Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(5): 463-469, 2024 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38124347

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Facial aesthetic surgery encompasses a variety of procedures with complication rates that are difficult to estimate due to a lack of published data. OBJECTIVES: We sought to estimate major complication rates in patients undergoing facial aesthetic procedures and develop a risk assessment tool to stratify patients. METHODS: We utilized the Tracking Operation and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons (TOPS) database from 2003-2018. The analytic database included major facial aesthetic procedures. Univariate analysis and a backward stepwise multivariate regression model identified risk factors for major complications. Regression coefficients were utilized to create the score. Performance robustness was measured with area under receiver operating characteristic curves and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: A total of 38,569 patients were identified. The major complication rate was 1.2% (460). The regression model identified risk factors including over 3 concomitant surgeries, BMI ≥25, ASA class ≥2, current or former smoker status, and age ≥45 as the variables fit for risk prediction (n = 13,004; area under curve: 0.68, standard error: 0.013, [0.62-0.67]). Each of the 5 variables counted for 1 point, except over 3 concomitant surgeries counting for 2, giving a score range from 0 to 6. Sensitivity analysis showed the cutoff point of ≥3 to best balance sensitivity and specificity, 58% and 66%, respectively. At this cutoff, 65% of cases were correctly classified as having a major complication. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an acceptable risk prediction score with a cutoff value of ≥3 associated with correctly classifying approximately 65% of those at risk for major morbidity when undergoing face and neck aesthetic surgery.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Medição de Risco , Morbidade , Estética , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 10(6): e4393, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35765677

RESUMO

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), specifically deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major complication in plastic surgery; however, there is a paucity of evidence about the incidence of VTE in the craniofacial subpopulation. We investigated the incidence and risk factors for VTE in the adult craniofacial trauma population. Methods: This retrospective review identified patients from the 2016 and 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample with a diagnosis for an initial encounter of a facial fracture. International Classification of Disease codes identified patients with DVT or PE. Groups were identified: adult craniofacial patients with and without a VTE diagnosis. The groups were analyzed to determine risk factors for developing a VTE during inpatient admissions. Results: A total of 203,240 patients were identified based on a diagnosis for an initial encounter of a facial fracture. Among those, 3350 (1.65%) were diagnosed with a DVT and 1455 (0.72%) with a PE. Risk factors for VTE were male sex (P = 0.011), longer hospital stay (P = 0.000), and higher Elixhauser comorbidity index (P = 0.000). Additionally, PE was an independent predictor of mortality [odds ratio (OR), 2.129] but DVT was not (OR, 1.148). Cranial and frontal fractures were independently associated with an increase in DVT (OR, 2.481) and PE (OR, 1.489). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that craniofacial trauma patients are at risk for VTE and should be risk-stratified for chemoprophylaxis therapy. Further studies in thromboembolism prophylaxis for facial fractures are warranted as the data are limited.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...