The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without a latency period, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows.

The objectives of this study were to assess the effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without a latency period between tactile stimulation and the attachment of the milking unit, on the teat tissue condition and milking performance of dairy cows. In a randomized controlled crossover study, 145 Holstein cows milked 3 times daily were assigned to treatment (TRT) or control (CON) groups. Premilking udder preparation for the TRT group consisted of the application of a latency period resulting in a preparation lag time of 90 s. The only difference in the premilking udder preparation of the CON group was the absence of latency period; the milking unit was attached immediately after completion of the tactile stimulation. The average duration of total tactile stimulation in TRT and CON group was 8 ± 2 and 9 ± 2 s, respectively. The study lasted for 14 d and was split into 2 periods, each consisting of a 2-d adjustment period followed by 5 d of data collection. We assessed machine milking-induced short-term changes to the teat tissue by palpation and visual inspection postmilking. Electronic on-farm milk meters were used to assess milking characteristics (milk yield [kg/milking session], machine-on time [s], 2-min milk yield [kg], and duration of low milk flow rate [s]). Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze the effect of treatment on the outcome variables. The odds of machine milking-induced short-term changes to the teat tissue were lower for cows that received a 90-s preparation lag time (TRT cows) compared with cows in the CON group (odds ratio [95% confidence interval; 95% CI] = 0.13 [0.08-0.20]). The least squares means (95% CI) values of cows in the TRT and CON groups were 15.4 (14.9-15.9) and 15.3 (14.8-15.8) kg, respectively, for milk yield, and 246 (239-253) and 253 (247-260) s for machine-on time. The 2-min milk yield was higher for the TRT compared with CON group cows at all the parity levels. The 2-min milk yields of animals in lactation 1, 2, and ≥3 were 5.7, 5.7, and 6.5 kg, respectively, in the TRT group and 4.6, 5.0, and 5.9 kg in the CON group. The TRT cows spent less time in low milk flow rate compared with CON cows at all parity levels. The durations of low milk flow rate of cows in lactation 1, 2, and ≥3 in the TRT group were 19, 17 and 13 s, respectively, and those in the CON group were 31, 22, and 15 s. In this study, cows that received a latency period, and thus were subjected to a 90-s preparation lag time had lower odds of exhibiting short-term changes to the teat tissue after machine milking, shorter machine-on time, higher 2-min milk yields, and lower durations of low milk flow rates. We conclude that consideration of latency period leading to a 90-s preparation lag time in the premilking stimulation regimen facilitated cows' milk-ejection reflex. This latency period can alleviate the adverse effects of vacuum-induced forces on teat tissue during machine milking, improve udder health, and promote animal well-being.

A randomized controlled trial to study the effects of an automated premilking stimulation system on milking performance, teat tissue condition, and udder health in Holstein dairy cows.

The objectives were to examine the effect of an automated premilking stimulation (APS) by means of a high pulsation frequency (300 cycles/min) without a reduction of the vacuum in the pulsation chamber or claw piece on (1) milking performance, (2) teat tissue condition, and (3) udder health in dairy cows. In a randomized controlled field study, Holstein cows (n = 427) from 1 commercial dairy farm with a milking schedule of 3 times per day were assigned to treatment and control groups over a 90-d period. Treatments consisted of a maximum of 80 s (APS80) or 99 s (APS99) of mechanical stimulation at a pulsation rate of 300 pulses per minute and a ratio of 25:75 (no reduction of the pulsation chamber or milking vacuum). Cows in the control group (CON) received traditional premilking stimulation by means of manual forestripping for 8 s. Milking characteristics were documented with on-farm milk meters. Short- and long-term changes in teat tissue condition induced by machine milking were assessed visually on a weekly basis. Composite milk samples were analyzed once per month to determine somatic cell count. Generalized linear mixed models were used to study the effect of the treatment on the outcome variables. We observed no meaningful differences in milk yield or milking unit-on time. Least squares means and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for cows in the APS80, APS99, and CON groups were 13.5 (13.1-14.0), 13.2 (12.8-13.7), and 13.2 (12.8-13.7) kg for milk yield and 222 (213-231), 219 (210-228), and 223 (214-232) s for milking unit-on time, respectively. The effect of treatment on bimodality was modified by milk yield such that the odds of bimodality increased in the treatment groups with increasing milk yield. Compared with cows in the CON group, the odds ratios (95% CI) of bimodality were 1.08 (0.62-1.89) in the APS80 group and 0.89 (0.55-1.42) in the APS99 group at a milk yield of 11 kg and 2.0 (1.24-3.22) in the APS80 group and 2.08 (1.29-3.35) in the APS99 group at a milk yield of 16 kg. We observed differences in short- and long-term changes in teat tissue condition between the treatment and control groups. Compared with cows in the CON group, the odds (95% CI) of short-term changes were 1.87 (1.35-2.58) for the APS80 group and 1.49 (1.08-2.07) for the APS99 group, and the odds of long-term changes were 1.52 (1.24-1.85) for cows in the APS80 group and 1.59 (1.31-1.94) for cows in the APS99 group. The least squares means (95% CI) for somatic cell counts (log10-transformed) were 4.74 (4.68-4.81) for the APS80 group, 4.77 (4.71-4.83) for the APS99 group, and 4.79 (4.73-4.86) for the CON group. We conclude that the APS system tested here had no negative effects on milk yield or milking unit-on time. However, differences in bimodality and teat tissue condition suggest that the APS system did not provide sufficient stimulation to facilitate a gentle milk harvest and adversely affects teat tissue condition.

