Urologic complications in more than 2500 kidney transplantations performed at the Saint Barnabas healthcare system.

We report our urologic complications based on one urologist's experience during a 17-year period on more than 2500 ureteral reimplantation operations performed at the time of kidney transplant. Among 2548 ureteroneocystostomies performed by the transplant urologist, a 5.5% urologic complication rate was observed. This included vesicoureteral reflux (3%), ureteral strictures (1.3%), urine leak (0.9%), and uteropelvic junction obstruction (0.3%). The factors for low urologic complication rates include the use of a shorter segment of ureter using the Lich-Gregoir technique (compared to the Politano-Leadbetter technique) and the routine use of indwelling stents. In addition, having one transplant urologist performing all ureteral reimplantations and managing all urologic complications provided consistency in results.

Transporting live donor kidneys for kidney paired donation: initial national results.

Optimizing the possibilities for kidney-paired donation (KPD) requires the participation of donor-recipient pairs from wide geographic regions. Initially it was envisaged that donors would travel to the recipient center; however, to minimize barriers to participation and simplify logistics, recent trends have involved transporting the kidneys rather than the donors. The goal of this study was to review outcomes of this practice. KPD programs throughout the United States were directly queried about all transplants involving live donor kidney transport. Early graft function was assessed by urine output in the first 8 h, postoperative serum creatinine trend, and incidence of delayed graft function. Between April 27, 2007 and April 29, 2010, 56 live donor kidneys were transported among 30 transplant centers. Median CIT was 7.2 h (IQR 5.5-9.7, range 2.5-14.5). Early urine output was robust (>100 cc/h) in all but four patients. Creatinine nadir was <2.0 mg/dL in all (including the four with lower urine output) but one patient, occurring at a median of 3 days (IQR 2-5, range 1-49). No patients experienced delayed graft function as defined by the need for dialysis in the first week. Current evidence suggests that live donor kidney transport is safe and feasible.

Urologic complications in over 1000 kidney transplants performed at the Saint Barnabas healthcare system.

We report the complication rate based on one urologist's experience over a 9-year period including over 1000 ureteral reimplants performed at the time of kidney transplantation. Among 1083 ureteral reimplant operations, there was a 4.3% urologic complication rate, including a 2.7% ureteral stricture rate and a less than 1% rate each of urine leak ureteropelvic junction obstruction, vesicoureteral reflux and clot obstruction. The factors that lead to a low urologic complication rate are believed to be the use of short ureteral segment using the Lich (compared to the Politano-Leadbetter) technique and the routine use of indwelling stents. In addition, a consistency in results was attributed to one transplant urologist performing all ureteral reimplants and managing all urologic complications.

Hypercoagulable states in renal transplant candidates: impact of anticoagulation upon incidence of renal allograft thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: Although multiple studies of demographic variables have been associated with allograft thrombosis, these results are not routinely reproducible. Are ESRD patients with hypercoagulable states (HCS) (antithrombin III deficiency, protein S or C deficiency, activated protein C resistance, and anticardiolipin antibodies) at predictably greater risk for allograft thrombosis? METHODS: Between 1996 and 1999, all renal transplant candidates were screened for hypercoagulability risk factors [HRF] (multiple arteriovenous access thromboses, prior deep vein thrombosis, prior allograft thrombosis, collagen vascular disease, multiple miscarriages, diabetes, autoimmune disease, and Fabry's disease). HRF(+) candidates were then tested for HCS status. We administered preemptive posttransplant i.v. Heparin in HCS(+) patients and observed the impact of this intervention upon the incidence of allograft thrombosis. We compared demographic data and incidence of allograft thrombosis in an historic control (346 patients transplanted between June 31, 1992, and March 5, 1996) not tested for HCS and a study cohort (502 patients transplanted between March 6, 1996, and June 31, 1999) prospectively screened for HRF. HRF(+) patients who were HCS(+) in the study cohort received i.v. heparin immediately after transplant and p.o. warfarin as outpatients. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics previously implicated in allograft thrombosis were equivalently distributed in both cohorts with the exceptions that more living-donor transplants (33.1% vs. 15.3%) were performed in study cohort, CIT>24 hr occurred in more control patients (37.3% vs. 22.1%) and more study patients (16.7% vs. 0%) received tacrolimus. Hypercoagulable states were found upon reevaluating five of seven controls (71.4%), who lost prior allografts to thrombosis. Hypercoagulable states were prospectively detected in 10 study patients with hypercoagulability risk factors. Most (9 of 10) study patients receiving anticoagulation have achieved long-term allograft function. Study group allograft thrombosis incidence was reduced (1.59% vs. 4.05%). Hypercoagulable states were demonstrated in most episodes of allograft thrombosis. Control patients who lost prior allografts to thrombosis were anticoagulated after retransplantation and 100% achieved long-term allograft function. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term allograft function has been achieved in 90% of study patients when prophylactically anticoagulating study patients with hypercoagulable states. A 2.6-fold reduction in the expected incidence of allograft thrombosis was observed in anticoagulated patients with hypercoagulable states.

Nephrogenic adenomas occurring in a patient with simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant.

