A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis of Interteaching.

Interteaching is a behavioral teaching method that departs from the traditional lecture format (Boyce & Hineline in BA 25:215-226, 2002). We updated and expanded previous interteaching reviews and conducted a meta-analysis on its effectiveness. Systematic searches identified 38 relevant studies spanning the years 2005-2018. The majority of these studies were conducted in undergraduate face-to-face courses. The most common independent variables were manipulations of the configuration of interteaching or comparisons to traditional-lecture format. The most common dependent variables were quiz or examination scores. Only 24% of all studies implemented at least five of the seven components of interteaching. Prep guides, discussions, record sheets, and frequent assessments were the most commonly implemented. Meta-analyses indicated that interteaching is more effective than traditional lecture or other control conditions, with an overall large effect size. Furthermore, variations in the configuration of the interteaching components do not seem to substantially limit its effectiveness, as long as the discussion component is included. Future research informed by the present review includes: (a) investigating the efficacy of interteaching in additional academic areas, online environments, workplace training, and continuing education, (b) testing alternative outcome measures, generalization, and procedural integrity, (c) conducting systematic component analyses, and (d) measuring social validity from the instructor's perspective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10864-021-09452-3.

Interteaching: How much does each component increase its efficacy?

Although interteaching has been shown to improve students' understanding of course material in a multitude of classroom studies, only one laboratory study investigating it has been published. In that study, interteaching led to significantly higher scores on a quiz compared to other teaching methods. The goal of the present study was to add to the laboratory literature in this area by determining which components of interteaching are important for students' academic success. A pretest/posttest design was used in which participants were randomly assigned to experience 1 of 4 conditions: 1) reading; 2) reading plus prep guide; 3) reading, prep guide, plus group discussion; or 4) reading, prep guide, group discussion, plus clarifying lecture. The results demonstrated that condition 3 produced the highest improvement in test scores, implying that the group discussion was integral to producing positive academic outcomes.