A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of intermittent and abrupt cessation of milking to end lactation on the well-being and intramammary infection risk of dairy cows.

The objectives were to compare the effects of an intermittent milking schedule with a thrice daily milking schedule during the final week of lactation on the well-being, udder health, milk production, and risk of culling of dairy cows. We hypothesized that cows subjected to an intermittent milking schedule would experience less udder engorgement and pain, lower concentrations of fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (11,17-dioxoandrostanes; 11,17-DOA concentration) after dry-off, lower risk of an intramammary infection during the dry period, higher milk production and lower somatic cell count in the subsequent lactation, and lower culling risk compared with herd mates milked 3 times daily and dried off by abrupt cessation. In a randomized controlled field study, Holstein cows (n = 398) with a thrice daily milking schedule were assigned to treatment and control groups. The treatment consisted of an intermittent milking schedule for 7 d before dry-off (gradual cessation of milking, GRAD). Gradual-cessation cows were milked once daily until the day of dry-off, whereas cows in the control group (abrupt cessation of milking, APT) were milked 3 times daily until the day of dry-off. Udder firmness and pain responses of the udder 3 d after dry-off, as well as the percentage change in fecal 11,17-DOA concentration (3 d after dry-off compared with the dry-off day), were used to assess the well-being of the animals. Compared with cows in the GRAD group, the odds [95% confidence interval (CI)] of udder firmness were 1.55 (0.99-2.42) for cows in the APT group, and the odds of a pain response were 1.48 (0.89-2.44) for cows in the APT group. The least squares means (95% CI) of the percentage change in 11,17-DOA concentration were 129.3% (111.1-150.4) for the APT group and 113.6% (97.5-132.4) for the GRAD group. Quarter-level culture results from the periods before dry-off and after calving were compared, to assess the likelihoods of microbiological cure and new infection. Cows in the APT group had lower odds of a new intramammary infection in the dry period [odds ratio, 95% CI: 0.63 (0.37-1.05)], whereas we observed no meaningful differences in the microbiological cure likelihood among groups. The least squares means (95% CI) for somatic cell counts (log10-transformed) were 4.9 (4.8-5.0) in the APT group and 4.9 (4.8-5.0) in the GRAD group. The odds (95% CI) of clinical mastitis in the first 30 d postcalving were 1.32 (0.53-3.30) in the APT group compared with the GRAD group. We observed no meaningful differences in milk production at the first test date postcalving or the culling risk among groups. We conclude that the gradual-cessation protocol tested herein failed to significantly improve animal well-being, udder health, milk production, and survival in the tested study cohort. However, the observed differences in udder firmness, as well as the numerical differences in udder pain and the percentage change in fecal 11,17-DOA concentrations suggest that this line of research may be useful. Future research is needed to develop drying-off strategies that are appropriate for lowering milk production at the end of the lactation and improve animal well-being without compromising udder health.

The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without manual forestripping, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows milked 3 times daily.

The objectives were to study the effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without manual forestripping, on teat tissue condition and milking characteristics in dairy cows. In a randomized controlled crossover study, 130 Holstein cows milked 3 times daily were assigned to treatment and control groups. Premilking udder preparation for the treatment group consisted of: (1) predipping with 1% iodine, (2) sequential forestripping of 3 streams of milk per quarter, (3) wiping of teats, and (4) attachment of the milking unit. Premilking udder preparation for the control group was identical except that the forestripping step was omitted. The mean tactile stimulation durations were 16 s and 7 s for the treatment and control group, respectively. The time spent from first tactile stimulus (either forestripping or wiping of teats) to milking unit attachment was kept consistent at 90 s for both groups. The study lasted for 14 d with 2 periods, each consisting of a 2-d adjustment time followed by 5 d of data collection. Machine milking-induced short-term changes to the teat tissue were assessed by palpation and visually. The following milking characteristics were assessed with electronic on-farm milk meters: milk yield (MY), milking unit-on time (MUOT), 2-min MY (2MIN), and time spent in low milk flow rate (LMF). Generalized linear mixed models were used to describe the effect of treatment on the outcome variables. The odds of machine milking-induced short-term changes to the teat tissue were lower for cows that received forestripping compared with cows that were not forestripped (odds ratio = 0.31; 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.42). Least squares means (95% confidence interval) for cows that were forestripped and animals that were not forestripped, respectively, were 12.7 (12.2-13.2) and 12.7 (12.2-13.2) kg for MY and 6.1 (5.8-6.4) and 5.6 (5.3-5.9) kg for 2MIN. There was an interaction between treatment and MY for LMF. Time spent in LMF for cows that were forestripped and received no forestripping, respectively, were 18 (17-20) and 24 (23-26) s for a MY level of 10 kg; and 13 (12-14) and 15 (14-16) s for a MY level of 15 kg. The effect of treatment on MUOT was modified by parity. Milking unit-on times for animals in first, second and third or greater lactation, respectively, were 230 (219-243), 249 (236-262), and 260 (249-272) s for cows that were forestripped, and 245 (232-258), 252 (239-266), and 268 (257-281) s for cows that received no forestripping. In this study, cows that were forestripped had shorter MUOT, higher 2MIN, lower LMF, and lower odds of exhibiting changes to the teat tissue after machine milking. We conclude that wiping of teats during premilking udder preparation alone and omitting forestripping of teats without compensating for the loss in stimulation time may not provide sufficient tactile stimulation to elicit the cows' maximum physiological milk-ejection capacity. This can aggravate the adverse effects of vacuum-induced forces on teat tissue during machine milking, diminish animal well-being, and possibly affect udder health.