Dyspepsia tolerability from the patients' perspective: a comparison of celecoxib with diclofenac.

AIM: To compare celecoxib (800 mg/day, n=1997) with diclofenac (150 mg/day, n=1996) on dyspepsia-related tolerability. METHODS: In one of the two protocols comprising the Celecoxib Long-Term Arthritis Safety Study, a randomized double-blind trial, patients completed the Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment Questionnaire at baseline and at weeks 4, 13, 26 and 52 for the following three scales: Pain Intensity, Non-Pain Symptoms and Satisfaction with Dyspepsia-Related Health. RESULTS: For the Pain Intensity scale, patients given diclofenac had significantly higher (worsening dyspepsia) mean changes, defined as follow-up minus baseline, than patients given celecoxib (P < 0.001, at all assessments). The mean changes in the Pain Intensity scale (scale, 2-47; higher score is higher pain intensity) were 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50, 1.48) for celecoxib and 2.76 (95% CI: 2.28, 3.25) for diclofenac at 4 weeks. Satisfaction was superior with celecoxib at all assessments (P < 0.001). At 4 weeks, the mean changes in the Satisfaction scale (scale, 7-35; higher score is higher satisfaction) were 0.02 (95% CI: - 0.26, 0.29) for celecoxib and - 0.72 (95% CI: - 1.00, - 0.45) for diclofenac. Diclofenac patients had significantly higher Non-Pain Symptoms at 4 weeks (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib, at two to four times the recommended dose, demonstrated a superior dyspepsia-related tolerability and satisfaction compared with standard dosages of diclofenac.

Upper gastrointestinal tolerability of celecoxib compared with diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tolerability of celecoxib (a cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitor) and diclofenac using data from three randomised, double-blind clinical trials in osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients in two OA studies received either celecoxib 100 mg BID (n = 545), diclofenac 50 mg BID or TID (n = 540), or placebo (n = 200) for 6 weeks. In the RA study, patients received celecoxib 200 mg BID (n = 326) or diclofenac 75 mg BID (n = 329) for 24 weeks. The cumulative incidence of abdominal pain, dyspepsia, nausea or any of these events (UGI tolerability composite endpoint) after the first 6 weeks was estimated using time-to-event analysis. RESULTS: In the pooled OA trials, the cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly higher with diclofenac (17.6%; 95% CI: 14.4-20.9%) than celecoxib (11.1%; 95% CI: 8.4-13.8%; p = 0.002) and comparable with placebo (13.3%; 95% CI: 8.1-18.4%; p = 0.157). In the PA trial, the cumulative incidence of the UGI tolerability composite endpoint was also significantly higher with diclofenac (20.7%; 95% CI: 16.3-25.1%) than celecoxib (15.9%; 95% CI: 11.9-20.0%; p = 0.013). Celecoxib was also better tolerated than diclofenac in this trial in terms of the cumulative incidences of abdominal pain (p = 0.031) and dyspepsia (p = 0.062). The results of the UGI tolerability composite endpoint analysis were confirmed using the Cox proportional hazards model to controlfor other predictors of UGI adverse events. CONCLUSION: The UGI tolerability of therapeutic dosages of celecoxib was significantly better than diclofenac in patients with RA or OA.

Comparison of once-daily and twice-daily administration of celecoxib for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a celecoxib 200 mg QD regimen with a 100 mg BID regimen in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. METHODS: Patients enrolled in this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib 100 mg BID, celecoxib 200 mg QD, or placebo for 6 weeks. Assessments of OA severity (Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments of Arthritis, Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale, Lequesne Osteoarthritis Severity Index, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) were performed at baseline and at week 2 and/or 6. Patients who discontinued treatment underwent assessments at the time of withdrawal from the study. RESULTS: Of the 718 patients enrolled, 243 received celecoxib 100 mg BID, 231 received celecoxib 200 mg QD, and 244 received placebo. For all measures of efficacy, at all assessments, improvements from baseline in both celecoxib groups were superior to that seen in the placebo group (P < 0.05). No significant differences in efficacy between the celecoxib groups were observed. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in the 2 celecoxib treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dosing regimens of celecoxib 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID are equally effective and well tolerated in patients with OA of the knee. The availability of 2 effective regimens provides patients and physicians with increased flexibility in the selection of an appropriate dosing regimen for celecoxib therapy.

Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib versus hydrocodone/acetaminophen in the treatment of pain after ambulatory orthopedic surgery in adults.

BACKGROUND: Current outpatient management of postoperative pain includes the use of oral opioid analgesics or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; however, both types of medications are associated with side effects that can limit their usefulness in the outpatient setting. OBJECTIVE: Two studies with identical protocols assessed the single- and multiple-dose analgesic efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib, a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in the treatment of acute pain after orthopedic surgery. METHODS: These were multicenter, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trials conducted between January and June 1998. Both consisted of a single-dose assessment period (SDAP) and a multiple-dose assessment period (MDAP). In the SDAP, patients who had undergone orthopedic surgery received a single oral dose of celecoxib 200 mg, hydrocodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 1000 mg, or placebo within 24 hours after the end of anesthesia, with pain assessments conducted over the following 8-hour period. In the MDAP, extending from 8 hours after the first dose of study medication up to 5 days, patients who had received < or =1 dose of rescue medication during the SDAP continued on study medication (placebo recipients were rerandomized to active treatment), which could be taken up to 3 times a day as needed. RESULTS: A total of 418 patients were enrolled in the 2 trials. During the SDAP, 141 patients received celecoxib, 136 received hydrocodone/acetaminophen, and 141 received placebo. During the MDAP, 185 patients received celecoxib and 181 received hydrocodone/acetaminophen. When the combined data were analyzed, mean pain intensity difference (PID) scores generally favored the active treatments over placebo from 1 to 6 hours (with the exception of 1.5 hours) after dosing (P < or = 0.016) and favored celecoxib over the other treatments at 7 and 8 hours after dosing (P < 0.001). The active treatments demonstrated superior summed PID scores through 8 hours (P < 0.001), significantly shorter median times to onset of analgesia (P < 0.05), and significantly longer median times to first use of rescue medication (P < 0.05). During the MDAP, more hydrocodone/acetaminophen-treated patients (20%) than celecoxib-treated patients (12%) required rescue medication (P < 0.05), and the celecoxib group had significantly lower maximum pain intensity scores (P < 0.001, days 2-5), required fewer doses of study medication (P < or = 0.01, days 3-5), and had superior scores on a modified American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (P < or = 0.013). In addition, a significantly lower proportion of celecoxib-treated patients experienced adverse events (43%) compared with hydrocodone/acetaminophen-treated patients (89%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Over 8 hours, patients with moderate to severe pain after orthopedic surgery experienced comparable analgesia with single doses of celecoxib and hydrocodone/acetaminophen. Over a 5-day period, oral doses of celecoxib 200 mg taken 3 times a day demonstrated superior analgesia and tolerability compared with hydrocodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 1000 mg taken 3 times a day. Most patients required no more than 2 daily doses of celecoxib 200 mg for the control of their postorthopedic surgical pain.

