RESUMO
It is important to increase manufacturing speed to make medicines more widely available. One bottleneck for CHO-based drug substance release is the in vitro viral (IVV) cell-based assay on unprocessed bulk. To increase process speed, we evaluate the suitability of replacing the IVV cell-based assay with next-generation sequencing (NGS). First, we outline how NGS is currently used in the pharmaceutical industry, and how it may apply to CHO virus testing. Second, we examine CHO virus contamination history. Since prior virus contaminants can replicate in the production bioreactor, we perform a literature search and classify 159 viruses as high, medium, low, or unknown risk based on their ability to infect CHO cells. Overall, the risk of virus contamination during the CHO manufacturing process is low. Only six viruses were reported to have contaminated CHO bioprocesses over the past several decades, and were primarily caused by fetal bovine serum or cell culture components. These virus contamination events can be mitigated through limitation and control of raw materials, combined with virus testing and virus clearance technologies. The list of CHO infectious viruses provides a starting framework for virus safety risk assessment and NGS development. Furthermore, ICH Q5A (R2) includes NGS as a molecular method for adventitious agent testing, paving a path forward for modernizing CHO virus testing.
RESUMO
The Consortium on Adventitious Agent Contamination in Biomanufacturing (CAACB) collected historical data from 20 biopharmaceutical industry members on their experience with the in vivo adventitious virus test, the in vitro virus test, and the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) for viral safety. Over the past 20 years, only three positive in vivo adventitious virus test results were reported, and all were also detected in another concurrent assay. In more than three cases, data collected as a part of this study also found that the in vivo adventitious virus test had given a negative result for a sample that was later found to contain virus. Additionally, the in vivo adventitious virus test had experienced at least 21 false positives and had to be repeated an additional 21 times all while using more than 84,000 animals. These data support the consideration and need for alternative broad spectrum viral detection tests that are faster, more sensitive, more accurate, more specific, and more humane. NGS is one technology that may meet this need. Eighty one percent of survey respondents are either already actively using or exploring the use of NGS for viral safety. The risks and challenges of replacing in vivo adventitious virus testing with NGS are discussed. It is proposed to update the overall virus safety program for new biopharmaceutical products by replacing in vivo adventitious virus testing approaches with modern methodologies, such as NGS, that maintain or even improve the final safety of the product.
