RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of kidney disease, including hemodialysis, poses challenges in healthcare and finances. Despite limited data on hemodialysis costs and determinants in Ethiopia, existing literature indicates a paucity of evidence regarding the economic burden of hemodialysis. This study aims to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of hemodialysis among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, alongside associated factors, among selected governmental and private institutions in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. METHODS: An institutional-based cross-sectional study using a simple random sampling technique was conducted from September 10 to November 1, 2021. One hundred twenty-eight patients participated in the study. Data was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The analysis used proportion and frequency measures of central tendency and linear regression measures. Both simple and multiple linear regression models were used to assess associated factors. The final model used a P value < 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine significance. RESULT: The mean cost of hemodialysis in a representative sample of selected hospitals in Addis Ababa was 7,739.17 $ ±2,833.51 $, with direct medical cost contributing 72.9% of the total cost. Furthermore, the institution type (private or public) and duration on hemodialysis were associated with an increased cost of hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: Our findings underline the necessity for policymakers, program administrators, and healthcare institution executives to prioritize this group, recognizing the substantial load they bear and extending these services in government facilities to a broader patient population.
WHAT IS KNOWN?: Chronic kidney disease is the leading cause of sickness and death, affecting an estimated 10% of the population in 2015. Treatment of Kidney disease, including hemodialysis, presents not solely a medical concern but also a financial aspect. Therefore, we tried to assess the direct and indirect cost of hemodialysis among chronic kidney disease patients and associated factors among selected government and private institutions. WHAT DID WE DO?: The study's objective was to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease and examine the associated factors within selected government and private institutions. We selected the institutions after expert consultation due to their high patient flow. An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted, using an interviewer administered semi structured-questionnaire. WHAT DID WE FIND?: We found the mean cost of hemodialysis in a representative sample of selected hospitals in Addis Ababa to be 7,739.17$ ±2,833.51$, with direct medical cost contributing 72.9% of the total cost. Furthermore, the institution type (Private or Public) and number of years on hemodialysis were predictors of increased cost. Moreover, our findings have highlighted various strategies employed by patients facing challenges covering these expenses. Most patients resort to seeking assistance from family and friends, reducing the frequency of hemodialysis sessions, and cutting back on prescribed medications. It is important to note that several coping mechanisms can adversely affect patients' health, given that they involve skipping crucial life-saving treatments. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: We found out that the cost of hemodialysis was relatively high among the study participants. Therefore, policymakers, programmers, health institution leaders should pay closer attention to these patients as they face significant health and financial burdens.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sepsis and septic shock are the major causes of morbidity and mortality in Intensive care Units (ICUs) in low and middle-income countries. However, little is known about their prevalence and outcome in these settings. The study aimed to assess the prevalence and outcome of sepsis and septic shock in ICUs in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted from March 2017 to February 2018 in four selected ICUs in Addis Ababa from a total of twelve hospitals having ICU services. There were 1145 total ICU admissions during the study period. All admissions into those ICUs with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock using the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria (SEPSIS-2) during the study period were screened for sepsis or septic shock based on the new sepsis definition (SEPSIS-3). All patients with sepsis and septic shock during ICU admission were included and followed for 28 days of ICU admission. Data analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.0. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients were diagnosed with sepsis and septic shock. The overall prevalence of sepsis and septic shock was 26.5 per 100 ICU admissions. The most frequent source of sepsis was respiratory infection (53.1%). The median length of stay in the ICUs was 5 (IQR, 2-8) days. The most common bacterium isolate was Pseudomonas aeroginosa (34.5%). The ICU and 28-day mortality rate was 41.8% and 50.9% respectively. Male sex, modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≥10 on day 1 of ICU admission, and comorbidity of HIV or malignancy were the independent predictors of 28-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Sepsis and septic shock are common among our ICU admissions, and are associated with a high mortality rate.