Cox-2-specific inhibitors: definition of a new therapeutic concept.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been a mainstay in the treatment of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. However, these agents can result in severe and occasionally life-threatening adverse effects that can limit therapeutic benefit. Progress toward safer anti-inflammatory therapy was aided by the discovery that cyclooxygenase (COX) exists as two isozymes, COX-1 and COX-2. Both isozymes form prostaglandins that support physiologic functions; however, the formation of proinflammatory prostaglandins is catalyzed by COX-2. Inhibition of COX-2 accounts for the anti-inflammatory and analgesic action of NSAIDs; however, concurrent inhibition of COX-1 inhibits prostaglandin-dependent mechanisms such as gastroduodenal mucosal defense and platelet aggregation. This inhibition is the basis of the gastrointestinal toxicity and bleeding characteristic of these drugs. These findings led to the hypothesis that agents that selectively inhibit COX-2 would possess anti-inflammatory and analgesic action but would spare COX-1, thereby avoiding adverse effects in the gastrointestinal tract and platelets. Selective COX-2 inhibitors are now available. The novelty of these agents has raised questions in the medical community as to what constitutes selectivity for COX-2. This review outlines the criteria that must be met to characterize a compound as COX-2-specific. Clinical evidence of clear improvement in gastrointestinal tolerability and safety must be demonstrated in addition to complementary evidence of COX-2 selectivity obtained from enzyme, biochemical, and clinical pharmacology evaluations.

Reduced incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers with celecoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, compared to naproxen in patients with arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) block prostaglandin production by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX); they are believed to cause gastroduodenal damage by inhibiting the COX-1 isoform and to have analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the COX-2 isoform. As compared to conventional NSAIDs, celecoxib, a COX-2 specific inhibitor, has been shown in previous single posttreatment endoscopy studies to be associated with lower gastroduodenal ulcer rates. In response to concerns that such studies may under-represent ulceration rates, the present serial endoscopy study was designed to compare cumulative gastroduodenal ulcer rates associated with the use of celecoxib to those of naproxen, a conventional NSAID. METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study, 537 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were randomized to treatment with celecoxib 200 mg b.i.d. (n = 270) or naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. (n = 267) for 12 wk. Gastroduodenal damage was determined from esophagogastroduodenoscopy after 4, 8, and 12 wk of therapy. Arthritis efficacy was evaluated with Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments. RESULTS: Gastroduodenal ulcer rates after celecoxib and naproxen treatment were 4% versus 19% in the 0-4 wk interval (p < 0.001), 2% versus 14% in the 4-8 wk interval (p < 0.001), and 2% versus 10% in the 8-12 wk interval (p < 0.001), respectively. After 12 wk of treatment, the cumulative incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers was 9% with celecoxib and 41% with naproxen. In the celecoxib group, gastroduodenal ulcers were significantly associated with Helicobacter pylori status (p < 0.05), concurrent aspirin usage (p = 0.001), and a history of ulcer (p = 0.010), but not with disease type (OA/RA), age, gender, other relevant medical histories, or concurrent corticosteroid or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs usage (p > 0.05). Celecoxib produced a significantly lower incidence rate of both gastric (p < 0.001) and duodenal (p < 0.030) ulcers. The two agents produced similar improvements in Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments of arthritis efficacy. The incidence of adverse events and withdrawal rates did not differ significantly between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to naproxen (500 mg b.i.d.), use of celecoxib (200 mg b.i.d.), a COX-2 specific agent, at the recommended RA dose and twice the most frequently prescribed OA dose, was associated with lower rates of gastric, duodenal, and gastroduodenal ulcers but had comparable efficacy, in patients with OA and RA.

Celecoxib versus diclofenac in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: A clinical trial was conducted in 600 patients with OA of the knee to test the hypothesis that the specific COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, has equivalent efficacy and a superior tolerability/safety profile when compared to diclofenac, the current worldwide standard of care. METHODS: Patients were administered celecoxib 100 mg BID, diclofenac 50 mg TID or placebo for 6 weeks in a multicentre, double-blind. placebo-controlled trial. RESULTS: Primary efficacy measures (index joint pain by VAS, WOMAC index) indicated statistically significant improvement versus placebo for both celecoxib and diclofenac and no statistically significant differences between celecoxib and diclofenac. American Pain Society (APS) measures to assess the rapidity of onset of action showed statistically significant and comparable pain relief versus placebo within 24 h for both celecoxib and diclofenac. More diclofenac patients reported GI side effects than patients treated with either placebo or celecoxib. Diclofenac-treated patients experienced statistically significant elevations in mean hepatic transaminases and serum creatinine and reductions in haemoglobin concentration when compared to placebo, events not observed with celecoxib. CONCLUSION: Celecoxib 200 mg daily is as effective as diclofenac 150 mg daily for relieving signs and symptoms of OA of the knee, including pain, and has a rapid onset of action. However, celecoxib appears to have a superior safety and tolerability profile.

