachment and amputation had the highest overall S. aureus incidence in both settings. S. aureus was the most commonly isolated microorganism among culture-confirmed SSIs (48.0%) and BSIs (35.0%), followed by other Enterobacteriaceae (14.0%) for SSIs and Escherichia spp (12.5%) for BSIs. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that S. aureus infections continue to be an important contributor to the burden of postoperative infections after inpatient and outpatient orthopedic procedures.


Assuntos
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Incidência , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(12): 2238-2242, 2022 07 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34534276

RESUMO

After an initial decline from April through June 2020 (from 22.2% to 11.9%), adjusted in-hospital mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) inpatients peaked twice and was significantly higher than June 2020 for subsequent months except in July and October 2020. Adjusted mortality trends differed across age groups between November 2020 and February 2021.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Front Neurol ; 12: 760855, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34912285

RESUMO

Background: Seizures are common among hospitalized patients. Levetiracetam (LEV), a synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) ligand, is a common intravenous (IV) anti-seizure medication option in hospitals. Brivaracetam (BRV), a selective SV2A ligand for treatment of focal seizures in patients ≥16 years, has greater binding affinity, higher lipophilicity, and faster brain entry than IV LEV. Differences in clinical outcomes and associated costs between IV BRV and IV LEV in treating hospitalized patients with seizure remain unknown. Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes, costs, and healthcare resource utilization between patients with seizure treated with IV BRV and those with IV LEV within hospital setting. Design/Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using chargemaster data from 210 United States hospitals in Premier Healthcare Database. Adult patients (age ≥18 years) treated intravenously with LEV or BRV (with or without BZD) and a seizure discharge diagnosis between July 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019 were included. The cohorts were propensity score-matched 4:1 on baseline characteristics. Outcomes included intubation rates, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of stay (LOS), all-cause and seizure-related readmission, total hospitalization cost, and in-hospital mortality. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine the association between treatment and main outcomes adjusting for unbalanced confounders. Results: A total of 450 patients were analyzed (IV LEV, n = 360 vs. IV BRV, n = 90). Patients treated with IV BRV had lower crude prevalence of ICU admission (14.4 vs. 24.2%, P < 0.05), 30-day all-cause readmission (1.1 vs. 6.4%, P = 0.06), seizure-related 30-day readmission (0 vs. 4.2%, P < 0.05), similar mean total hospitalization costs ($13,715 vs. $13,419, P = 0.91), intubation (0 vs. 1.1%, P = 0.59), and in-hospital mortality (4.4 vs. 3.9%, P = 0.77). The adjusted odds for ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.31, 1.16; P = 0.13), 30-day all-cause readmission (aOR = 0.17; 95% CI:0.02, 1.24; P = 0.08), and in-hospital mortality (aOR = 1.15; 95% CI:0.37, 3.58, P = 0.81) were statistically similar between comparison groups. Conclusion: The use of IV BRV may provide an alternative to IV LEV for management of seizures in hospital setting due to lower or comparable prevalence of ICU admission, intubation, and 30-day seizure-related readmission. Additional studies with greater statistical power are needed to confirm these findings.

