Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 103(5): 651-656, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28578098

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Authors have recently proposed the concept of "hip-spine syndrome", however there exists limited evidence available to differentiate whether these concomitant arthritides are due to anatomic/structural causes, or systemic/metabolic effects. Exploring this relationship has important implications during the evaluation and treatment of both spine and hip disorders-a common clinical presentation of many patients. The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the individual contribution of hip arthritis towards the development of spine arthritis, with knee arthritis also being analyzed as a negative (systemic) control. HYPOTHESIS: Hip and spine arthritis are caused by both metabolic and anatomic causes. METHODS: A large, well-organized osteological database was queried, and osteoarthritis of the spine, hip, and knee joints was quantified using a validated scoring criteria. Six hundred and twenty-five specimens were chosen for analysis. Multivariate linear regression models were created to quantify the independent contributions of age, gender, race, height, and arthritis of the spine and hip joints. RESULTS: Age was the strongest predictor of arthritis at each site (standardized betas>0.281, P<0.001 for all). Hip arthritis was a stronger predictor of spine arthritis than was knee arthritis (standardized betas 0.215 and 0.155, respectively, P<0.001 for both). Spine arthritis was also a stronger predictor of hip arthritis than was knee arthritis (standardized betas 0.232 and 0.173, P<0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic/structural influences about the lumbosacral-pelvic junction contribute towards the development of arthritis that is separate from any systemic/metabolic effects. Surgeons performing total hip arthroplasty should remain aware of these relationships, although future research is necessary regarding optimal surgical treatment of these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A (cadaveric study).


Assuntos
Região Lombossacral/patologia , Osteoartrite do Quadril/patologia , Osteoartrite da Coluna Vertebral/patologia , Articulação Sacroilíaca/patologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Estatura , Cadáver , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Quadril/etnologia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/etnologia , Osteoartrite da Coluna Vertebral/etnologia , Fatores Sexuais , Síndrome
2.
Bone Joint Res ; 5(9): 387-92, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27650107

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The spinopelvic relationship (including pelvic incidence) has been shown to influence pelvic orientation, but its potential association with femoroacetabular impingement has not been thoroughly explored. The purpose of this study was to prove the hypothesis that decreasing pelvic incidence is associated with increased risk of cam morphology. METHODS: Two matching cohorts were created from a collection of cadaveric specimens with known pelvic incidences: 50 subjects with the highest pelvic incidence (all subjects > 60°) and 50 subjects with the lowest pelvic incidence (all subjects < 35°). Femoral version, acetabular version, and alpha angles were directly measured from each specimen bilaterally. Cam morphology was defined as alpha angle > 55°. Differences between the two cohorts were analysed with a Student's t-test and the difference in incidence of cam morphology was assessed using a chi-squared test. The significance level for all tests was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Cam morphology was identified in 47/100 (47%) femurs in the cohort with pelvic incidence < 35° and in only 25/100 (25%) femurs in the cohort with pelvic incidence > 60° (p = 0.002). The mean alpha angle was also greater in the cohort with pelvic incidence < 35° (mean 53.7°, sd 10.7° versus mean 49.7°, sd 10.6°; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased pelvic incidence is associated with development of cam morphology. We propose a novel theory wherein subjects with decreased pelvic incidence compensate during gait (to maintain optimal sagittal balance) through anterior pelvic tilt, creating artificial anterior acetabular overcoverage and recurrent impingement that increases risk for cam morphology.Cite this article: W. Z. Morris, C. A. Fowers, R. T. Yuh, J. J. Gebhart, M. J. Salata, R. W. Liu. Decreasing pelvic incidence is associated with greater risk of cam morphology. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:387-392. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0028.R1.

3.
Bone Joint Res ; 5(2): 66-72, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26912384

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Sagittal alignment of the lumbosacral spine, and specifically pelvic incidence (PI), has been implicated in the development of spine pathology, but generally ignored with regards to diseases of the hip. We aimed to determine if increased PI is correlated with higher rates of hip osteoarthritis (HOA). The effect of PI on the development of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) was used as a negative control. METHODS: We studied 400 well-preserved cadaveric skeletons ranging from 50 to 79 years of age at death. Each specimen's OA of the hip and knee were graded using a previously described method. PI was measured from standardised lateral photographs of reconstructed pelvises. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between age and PI with HOA and KOA. RESULTS: The mean age was 60.2 years (standard deviation (sd) 8.1), and the mean PI was 46.7° (sd 10.7°). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between increased PI and HOA (standardised beta = 0.103, p = 0.017). There was no correlation between PI and KOA (standardised beta = 0.003, p = 0.912). CONCLUSION: Higher PI in the younger individual may contribute to the development of HOA in later life.Cite this article: Dr J. J. Gebhart. Relationship between pelvic incidence and osteoarthritis of the hip. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:66-72. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.52.2000552.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...