Comparative efficacy and safety of celecoxib and naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is responsible for more disability of the lower extremities in the elderly than any other disease in the US. The pain associated with OA is the primary symptom leading to disability in these patients. Current ACR guidelines recommend consideration of acetaminophen for mild-to-moderate pain and conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or COX-2 specific inhibitors for moderate-to-severe OA symptoms. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the COX-1 sparing, COX-2 specific inhibitor, celecoxib, with the conventional NSAID naproxen, and placebo, in the treatment of OA of the hip. In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 1061 patients with symptomatic OA of the hip were randomized to receive celecoxib at doses of 100 mg, 200 mg, or 400 mg/day; naproxen 1000 mg/day; or placebo, for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated using standard measures of efficacy at baseline, 2-4 days after discontinuing previous NSAID or analgesic therapy, and after 2, 6, and 12 weeks of treatment. All doses of celecoxib and naproxen significantly improved the symptoms of OA, at all time points compared with placebo. This sustained treatment effect of celecoxib was dose dependent. In terms of pain relief and improvement in functional capacity, celecoxib 200 mg/day and 400 mg/day were similarly efficacious and were comparable to naproxen. Both drugs were generally well tolerated. Celecoxib at a dose of 200 mg/day is as effective as a standard therapeutic dose of the conventional NSAID, naproxen, in reducing the pain associated with OA of the hip.

Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: A randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study.

CONTEXT: Conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with a spectrum of toxic effects, notably gastrointestinal (GI) effects, because of inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1. Whether COX-2-specific inhibitors are associated with fewer clinical GI toxic effects is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether celecoxib, a COX-2-specific inhibitor, is associated with a lower incidence of significant upper GI toxic effects and other adverse effects compared with conventional NSAIDs. DESIGN: The Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study (CLASS), a double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted from September 1998 to March 2000. SETTING: Three hundred eighty-six clinical sites in the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 8059 patients (>/=18 years old) with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were enrolled in the study, and 7968 received at least 1 dose of study drug. A total of 4573 patients (57%) received treatment for 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib, 400 mg twice per day (2 and 4 times the maximum RA and OA dosages, respectively; n = 3987); ibuprofen, 800 mg 3 times per day (n = 1985); or diclofenac, 75 mg twice per day (n = 1996). Aspirin use for cardiovascular prophylaxis (