7.
Oncologist ; 26(11): e2002-e2012, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34327774

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) among patients with cancer, there is substantial interest in understanding clinical and economic outcomes and management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). PATIENTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using Premier Healthcare Database, a U.S. national hospital discharge database, from March 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017. The database comprises more than 880 million inpatient and hospital-based outpatient encounters, with more than 200 million unique patients reported by 966 hospitals. Patients with four solid tumors known to benefit from ICI therapy were included. The list of irAEs assessed was defined a priori per American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical guidelines for irAE management. Baseline irAE-related inpatient and outpatient visits were defined as the first inpatient or hospital-based outpatient visit with discharge diagnosis of any irAE of interest following confirmed ICI usage within 90 days prior to the baseline visit. Patients were followed for 90 days after baseline irAE-related inpatient discharge date or outpatient visit date to assess irAE-related inpatient admissions, all-cause in-hospital mortality, ICI reinitiation, and to determine costs and health care resource utilization. RESULTS: Records from 673,957 patients with four tumor types were reviewed for ICI therapy. Of 13,030 patients receiving ICIs, approximately 40% experienced at least one irAE, with a total of 10,121 irAEs occurring within 90 days of the ICI visit. The most frequent (>1,000 events) irAEs were anemia, impaired ventricular function with heart failure and vasculitis, thrombocytopenia, thyroid conditions, and peripheral edema. As might be expected, compared with those with baseline irAE-related outpatient visits, patients with baseline irAE-related inpatient visits had a significantly higher percentage of irAE-related inpatient admissions (23% vs. 14%) and all-cause in-hospital mortality (22% vs. 6%) and lower reinitiation of ICI therapy (31% vs. 71%). Baseline irAE-related inpatient visits had significantly higher mean costs ($29,477 vs. $5,718) with longer hospital stays (12.6 vs. 7.8 days). CONCLUSION: Findings from a U.S. national hospital discharge database suggest that irAEs in patients treated with ICIs are common, occur in multiples and with greater frequency in those with pre-existing comorbidities. Those with inpatient admissions have poorer outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The present work addressed the knowledge gap in understanding real-world outcomes of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients who experienced irAEs had significantly higher baseline comorbidities and were more likely to have immune-related or immune-compromised comorbid conditions. Patients with baseline irAE-related hospitalizations were more likely to be rehospitalized and to experience in-hospital mortality and less likely to reinitiate ICI treatment. Real-world patients are more diverse than clinical trials, and clinicians should consider both the efficacy and safety profile of ICI treatments, especially for patients with comorbidity conditions. Close monitoring is needed after patients have experienced an irAE.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias , Bases de Dados Factuais , Hospitalização , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 13: 213-226, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33790597

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer with poor prognosis. This study compared patient characteristics, comorbidities, adverse events (AEs), treatment persistence, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs in patients with metastatic MCC (mMCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or recommended chemotherapy per 2018 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted using data from 3/1/2015 through 12/31/2017 from the Premier Healthcare Database, a US hospital discharge database. The study included patients aged ≥12 years with International Classification of Diseases Codes for MCC and metastasis, categorized by their first treatment (index) during the study period (ICI or NCCN-recommended chemotherapy [chemotherapy]). Patient, hospital, and visit characteristics were assessed at the index date and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score and comorbidities during a 6-month look-back period. Clinical outcomes, including AEs and treatment persistence were assessed over 90 days and HRU and costs over 180 days post-index. RESULTS: Of 75 patients with mMCC receiving ICIs (n=37) or chemotherapy (n=38), mean age was ≈73 years, and 21.3% had a history of immune-related (IR) conditions. Overall, ICI- and chemotherapy-treated patients were similar in most baseline characteristics, IR comorbidities, and CCI score. However, more ICI patients (46%) than chemotherapy patients (26%) persisted on treatment over 90-day follow-up, odds ratio (95% CI): 2.04 (0.93, 4.47), P=0.07. Over 180-day follow-up, 33% of patients had an inpatient admission with mean length of stay (LOS) ≈2 days shorter for ICI vs chemotherapy (not statistically significant). Total costs, primarily driven by pharmacy costs, were higher for ICIs than chemotherapy; other departmental costs were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, patients with mMCC receiving ICIs had higher treatment persistence over 90 days, shorter inpatient LOS and similar departmental cost (excluding pharmacy cost) than those receiving chemotherapy.

9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): e2635-e2646, 2021 11 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32634829

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of postsurgical infections, national estimates of these infections after elective surgeries based on microbiology data are limited. This study assessed cumulative 180-day postsurgical S. aureus incidence in real-world hospital settings. METHODS: A retrospective study of adults (≥18 years) undergoing inpatient or hospital-based outpatient elective surgeries from 1/7/2010-30/6/2015 at hospitals (N = 181) reporting microbiology results in the Premier Healthcare Database (PHD). 86 surgical categories were identified from the National Healthcare Safety Network procedures. We classified positive S. aureus cultures using a hierarchy (bloodstream [BSI], surgical site [SSI], and all other types [urinary tract, respiratory, other/unknown site]) and calculated incidence (number of infections divided by the number of elective surgery discharges). We estimated national infection case volumes by multiplying incidence by national inpatient elective surgical discharge estimates using the entire PHD and weights based on hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Following 884 803 inpatient elective surgical discharges, 180-day S. aureus infection incidence was 1.35% (0.30% BSI, 0.74% SSI no BSI, 0.32% all other types only). Among 1 116 994 hospital-based outpatient elective surgical discharges, 180-day S. aureus incidence was 1.19% (0.25% BSI, 0.75% SSI no BSI, 0.19% all other types only). Methicillin resistance was observed in ~45% of the S. aureus infections. We estimated 55 764 S. aureus postsurgical infections occurred annually in the US following 4.2 million elective inpatient surgical discharges. CONCLUSIONS: The high burden of S. aureus infections after both inpatient and outpatient elective surgeries highlights the continued need for surveillance and novel infection prevention efforts.


