Expression of P40 and P63 in lung cancers using fine needle aspiration cases. Understanding clinical pitfalls and limitations.

BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of lung lesions is a highly accurate method for diagnosing and staging of lung cancers, particularly in patients with advanced cancer. Although, the majority of FNA cases of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) can be subclassified by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections, immunohistochemical (IHC) markers are usually necessary for difficult cases. Our previous study has shown that both P40 and P63 demonstrate differential sensitivity and specificity in the subclassification of squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) using tumor tissue microarrays (TMA). In the present study, we further evaluated the utility of P40 and P63 and the potential pitfalls and limitations associated with the usefulness of these stains in FNA cases. METHODS: By a computer search of pathology archives, 144 FNA biopsies with diagnoses of lung cancers and P40/P63 stains were identified, including 50 adenocarcinomas (ADCs), 56 SqCCs, 8 small cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs), and 12 cases of poorly differentiated carcinoma (PD CA). Ten benign FNA lung lesions and 8 other malignant neoplasms were also included as controls. Nuclear staining patterns of P40 and P63 were scored semi-quantitatively as 0 (negative), 1 (<10%, weak and focal), or 2 (>10%, strong and diffuse). RESULTS: In lung SqCCs, P40 and P63 were positive in 77.3% and 89.5% cases, respectively. In ADCs, P40 was weakly and focally positive in 6.1% cases, and P63 was variably positive in 62.8% cases. In SCLCs, P40 and P63 were focally positive in 12.5% and 50% cases. In PD CAs, no P40 or P63 immunoreactivity was detected. In the group of other neoplasms (n=8) both P40 and P63 were positive in the case of metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) (n=1), and P63 was positive in the case of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (n=1). The sensitivity and specificity of P40 and P63 were 76.9%/93.3%, and 90.2%/50.7% in the lung SqCC. CONCLUSIONS: P63 has a better sensitivity, and P40 has a better specificity for SqCC. A positive staining pattern with both markers was also found in certain non-SqCC cases. Recognizing limitations of these markers are particularly important in FNA cases.

Utility of a novel triple marker (combination of thyroid transcription factor 1, Napsin A, and P40) in the subclassification of non-small cell lung carcinomas using fine-needle aspiration cases.

Personalized treatment of lung cancer requires an accurate subclassification of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) into adenocarcinoma (ADC), squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), and other subtypes. In poorly differentiated tumors especially on small fine-needle aspirate specimens, the subclassification could be difficult in certain cases. Our previous study using resected tumor tissue has shown that the combination of commonly used individual markers (thyroid transcription factor 1 [TTF-1], P40, and Napsin A) into a novel triple marker has high sensitivity and specificity in subclassification of NSCLC and also the advantage of using minimal tumor tissue. In this study, we further evaluated the utility of this novel triple marker using fine-needle aspirate cases. We included primary NSCLC, consisting of 37 SqCCs (primary, 35; metastasis, 2) and 50 ADCs (primary, 29; metastasis, 21), 12 metastatic ADCs of nonpulmonary primary, and 10 small cell lung carcinomas. The immunohistochemical patterns were semiquantitatively scored. In lung SqCCs and ADCs, the sensitivity and specificity of the triple marker were 100% and 97.1% and 86.0% and 100%, respectively. The triple marker showed no immunoreactivity in 12 metastatic nonpulmonary ADCs. In 10 small cell lung carcinomas, TTF-1 had focal positivity in 40% of cases. The limitations of the triple marker include staining of alveolar macrophages (by TTF-1 and Napsin A), basal layer of bronchial epithelial cells (by P40), and nonspecific cytoplasmic staining of TTF-1. Our study not only supports our previous finding using resected tumor specimens but also provides evidence that the triple marker can be used for cytological material and preserving tumor tissue for molecular testing.

Detection of PIK3CA mutations, including a novel mutation of V344G in exon 4, in metastatic lung adenocarcinomas: A retrospective study of 115 FNA cases.