Upper gastrointestinal tolerability of celecoxib, a COX-2 specific inhibitor, compared to naproxen and placebo.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability of celecoxib, naproxen, and placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: An analysis of 5, 12-week, randomized, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled clinical trials was conducted. In these trials, patients were randomized to: naproxen 500 mg bid (n = 1,099), placebo (n = 1,136), celecoxib 50 mg bid (n = 690) (subtherapeutic dose), celecoxib 100 mg (n = 1,131) or 200 mg bid (n = 1,125) (therapeutic dose), or celecoxib 400 mg bid (n = 434) (supratherapeutic dosage). The incidence and time until moderate to severe abdominal pain, dyspepsia, nausea, and any of the aforementioned 3 upper GI symptoms (composite endpoint) were determined using time-to-event analysis. RESULTS: The cumulative incidences of moderate to severe abdominal pain, dyspepsia, or nausea (composite endpoint) were: naproxen 500 mg (12.0%; 95% CI 9.9%-14.0%), celecoxib 50 mg bid (7.1%; 95% CI 5.0%-9.2%), celecoxib 100 mg bid (7.8%; 95% CI 6.0%-9.5%), celecoxib 200 mg bid (8.1%; 95% CI 6.4%-9.9%), celecoxib 400 mg bid (6.0%; 95% CI 3.6%-8.4%), and placebo (8.5%; 95% CI 6.5%-10.8%). After controlling for independent predictors of the composite endpoint, relative risks (RR) for the various treatments relative to naproxen 500 mg bid were: celecoxib 50 mg (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.37-0.77; p < 0.001), celecoxib 100 mg (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45-0.80; p < 0.001), celecoxib 200 mg bid (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.83; p = 0.001), celecoxib 400 mg bid (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.35-0.89; p = 0.015), and placebo (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.85; p = 0.002). After controlling for independent predictors of the composite endpoint, celecoxib treatment group patients did not differ from placebo patients when reporting the composite endpoint, with p values ranging from 0.40 to 0.96. CONCLUSION: The upper GI tolerability of celecoxib is superior to naproxen. A dose-response relationship between celecoxib and upper GI symptoms was not apparent.

Reduced risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcer complications with celecoxib, a novel COX-2 inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the rate of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) ulcer complications (bleeding, perforation, or gastric outlet obstruction) associated with celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, compared with the rate associated with nonspecific, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: A pooled analysis was conducted of 14 multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and a separate analysis of one long-term open label trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of celecoxib for symptomatic treatment of arthritis. The RCTs enrolled 11,008 patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis treated for 2-24 wk; the long-term open label trial enrolled 5,155 patients receiving celecoxib for a maximum of 2 yr. In the RCTs, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 1,864; 208 patient-years), celecoxib 25-400 mg b.i.d. (n = 6,376; 1,020 patient-years), or a comparator NSAID (n = 2,768; 535 patient-years); NSAIDs were naproxen 500 mg b.i.d., diclofenac 50 or 75 mg b.i.d., or ibuprofen 800 mg t.i.d.). In the long-term, open-label trial, patients received celecoxib 100-400 mg b.i.d. for up to 2 yr (n = 5,155; 5,002 patient-years). The principal outcome measure of this analysis was development of a UGI ulcer complication, which was prospectively defined as bleeding, perforation, or gastric outlet obstruction. Ulcer complications were assessed and adjudicated by persons blinded to the patient's treatment assignment or the study in which the patient participated. RESULTS: In the RCTs, UGI ulcer complications occurred in no placebo patients (0 of 1,864 patients), in 2 of 6,376 celecoxib patients (0.03%), and in 9 of 2,768 patients receiving an NSAID (0.33%), corresponding to annual incidences of 0.20% for celecoxib (p > 0.05 vs placebo) and 1.68% for NSAIDs (p = 0.002 vs celecoxib and placebo). In the long-term open-label trial, nine UGI ulcer complications occurred, for an incidence of 0.17% and an annualized incidence of 0.18%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of UGI ulcer complications associated with celecoxib was 8-fold lower than with nonspecific NSAIDs. The incidence of ulcer complications observed in celecoxib-treated patients was similar to that in patients receiving placebo in the RCTs, and to that in non-NSAID users reported in the literature.

Celecoxib does not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics or hypoprothrombinemic effect of warfarin in healthy subjects.

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of celecoxib, an anti-inflammatory/analgesic agent that primarily inhibits COX-2 and not COX-1 at therapeutic doses, on the steady-state pharmacokinetic profile and hypoprothrombinemic effect of racemic warfarin in healthy volunteers. Twenty-four healthy adult volunteers on maintenance doses of racemic warfarin (2-5 mg daily), stabilized to prothrombin times (PT) 1.2 to 1.7 times pretreatment PT values for 3 consecutive days, were randomized to receive concomitant celecoxib (200 mg bid) or placebo for 7 days in an open-label, multiple-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of warfarin pharmacokinetics and PT. Steady-state exposure of S- and R-warfarin (area under the curve [AUC]) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) in subjects receiving celecoxib were within 2% to 8% of the warfarin AUC and Cmax in subjects receiving placebo during the concomitant treatment period. In addition, PT values were not significantly different in subjects receiving warfarin and celecoxib concomitantly compared with subjects receiving warfarin and placebo. In conclusion, concomitant administration of celecoxib has no significant effect on PT or steady-state pharmacokinetics of S- or R-warfarin in healthy volunteers.