Assuntos
Infecções Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus aureus , Adulto , Hospitais , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia
10.
Int Wound J ; 17(6): 1924-1934, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32830460

RESUMO

Pressure injuries are one of the most common and costly complications occurring in US hospitals. With up to 3 million patients affected each year, hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) place a substantial burden on the US healthcare system. In the current study, US hospital discharge records from 9.6 million patients during the period from October 2009 through September 2014 were analysed to determine the incremental cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries by stage. Of the 46 108 patients experiencing HAPI, 16.3% had Stage 1, 41.0% had Stage 2, 7.0% had Stage 3, 2.8% had Stage 4, 7.3% had unstageable, 14.6% had unspecified, and 10.9% had missing staging information. In propensity score-adjusted models, increasing HAPI severity was significantly associated with higher total costs and increased overall length of stay when compared with patients not experiencing a HAPI at the index hospitalisation. The average incremental cost for a HAPI was $21 767. Increasing HAPI severity was significantly associated with greater risk of in-hospital mortality at the index hospitalisation compared with patients with no HAPI, as well as 1.5 to 2 times greater risk of 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmissions. Additionally, increasing HAPI severity was significantly associated with increasing risk of other hospital-acquired conditions, such as pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and venous thromboembolism during the index hospitalisation. By preventing pressure injuries, hospitals have the potential to reduce unreimbursed treatment expenditures, reduce length of stay, minimise readmissions, prevent associated complications, and improve overall outcomes for their patients.


Assuntos
Alta do Paciente , Úlcera por Pressão , Hospitais , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Readmissão do Paciente , Úlcera por Pressão/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
11.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 23(7): 48, 2019 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31147838

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Total patient care is of extreme importance during the administration of anesthesia. Proper care of the eye is necessary during all anesthetic administrations, especially during the administration of general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care. By paying attention to details, the likelihood of an occurrence of eye injuries is reduced. RECENT FINDINGS: Though perioperative eye injuries are rare during general anesthesia, they do account for 2-3% of claims against anesthesiologists. Ocular injuries may occur during general anesthesia even when tape has been utilized for eye closure. Corneal abrasions are the most common injuries that have been attributed to direct trauma to the eye, exposure keratopathy, or chemical injury. Using a hydrogel patch during general anesthesia is also associated with more frequent corneal injury than previously thought. Prevention of anesthesia-related eye injuries assumes a high priority since the eye is one of the major sense organs of the body. The eye can be damaged during anesthesia for both non-ophthalmic and ophthalmic surgeries.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Lesões da Córnea/diagnóstico , Lesões da Córnea/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Anestesiologia/métodos , Humanos , Período Pós-Operatório
12.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ; 35(Suppl 1): S35-S39, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31142957

RESUMO

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept, sometimes referred to as "fast track", "accelerated," or "Rapid Recovery" surgery, was first introduced in 1997. The concept of ERAS targets factors that delay postoperative recovery such as surgical stress and organ dysfunction. ERAS protocols or programs are a care package of evidence-based interventions used in a multimodal and coordinated clinical care pathway. They represent a multidisciplinary approach directed to reducing postoperative complications, shortening length of hospital stay, improving patient satisfaction, and accelerating recovery. ERAS was initially centered on abdominal and colorectal surgery patients; however, ERAS protocols have been widely extended to include other specialties. Orthopedic surgery, particularly elective hip and knee arthroplasty is one of such areas where ERAS principles have been adopted. It has been associated with reduced length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and improved functional recovery. The common interventions used in orthopedic ERAS programs have been divided into those performed in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care. A PubMed literature search was performed for articles that included the terms enhanced recovery and orthopedic surgery. In this article, we summarized the clinical application of ERAS and highlighted the key elements that characterize an enhanced recovery program.

