How soon they forget: changes to beliefs after learning about tobacco.

University students' beliefs about tobacco and nicotine were assessed before an educational intervention aimed at correcting tobacco-related misinformation. Beliefs were again measured immediately after the intervention, and then again after a 2-, 4-, 6-, or 8-week retention interval. Initially, participants showed significantly more accurate beliefs about tobacco than pre-intervention, but this improvement decreased after the retention interval. Results suggest that methods currently used in an attempt to alleviate tobacco misinformation in the public may be effective for short-term, but not long-term retention. The current study accents the need to design tobacco programs that optimize retention of belief change so that people may use that knowledge confidently in future health-related decisions.

Exploring metacognitive accuracy in visual search.

For decades, researchers have examined visual search. Much of this work has focused on the factors (e.g., movement, set size, luminance, distractor features and proximity) that influence search speed. However, no research has explored whether people are aware of the influence of these factors. For instance, increases in set size will typically slow down target detection; yet no research has measured participants' metacognitive awareness of this phenomenon. The present research explores this area by integrating a visual search task with a metacognitive monitoring paradigm. All of the explored factors influenced search latency. However, all of the factors except target presence influenced ratings. Saliency and suppression are discussed as two possible explanations for the results. Future directions for extending the theory and the practical benefits of this research are also outlined.

Perception of initial moving target signals: support for a cumulative lateral inhibition theory.

The cumulative lateral inhibition (CLI) theory of the Fröhlich effect (perceptual mislocalization of the starting position of a moving target in the direction of movement) proposes that the target is difficult to see early in its trajectory because inhibitory feedback from later target views weakens initial target representations. In contrast, attention shift explanations contend that a phenomenal representation of the target is unavailable until attention has shifted to the vicinity of the target. Experiments 1-3 demonstrated that instructing naive undergraduate participants to accept different degrees of target clarity before making their response can alter the magnitude (and presence) of the Fröhlich effect. Experiments 2-4 showed that increasing movement distance by adding target presentations reduced the visibility of the target at early positions. These results are difficult to reconcile with an attention shift account.