Effects of celecoxib and naproxen on renal function in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase 2-specific inhibitor, with the nonspecific cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 inhibitor naproxen on renal function in 29 healthy elderly subjects in a single-blind, randomized, crossover study. METHODS: Subjects received either celecoxib, 200 mg twice daily, for 5 days followed by celecoxib, 400 mg twice daily, for the next 5 days, or they received naproxen, 500 mg twice daily, for 10 days. After a 7-day washout, subjects were crossed over to receive the other regimen. RESULTS: After the first dose, the trend was for a greater decrease in glomerular filtration rate with naproxen (-5.31 mL/min per 1.73 m2) compared with celecoxib (-0.86 mL/min per 1.73 m2). The treatment difference became statistically significant on day 6 (-7.53 vs -1.11 mL/min per 1.73 m2 for naproxen and celecoxib, respectively; P=.004). Urinary prostaglandin E2 and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1alpha excretion was significantly reduced from baseline across the treatment interval with both celecoxib and naproxen (P< or =.04). There were no significant differences in prostaglandin excretion between these 2 agents (P> or =.07). Small, transient decreases (P<.05) in urinary sodium excretion were observed after the initiation of both celecoxib and naproxen treatment. Sodium excretion values returned to baseline by the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that cyclooxygenase 2-specific inhibition in healthy elderly subjects may spare renal hemodynamic function, although the effects on sodium excretion, as well as urinary prostaglandin E2 and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1alpha excretion, appear to be similar to those of nonspecific cyclooxygenase inhibitors such as naproxen.

Effects of celecoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, on platelet function in healthy adults: a randomized, controlled trial.

Conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) nonspecifically inhibit cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), an enzyme critical to normal platelet function, and COX-2, which mediates inflammatory response mechanisms. Celecoxib, an antiarthritic agent that inhibits COX-2 but spares COX-1 at therapeutic doses, is expected to have minimal effects on platelet function. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 10 days' duration was conducted in 24 healthy adults to compare the effects on platelet function of a supratherapeutic dose of celecoxib (600 mg bid) with a standard dose of naproxen (500 mg bid), a conventional NSAID. Ex vivo platelet aggregation in response to standard agonists (collagen, arachidonate, or U46619 [a thromboxane A2 receptor agonist]), bleeding time, and serum thromboxane B2 (TxB2) level were measured. Unlike celecoxib or placebo, naproxen produced statistically significant reductions in platelet aggregation and serum TxB2 levels and increased bleeding time. The results indicate that even at supratherapeutic doses, celecoxib will not interfere with normal mechanisms of platelet aggregation and hemostasis, supporting the premise that celecoxib is COX-1 sparing relative to conventional NSAIDs.

The hepatic safety and tolerability of the novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib.