13.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 23(4): 28, 2019 Mar 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30868281

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has become a widespread topic in perioperative medicine over the past 20 years. The goals of ERAS are to improve patient outcomes and perioperative experience, reduce length of hospital stay, minimize complications, and reduce cost. Interventions and factors before, during, and after surgery all potentially play a role with the cumulative effect being superior quality of patient care. RECENT FINDINGS: Preoperatively, patient and family education, optimization of nutritional status, and antibiotic prophylaxis all improve outcomes. Recovery is also expedited by the use of multimodal analgesia, regional anesthesia, and opioid reducing approaches. Intraoperatively, the anesthesiologist can have an impact by using less-invasive monitors appropriately to guide fluid and hemodynamic management as well as maintaining normothermia. Postoperatively, early enteral feeding, mobilization, and removal of invasive lines support patient recovery. Implementation of ERAS protocol in cardiac surgery faces challenges by some unique perioperative perspectives in cardiac surgery, such as systemic anticoagulation, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, significantly more hemodynamic variations, larger volume replacement, postoperative intubation and mechanical ventilation and associated sedation, and potentially significantly more co-existing morbidities than other surgical procedures. ERAS in cardiac surgery may benefit patients more related to its high risk and high cost nature. This manuscript specifically reviews the unique aspects of enhanced recovery in cardiac surgery.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardiovasculares , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Humanos
14.
J Med Econ ; 21(4): 390-397, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29295637

RESUMO

AIMS: To describe the utilization of clostridial collagenase ointment (CCO) and medicinal honey debridement methods in real-world inpatient and outpatient hospital settings among pressure ulcer (PU) patients and compare the frequency of healthcare re-encounters between CCO- and medicinal honey-treated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: De-identified hospital discharge records for patients receiving CCO or medicinal honey methods of debridement and having an ICD-9 code for PU were extracted from the US Premier Healthcare Database. Multivariable analysis was used to compare the frequency of inpatient and outpatient revisits up to 6 months after an index encounter for CCO- vs medicinal honey-treated PUs. RESULTS: The study identified 48,267 inpatients and 2,599 outpatients with PUs treated with CCO or medicinal honeys. Among study inpatients, n = 44,725 (93%) were treated with CCO, and n = 3,542 (7%) with medicinal honeys. CCO and medicinal honeys accounted for 1,826 (70%) and 773 (30%), respectively, of study outpatients. In adjusted models, those treated with CCO had lower odds for inpatient readmissions (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.80-0.94) after inpatient index visits, and outpatient re-encounters both after inpatient (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.67-0.79) and outpatient (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.64-0.95) index visits in 6 months of follow-up. LIMITATIONS: The study was observational in nature, and did not adjust for reasons why patients were hospitalized initially, or why they returned to the facility. Although the study adjusted for differences in a variety of demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics between the treatments, we are not able to rule out selection bias. CONCLUSION: Patients with CCO-treated PUs returned to inpatient and outpatient hospital settings less often compared with medicinal honey-treated PUs. These results from real-world administrative data help to gain a better understanding of the clinical characteristics of patients with PUs treated with these two debridement methods and the economic implications of debridement choice in the acute care setting.


Assuntos
Desbridamento/métodos , Mel , Pacientes Internados , Colagenase Microbiana/uso terapêutico , Úlcera por Pressão/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Administração Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Colagenase Microbiana/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pomadas/administração & dosagem , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Cicatrização , Adulto Jovem
15.
Am J Med Qual ; 33(4): 348-358, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29262690

RESUMO

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) are a societal burden and considered potentially preventable. Data on risk factors and HAPI burden are important for effective prevention initiatives. This study of the 2009-2014 US Premier Healthcare Database identified HAPI risk factors and compared outcomes after matching HAPI to non-HAPI patients. The cumulative incidence of HAPI was 0.28% (47 365 HAPI among 16 967 687 total adult inpatients). Among the matched sample of 110 808 patients (27 702 HAPI), the strongest risk factors for HAPI were prior PI (odds ratio [OR] = 12.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.93-13.15), prior diabetic foot ulcer (OR = 3.43, 95% CI = 3.20-3.68), and malnutrition (OR = 3.11, 95% CI = 3.02-3.20). HAPI patients had longer adjusted length of stay (3.7 days, P < .0001), higher total hospitalization cost ($8014, P < .0001), and greater odds of readmissions through 180 days (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.55-1.65). This study demonstrates how big data may help quantify HAPI burden and improve internal hospital processes by identifying high-risk patients and informing best practices for prevention.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Úlcera por Pressão/economia , Úlcera por Pressão/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Pé Diabético/epidemiologia , Feminino , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Desnutrição/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Grupos Raciais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos
18.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 20(3): 17, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26879875