BACKGROUND: Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations and amplification are detected in 1% of primary lung adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and in 38% of primary lung squamous cell carcinomas. Alterations of PIK3CA in metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), however, are still not fully understood. This study investigated PIK3CA alterations in metastatic ADCs and correlated the findings with those for other commonly tested molecular abnormalities via fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and small-core biopsy materials. METHODS: This study identified 115 FNA cases of metastatic lung ADC with standard lung cancer panel analysis by targeted next-generation sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institute over a 12-month period. The panel included mutational analysis of PIK3CA, AKT, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, and NRAS genes and tests of rearrangements for ALK and ROS1 genes. RESULTS: A PIK3CA mutation was detected in 7 of 115 cases of metastatic ADC (6.1%). The majority of the mutations were located in exon 9 or exon 20; however, a mutation in exon 1 was seen in 1 case. Furthermore, p.V344G in exon 4 was detected in 2 cases. Among cases with PIK3CA mutations, 4 had coexisting EGFR mutations, whereas 2 had a coexisting BRAF or KRAS mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Several common mutations as well as a novel mutation in the PIK3CA gene were observed in metastatic NSCLC (particularly ADC). The unique role, however, of PIK3CA mutations in metastatic NSCLC and the clinical implications need to be further investigated. Cancer Cytopathol 2016;124:485-92. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Utility of five commonly used immunohistochemical markers TTF-1, Napsin A, CK7, CK5/6 and P63 in primary and metastatic adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a retrospective study of 246 fine needle aspiration cases.

BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy plays a critical role in the diagnosis and staging of lung primary and metastatic lung carcinoma. Accurate subclassification of adenocarcinoma (ADC) and/or squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) is crucial for the targeted therapy. However, the distinction between ADC and SqCC may be difficult in small FNA specimens. Here, we have retrospectively evaluated the utility of TTF-1, Napsin A, CK7, P63 and CK5/6 immunohistochemical (IHC) markers in the distinguishing and subclassification of ADC and SqCC. METHODS: A total of 246 FNA cases were identified by a computer search over a two-year period, including 102 primary NSCLC and 144 primary NSCLC which had metastasized to other sites. The immunostaining patterns of TTF-1, Napsin A, CK7, P63 and CK5/6 were correlated with the histological diagnosis of the tumor. RESULTS: In 72 primary ADCs, TTF-1, Napsin A and CK7 showed a sensitivity and specificity of 84.5%/96.4%, 92.0%/100%, and 93.8%/50.0%. In 30 primary SqCCs, CK5/6 and P63 showed a sensitivity and specificity of 100%/77.8% and 91.7%/78.3%. In 131 metastatic ADCs, Napsin A showed the highest specificity (100%), versus TTF-1 (87.5%) and CK7 (25%) but decreased sensitivity (67.8% versus 86.9% and 100%); whereas in 13 metastatic SqCCs, CK5/6 and P63 showed a sensitivity/specificity of 100%/84.6% and 100%/68.4%. Bootstrap analysis showed that the combination of TTF-1/CK7, TTF-1/Napsin A and TTF-1/CK7/Napsin A had a sensitivity/specificity of 0.960/0.732, 0.858/0.934, 0.972/0.733 for primary lung ADCs and 0.992/0.642, 0.878/0.881, 0.993/0.618 for metastatic lung ADCs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that IHC markers had variable sensitivity and specificity in the subclassification of primary and metastatic ADC and SqCC. Based on morphological findings, an algorithm with the combination use of markers aided in the subclassification of NSCLCs in difficult cases.