Celecoxib is a cyclooxygenase- (COX)-1-sparing inhibitor of COX-2 that is indicated for the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Many agents used for treating these diseases, both symptom-modifying and disease-modifying, are associated with the potential for hepatotoxicity. This article presents an analysis of the hepatic effects of celecoxib in 14 controlled studies of patients with arthritis (2 to 24 weeks' duration), in a long-term, open-label safety study (as long as 2 years), in 11 studies of patients receiving treatment for pain after oral or orthopedic surgery (up to 5 days' duration), and in five pharmacology studies. The overall incidence of hepatic adverse events in arthritis patients receiving celecoxib was similar to that for placebo but significantly lower than in the combined group of patients receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The most commonly reported hepatic adverse events were elevations in liver transaminase levels, most of which occurred in patients receiving diclofenac. Similarly, clinically significant elevations of transaminase levels occurred more frequently with NSAIDs than with celecoxib. A pharmacology study performed in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment showed that celecoxib did not produce any clinically relevant changes from baseline in creatinine clearance, alanine aminotransferase, or bilirubin values in these settings. In the four interaction studies performed with drugs metabolized in the liver, none of the adverse events was hepatic in nature, and no clinically relevant liver function test abnormalities occurred. In conclusion, this analysis suggests that celecoxib has a very low potential for hepatic toxicity, even after exposures of as long as 2 years at therapeutic doses.

Renal safety and tolerability of celecoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor.

The novel cyclooxygenase- (COX)-2 inhibitor celecoxib is an effective treatment for the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Conventional treatment for these debilitating conditions routinely involves the use of conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which are nonspecific inhibitors of COX-1 and COX-2. Numerous studies suggest that inhibition of renal prostaglandin synthesis by NSAIDs is deleterious to kidney function, particularly in high-risk patients. As celecoxib inhibits COX-2 and spares COX-1 at therapeutic doses, we hypothesized that it may offer an improved renal safety profile in patients at risk for NSAID-induced renal toxicity. This article represents a post hoc analysis of the renal safety of celecoxib, using the safety database generated during its clinical development program. This analysis includes data from more than 50 clinical studies involving more than 13,000 subjects. Most subjects were enrolled in randomized, controlled trials (of up to 12 weeks' duration); however, more than 5000 subjects received celecoxib for as long as 2 years in a long-term, open-label study at as much as twice the maximum recommended dosage. The overall incidence of renal adverse events after celecoxib was greater than that after placebo but similar to that after NSAIDs. The most common events reported after celecoxib, namely, peripheral edema (2.1%), hypertension (0.8%), and exacerbation of preexisting hypertension (0.6%), were not time- or dose-related. Peripheral edema was not associated with increased weight or blood pressure. Furthermore, there was no evidence of drug-drug interactions between celecoxib and concomitant angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or diuretics. We conclude that celecoxib is well tolerated by patients who may be at risk for NSAID-induced renal toxicity, such as the elderly and those with hypertension or preexisting chronic heart disease.

Treatment of osteoarthritis with a once-daily dosing regimen of celecoxib: a randomized, controlled trial.

A previous study has shown celecoxib 100 mg b.i.d. to be comparably effective to naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. in treating osteoarthritis (OA). The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of a once-daily regimen of celecoxib (200 mg q.d.) to the 100 mg b.i.d. regimen in treating the signs and symptoms of OA. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study, 686 patients with OA of the knee in a flare state were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib 100 mg b.i.d. (N = 231), celecoxib 200 mg q.d. (N = 223), or the placebo (N = 232) for 6 weeks. Arthritis assessments were performed at baseline and at weeks 2 and 6, or at early termination. In all measurements of efficacy, at all assessments, improvements from baseline in both celecoxib groups were statistically superior to those in the placebo group (p

Celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, has no significant effect on methotrexate pharmacokinetics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of celecoxib, a specific inhibitor of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) on the renal clearance and plasma pharmacokinetic profile of stable methotrexate (MTX) doses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Fourteen adult female patients with RA taking a stable weekly dose of MTX (5 to 15 mg/wk) for a minimum of 3 months were randomized to receive concomitantly either celecoxib (200 mg BID) or placebo for a period of 7 days in a single blind, 2 period crossover study of MTX pharmacokinetics and renal clearance. RESULTS: The plasma pharmacokinetic profile of MTX did not change significantly when celecoxib or a placebo was coadministered. The mean renal clearance of MTX alone, 7.98+/-2.18 l/h, was virtually unchanged by coadministration of celecoxib (7.94+/-1.61 l/h) or placebo (7.97+/-1.19 l/h). CONCLUSION: Celecoxib has no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics or renal clearance of MTX in patients with RA, although these results should be confirmed in prospective studies of elderly and renally impaired patients.

