Clinical Evaluation of Pink Esthetic Score of Immediately Impressed Posterior Dental Implants.

PURPOSE: While comparative outcome results for peri-implant crestal bone levels, mucosal margin position, and peri-implant indices have been reported, no studies are available that evaluate and compare the esthetic result of impressions performed immediately at implant placement with that of impressions performed on healed implants. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the pink esthetic score of posterior implants restored with an immediate impression workflow compared to implants restored with a delayed impression workflow. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight eligible participants who had received a single implant crown either in the premolar or molar regions at least 4 months before the study, were identified by an electronic health record review and scheduled for a single-visit study appointment. Esthetic outcomes were measured using the pink esthetic score. Several local- and prosthesis-related factors were recorded and their association with the selected outcome was assessed. Two-sample t-test was used for comparisons between the groups. RESULTS: Pink esthetic score ranged between 4 and 12 (mean: 8). No significant difference between immediate (8.36 ±1.12) and delayed (7.76 ±2.14) impression workflow groups were seen for the total PES (p = 0.25). In addition, individual comparisons between immediately and delayed impressed implants for mesial papilla (1.27 ±0.47; 0.88 ±0.78), distal papilla (0.73 ±0.65; 0.76 ±0.83), tissue margin (1.73 ±0.47; 1.47 ±0.51), tissue contour (1.27 ±0.65; 0.82 ±0.64), alveolar process (0.82 ±0.60; 1.00 ±0.87), color (1.27 ±0.65; 1.29 ±0.69), and texture (1.36 ±0.50; 1.53 ±0.62) did not show significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that the pink esthetic score is not significantly different between single posterior implants impressed with immediate and delayed implant workflows.

Clinical Evaluation of Crestal Bone Levels, Peri-Implant Indices, and Mucosal Margin Position of Immediately Impressed Posterior Dental Implants: A Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: This is a cross-sectional clinical study to evaluate crestal bone levels, mucosal margin position, probing depths, bleeding on probing, and plaque and bleeding indices of implants restored with an immediate impression workflow compared to implants restored with a delayed impression workflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had received a posterior single implant crown in the premolar and molar regions were identified and scheduled for a single-visit study appointment. Outcome measurements included soft tissues peri-implant indices, peri-implant mucosal margin position, and crestal bone levels. Several systemic-, local-, and prosthesis-related factors were recorded. Bitewing radiographs were used to assess crestal bone levels. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the medians of continuous measurements and Pearson chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test) was used to compare the distributions of categorical variables between the two groups. RESULTS: Twenty eight patients were included. Crestal bone levels, peri-implant mucosal margin position and peri-implant soft tissue parameters for the immediately impressed group were not statistically different from the delayed impressed group, except for probing depth for the immediately impressed buccal site, which was less than that of the delayed group. Mesial bone level for cement-retained crowns was significantly more coronal than for screw-retained ones. CONCLUSIONS: While an isolated statistical difference was found in probing depth, the current study suggests that there is no clinically significant difference between implants impressed with immediate and delayed implant workflows when considering crestal bone levels, peri-implant mucosal margin position, and most peri-implant indices.

Immediate digital implant scanning workflow for posterior single implant-supported crowns: A case series.

This case series presents an innovative technique for fabricating single implant crowns in which a digital scan was recorded immediately after the placement of the dental implant. This technique has been used over several years (January 2015 to April 2018) in 34 patients. The detailed workflow of 2 clinical treatments with successful clinical outcomes and short treatment time is described. The immediate digital implant scan workflow concept reduces treatment time for posterior single implant-supported crowns.