[A man with dyspnoea after a kidney transplant]. / Een man met kortademigheid na niertransplantatie.

We present a 62-year-old man with a kidney transplant in the past. Because of progressive dyspnoea a CT-scan was made, which showed ground glass in the upper fields with calcifications. He was diagnosed with metastatic pulmonary calcification, which is mostly seen in patient with renal failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Comparative Survival among Older Adults with Advanced Kidney Disease Managed Conservatively Versus with Dialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Outcomes of older patients with ESRD undergoing RRT or conservative management (CM) are uncertain. Adequate survival data, specifically of older patients, are needed for proper counseling. We compared survival of older renal patients choosing either CM or RRT. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A retrospective survival analysis was performed of a single-center cohort in a nonacademic teaching hospital in The Netherlands from 2004 to 2014. Patients with ESRD ages ≥70 years old at the time that they opted for CM or RRT were included. Patients with acute on chronic renal failure needing immediate start of dialysis were excluded. RESULTS: In total, 107 patients chose CM, and 204 chose RRT. Patients choosing CM were older (mean±SD: 83±4.5 versus 76±4.4 years; P<0.001). The Davies comorbidity scores did not differ significantly between both groups. Median survival of those choosing RRT was higher than those choosing CM from time of modality choice (median; 75th to 25th percentiles: 3.1, 1.5-6.9 versus 1.5, 0.7-3.0 years; log-rank test: P<0.001) and all other starting points (P<0.001 in all patients). However, the survival advantage of patients choosing RRT was no longer observed in patients ages ≥80 years old (median; 75th to 25th percentiles: 2.1, 1.5-3.4 versus 1.4, 0.7-3.0 years; log-rank test: P=0.08). The survival advantage was also substantially reduced in patients ages ≥70 years old with Davies comorbidity scores of ≥3, particularly with cardiovascular comorbidity, although the RRT group maintained its survival advantage at the 5% significance level (median; 75th to 25th percentiles: 1.8, 0.7-4.1 versus 1.0, 0.6-1.4 years; log-rank test: P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center observational study, there was no statistically significant survival advantage among patients ages ≥80 years old choosing RRT over CM. Comorbidity was associated with a lower survival advantage. This provides important information for decision making in older patients with ESRD. CM could be a reasonable alternative to RRT in selected patients.

Binary ultrasonography for the internist: yes or no, that's the question!

The authors discuss the pros and cons with regard to ultrasound for the internist. They state that ultrasonography is seldom used by internists and they suggest several reasons for this. After a brief review of the literature they conclude that using ultrasound would probably benefit patients and would lead to a more rapid diagnosis and an increase in safety while performing invasive diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The authors suggest that internists use ultrasound in a different way compared with radiologists, cardiologists, etc. They introduce the term binary ultrasound: ultrasound should be used to answer clinical questions with a yes or a no.

Extremely high serum ferritin levels as diagnostic tool in adult-onset Still's disease.

The diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease (ASD) is difficult to establish due to the nonspecific clinical and laboratory findings. A markedly raised serum ferritin level is a typical finding, although it is not well understood why ferritin levels are extremely high in ASD. We discuss several possible explanations leading to the extremely high levels of ferritin.

Catheter replacement in continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration: the balance between infectious and mechanical complications.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the optimal moment of central vascular catheter replacement balancing infectious and mechanical complications in continuous renal replacement therapies in critically ill patients with acute renal failure. METHODS: Prospective sequential trial with historical controls to compare liberal catheter replacement when clinically indicated with routine catheter replacement every 5 days in consecutive patients treated by continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration in a level I secondary referral intensive care unit of a university-affiliated teaching hospital. Intention-to-treat analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent catheter replacement when clinically indicated (group II), and 21 patients served as historical controls (group I). The groups were comparable for sex, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, comorbidity, and creatinin and urea levels at the start of continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration. In group I, 71 catheters were used for 346 treatment days, and in group II, 68 catheters were used for 495 treatment days. The mean duration of catheterization was 4.9 +/- 2.0 days vs. 7.3 +/- 4.5 days, respectively (Student's t-test p <.001). There was no significant difference between the incidence of colonization of catheters (46.8% in group I vs. 39.1% in group II; chi-square p =.35) In group I, bacteremia and catheter sepsis occurred in two patients, whereas this did not occur in group II. The occurrence of mechanical complications was comparable in both groups (15.5% in group I vs. 19.1% in group II). There were significantly more mechanical complications with arterial vs. venous catheters (17 vs. 7; chi-square p =.027). CONCLUSION: When catheters were changed as clinically indicated, they remained significantly longer in situ vs. being replaced routinely every 5 days; infectious and mechanical complications were comparable. The incidence of catheter sepsis was low (2.2%), and no prosthesis infection occurred. Catheter replacement when clinically indicated seems to be as safe as routine replacement every 5 days.