Celecoxib versus diclofenac in long-term management of rheumatoid arthritis: randomised double-blind comparison.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit cyclo-oxygenase (COX), which leads to suppression of COX-1-mediated production of gastrointestinal-protective prostaglandins. Gastrointestinal injury is a common outcome. We compared the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of long-term therapy with celecoxib, a COX-1 sparing inhibitor of COX-2, with diclofenac, a non-specific COX inhibitor. METHODS: 655 patients with adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis of at least 6 months' duration were randomly assigned oral celecoxib 200 mg twice daily or diclofenac SR 75 mg twice daily for 24 weeks. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity and tolerability were assessed at baseline, every 4 weeks, and at week 24. We assessed gastrointestinal safety by upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy within 7 days of the last treatment dose at centres where the procedure was available. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. FINDINGS: 430 patients underwent endoscopy (celecoxib n=212, diclofenac n=218). The two drugs were similar in management of rheumatoid arthritis pain and inflammation. Gastroduodenal ulcers were detected endoscopically in 33 (15%) patients treated with diclofenac and in eight (4%) in the celecoxib group (p<0.001). The rate of withdrawal for any gastrointestinal-related adverse event, most commonly abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and dyspepsia, was nearly three times higher in the diclofenac-treated group than in the celecoxib group (16 vs 6%; p<0.001). INTERPRETATION: Celecoxib showed sustained anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity similar to diclofenac, with a lower frequency of upper gastrointestinal ulceration or gastrointestinal adverse events, and tolerability was better.

Anti-inflammatory and upper gastrointestinal effects of celecoxib in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: In vitro studies have shown that celecoxib inhibits cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) but not COX-1, suggesting that this drug may have anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity without adverse upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract effects that result from COX-1 inhibition. OBJECTIVE: To test whether celecoxib has efficacy as an anti-inflammatory and analgesic with reduced GI tract mucosal damage compared with conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial lasting 12 weeks, with follow-up at weeks 2, 6, and 12, from September 1996 thorugh February 1998. SETTING: Seventy-nine clinical sites in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: A total of 1149 patients aged 18 years or older with symptomatic rheumatoid arthritis who met inclusion criteria were randomized; 688 (60%) of these completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive celecoxib, 100 mg, 200 mg, or 400 mg twice per day (n = 240, 235, and 218, respectively); naproxen, 500 mg twice per day (n = 225); or placebo (n = 231). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis as assessed using standard measures of efficacy and GI tract safety as assessed by upper GI tract endoscopy before and after treatment, compared among treatment groups. RESULTS: All dosages of celecoxib and naproxen significantly improved the signs and symptoms of arthritis compared with placebo. Maximal anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity was evident within 2 weeks of initiating treatment and was sustained throughout the 12 weeks. The incidence of endoscopically determined gastroduodenal ulcers in placebo-treated patients was 4 (4%) of 99, and the incidences across all dosages of celecoxib were not significantly different (P>.40): 9 (6%) of 148 with 100 mg twice per day, 6 (4%) of 145 with 200 mg twice per day, and 8 (6%) of 130 with 400 mg twice per day. In contrast, the incidence with naproxen was 36 (26%) of 137, significantly greater than either placebo or celecoxib (P<.001). The overall incidences of GI tract adverse effects were 19% for placebo; 28%, 25%, and 26% for celecoxib 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg twice per day, respectively; and 31 % for naproxen. CONCLUSION: In this study, all dosages of celecoxib were efficacious in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and did not affect COX-1 activity in the GI tract mucosa as evidenced by less frequent incidence of endoscopic ulcers compared with naproxen.