RESUMO

Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a chronic neuropathic pain condition that persists 3 months or more following an outbreak of shingles. Shingles, also known as acute herpes zoster, is associated with the reactivation of the dormant varicella zoster virus in an individual who has experienced chicken pox. PHN is associated with persistent and often refractory neuropathic pain. Patients may experience multiple types of pain including a constant deep, aching, or burning pain; a paroxysmal, lancinating pain; hyperalgesia (painful stimuli are more painful than expected); and allodynia (pain associated with typically non-painful stimuli). The pharmacological treatment of PHN may include a variety of medications including alpha-2 delta ligands (gabapentin and pregabalin), other anticonvulsants (carbamazepine), tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, nortriptyline, doxepin), topical analgesics (5 % lidocaine patch, capsaicin) tramadol, or other opioids. The considerable side effect profiles of the commonly used oral medications often limit their practical use, and a combination of both topical and systemic agents may be required for optimal outcomes. Physicians and other treatment providers must tailor treatment based on the response of individual patients.


Assuntos
Aminas/uso terapêutico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Cicloexanocarboxílicos/uso terapêutico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/uso terapêutico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Gabapentina , Humanos , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/complicações , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/fisiopatologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 20(3): 16, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26879874

RESUMO

Perioperative management of patients receiving opioid addiction therapy presents a unique challenge for the anesthesiologist. The goal of pain management in this patient population is to effectively manage postoperative pain, to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes, and to reduce the cost of health care. Multimodal analgesics, including nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, intravenous acetaminophen, gabapentanoid agents, and low-dose ketamine infusions, have been used to improve postoperative pain and to reduce postoperative opioid use. Patients on long-term opioid management therapy with methadone and buprenorphine require special considerations. Recommendations and options for treating postoperative pain in patients on methadone and buprenorphine are outlined below. Other postoperative pain management options include patient-controlled analgesia, intravenous, and transdermal, in addition to neuraxial and regional anesthesia techniques. Special patient populations include the parturient on long-term opioid therapy. Recommendations for use of opioids in these patients during labor and delivery and in the postpartum period are discussed.


Assuntos
Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/prevenção & controle , Período Pós-Parto , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez
20.
J Med Econ ; 16(6): 720-35, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23452298

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide up-to-date estimates of the clinical and economic burden that occurs during inpatient treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia (FN). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 2007-2010 hospital discharge data from the Premier database. The study population included adult patients with discharge diagnoses of neutropenia (ICD-9 code 288.0x) with fever or infection and receipt of intravenous antibiotics and female breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), or Hodgkin lymphoma. Primary study outcomes were inpatient mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization cost for each patient's first FN-related hospitalization. Logistic regressions (for mortality) and multivariate linear regressions (for LOS and cost) were conducted to assess the effect of comorbidities and infection types on study outcomes, adjusting for other patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Among 16,273 cancer patients hospitalized with FN, the inpatient case fatality rate was 10.6%, mean LOS was 8.6 days, and mean total hospitalization cost was $18,880. Lung cancer patients had the highest inpatient case fatality rate (15.7%), and NHL patients had the longest LOS (10.1 days) and the highest cost ($24,218). Multivariate analyses showed that most comorbidities were associated with a greater risk of mortality, longer LOS, and higher cost. Septicemia/bacteremia and pneumonia were associated with a greater risk of mortality, and most types of infection were associated with a longer LOS and higher cost. LIMITATIONS: The total burden of FN may be under-estimated in this study because outpatient treatment and any patient deaths or costs that occurred outside of Premier hospitals could not be captured. CONCLUSIONS: FN-related hospitalizations among cancer patients are costly and accompanied by considerable mortality risk. Substantial differences in the clinical and economic burden of FN exist depending on cancer types, comorbidities, and infection types.


Assuntos
Neutropenia Febril/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Neoplasias/economia , Idoso , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...