Expression of transcript factors SALL4 and OCT4 in a subset of non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND: SALL4 and OCT4 are transcription factors and play essential roles in stem cell development and oncogenesis. However, the expression of these transcription factors has not been well studied in lung cancers. In this study, we evaluated the expression of SALL4 and OCT4 in non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) by immunochemistry. NSCLC tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed with a total of 77 primary lung adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and 90 primary lung squamous cell carcinomas (SqCCs). A mouse monoclonal anti-human SALL4 (1:400 dilution) and a polyclonal anti-human OCT4 (1:200 dilution) antibodies were used. Nuclear staining of SALL4 and OCT4 was scored semi-quantitatively using a three tiered scale. The expressions of SALL4 and OCT4 were correlated with the tumor differentiation, pathological stage, and patients' clinical information. RESULTS: In primary ADCs, the stronger expression of SALL4 and OCT4 was 7.8% and 9.1%, respectively. The stronger expression of SALL4 was inversely correlated with tumor differentiations. In primary SqCCs, the stronger expressions of SALL4 and OCT4 were 16.7% and 0%, respectively. The expression of SALL4 is correlated with the expression of OCT4, but inversely correlated with the tumor stage in SqCCs. CONCLUSIONS: We found that both SALL4 and OCT4 were differentially expressed in a subset of primary ADC and SqCC. Our finding suggest that different stem cell markers may be expressed and/or play differential role in different subtypes of NSCLC. The potential role of SALL4 and OCT4 needs to be further investigated in NSCLC.

Endorectal ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: a useful diagnostic tool for perirectal and intraluminal lesions.

OBJECTIVES: Endorectal endoscopic ultrasound (ERUS) allows highly detailed assessment of the rectal wall layers and visualization of the extraluminal structures. Herein, we study the utility of ERUS fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to evaluate perirectal lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-nine ERUS-FNAs were retrieved from the cytopathology archives of The Johns Hopkins Hospital. The cytology slides, corresponding histology, immunohistochemistry when available, and clinical data were reviewed. RESULTS: The aspirated material showed malignant (n = 24), benign (n = 19), atypical (n = 3), carcinoid tumor (n = 1), and nondiagnostic conditions (n = 2). The past medical history of 36 cases was significant for carcinomas. The primary site of the tumors included colorectal, urinary bladder, prostate, pancreas, gallbladder, ovary, and female lower genital tract. Statistical analysis for endoscopic ultrasonography FNA showed 87% sensitivity, 100% specificity, diagnostic accuracy of 90%, and a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 77%. CONCLUSION: ERUS-FNA can be utilized for: (1) accurate staging of colorectal adenocarcinomas by evaluation of nodal metastasis, depth of transmural tumor invasion and local tumor spread to perirectal fat, (2) prevention of aggressive surgical intervention in benign conditions, (3) providing diagnostic material for ancillary studies, and (4) evaluation of perirectal lesions with a more accurate method by combining imaging and histology.

The PapSpin: a reasonable alternative to other, more expensive liquid-based Papanicolaou tests.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to optimize a liquid-based Papanicolaou (Pap) test by using common cytopathology laboratory equipment and resulted in an inexpensive test that was equivalent at least diagnostically to the conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smear. METHODS: Adult women (n = 482) were consented, enrolled, and included in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. After conventional Pap smear slides were obtained, clinicians placed the collection device with residual cells from the uterine cervix in a preservative fluid. In the cytopathology laboratory, a conventional centrifuge device was used to deposit the cells from the liquid onto a glass slide. RESULTS: Among the conventional Pap smears, 43 were categorized as low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and 30 were categorized as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or greater (HSIL+). Among the PapSpin samples, 49 were categorized as LSIL and 24 were categorized as HSIL+. Biopsy confirmation was obtained in 124 patients. There were 23 women diagnosed with LSIL and 27 women diagnosed with HSIL+. Diagnostic agreement between cytologic samples and biopsies is as follows: for conventional Pap smears, there was agreement on 11 of 23 LSIL diagnoses and on 15 of 27 HSIL+ diagnoses; for PapSpin samples, there was agreement on 11 of 23 LSIL diagnoses and on 14 of 27 HSIL+ diagnoses. Exact agreement was achieved between PapSpin and conventional smears in 404 patients (84%). Quality indictors were better in the PapSpin group, except for inadequate endocervical component, which was greater in the PapSpin samples, a difference that was explained by the split-sample study design, which favored the conventional smear. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that PapSpin is a legitimate, inexpensive alternative to the conventional Pap smear for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, resulting in better preservation and improved cell visualization. In addition, the liquid residual allows for reflex human papillomavirus-DNA or polymerase chain reaction testing.