We present a female patient who developed multiple nephrogenic adenomas of the bladder about 3 years after a simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant. The patient was initially treated with endoscopic resection but, due to recurrences, she later underwent a conversion of pancreatic drainage from the bladder to the small bowel and has since done well. We believe this to be the first such case reported in the literature.

Evaluation of voiding cystourethrography prior to renal transplantation.

In many centers, voiding cystourethrography is a routine part of pretransplantation assessment of the lower urinary tract. To assess the value of this investigation, a retrospective review of transplant candidates evaluated in our center over 2 years was undertaken. A total of 517 patients were fully evaluable. Only 13 voiding cystourethrograms (VCUGs) (2.5%) of 517 were found to be abnormal. Three patients with reflux alone did not require intervention before transplantation. Four patients with decreased bladder capacity underwent hydrodistention. Two patients increased their capacity to over 150 ml and two patients failed distention, one requiring an ileal conduit and the other requiring an augmentation cystoplasty. Three patients had increased postvoid residual (PVR). Two patients started clean intermittent catheterization. One required prostate resection for benign prostatic hypertrophy. One patient with reflux and decreased bladder capacity refused treatment. One patient with reflux combined with increased PVR started clean intermittent catheterization and was cleared for transplant surgery. One patient with decreased bladder capacity and increased PVR had a stroke and was excluded from transplantation. All 13 patients with abnormal VCUGs had a prior urologic history. In total, only 56 of 517 patients evaluated had a prior urological history. Each VCUG costs approximately $500. Limiting VCUG studies to those patients with a prior urological history would have resulted in a significant cost savings. Hence, we recommend that only patients with a prior urological history should undergo this costly and often distressing examination.

Preliminary experience with split liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of split liver transplantation is to alleviate the organ shortage for patients with end-stage liver disease. The procedure, however, has not gained wide acceptance. This is related not only to the complexity of the procedure but also to poorer results and the complications reported to be associated with the technique. STUDY DESIGN: We report 12 split liver transplantation procedures, seven in children and five in adults. Selection criteria were the same as those for whole-size liver transplantation. Patient and graft survival as well as complications were analyzed. Results were analyzed by Wilcoxon life tables. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival rates are 91.6 and 75 percent, respectively. One patient died at 2.5 months after transplantation because of lymphoproliferative disease. Another had acute vanishing bile duct syndrome and required retransplantation at 1.5 months. One patient had retransplantation because of hepatic artery thrombosis. Bile leaks occurred in two patients and hemothorax in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that split liver transplantation has become a more acceptable method of hepatic transplantation and should be encouraged. Several guidelines can enhance success rates.

Pretransplant status and patient survival following liver transplantation.

The current liver allocation system has been criticized, since available organs go to those who are the most critically ill. These recipients have the poorest overall survival. Identification of pretransplant risk factors for mortality would allow better allocation of donor livers. This study was a retrospective analysis of pretransplant clinical and laboratory parameters and subsequent postoperative liver transplant mortality to identify high-risk subgroups. Of 347 consecutive consecutive primary liver transplant recipients, 59 (17%) met United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) criteria for status 4. Pretransplant factors included liver function, coagulation, albumin and ammonia levels, renal function, the presence of ascites, and etiology of liver disease. Overall 1-year patient survival was significantly worse for the status 4 recipients (89.0% vs. 67.7%; P = 0.01). In a univariate analysis of pretransplant risk factors for all recipients, elevated creatinine (P = 0.008) and ammonia (P = 0.009), and UNOS status 4 (P = 0.01) significantly affected postoperative survival. In multivariate analysis of pretransplant risk factors for all recipients, elevated creatinine (P = 0.003) was the only factor to significantly affect postoperative survival. In UNOS status 4 patients, univariate analysis of pretransplant risk factors and their influence on patient survival demonstrated that prolonged coagulation partial thromboplastin time (P = 0.04) and a higher grade of encephalopathy (P = 0.02) significantly affected postoperative survival. Advanced encephalopathy (P = 0.009) and prolonged partial thromboplastin time (P = 0.01) were the only significant risk factors by multivariate analysis in status 4 patients. In status 4 and non-status 4 patients, we identified risk factors that adversely affected patient survival, but their predictive power was insufficient to deny transplantation. Despite the higher mortality in status 4 recipients, their long-term survival is only slightly worse than that of non-status 4 patients. Until better predictors of survival are ascertained, our data do not support limiting the use of donor livers in UNOS status 4 recipients.

Pancreas transplantation.

During the past decade, marked improvement has been made in the field of pancreas transplantation. The best results have been obtained in patients receiving a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant using the bladder drainage technique. An overall improvement in the secondary complications of diabetes has been documented in patients receiving successful pancreatic grafts. Pancreatic islet cell transplantation remains largely experimental at this time.

Living-unrelated renal donor transplantation: the UNOS experience, 1987-1991. United Network for Organ Sharing.

1. LURD transplants were associated with excellent one-year graft survival of 92%. This survival was superior to that for cadaver transplants performed during the same period. 2. High-risk groups for LURDs are children (age < 18 years) and repeat transplant recipients. Both groups were associated with significantly decreased graft survival. 3. The effects of HLA matching and donor-specific transfusions are not significant. 4. Because of the critical shortage of donor organs and the increasing waiting time for renal transplantation, the use of LURDs can be recommended as a means to expand the number of available organs.