Clinicians' access to diagnostic imaging information at an academic center: perceived impact on patient management.

We studied the efficiency with which clinicians were able to obtain the results of radiologic studies during visits to the radiology department in an effort to determine how often delays occurred and, if so, how they were perceived to have influenced patient care. We monitored 322 physician's visits to four locations within the radiology department in search of imaging information or consultative services. The average duration of these visits was 6.2 min (range, 38 sec-55 min). Two hundred forty-three visits (75%) were completed successfully, and 10 additional visits were for consultation purposes only. In 43% of the 69 unsuccessful visits, physicians indicated that lack of access to imaging information would definitely (38%) or possibly (6%) result in delays in diagnosis and/or therapy. In 17% of the unsuccessful visits, physicians indicated that the inability to access imaging information would definitely (13%) or possibly (4%) extend the patient's length of stay in the hospital. Our study suggests that better access to imaging information may prevent delays in patient management decisions, thereby substantially reducing costs and potentially improving patient care.

Does knowledge of the clinical history affect the accuracy of chest radiograph interpretation?

To examine the effect that a concise, objective, and potentially computer-extractable history would have on diagnostic accuracy in the interpretation of chest radiographs, we designed and tested a computerized patient-history form that could be integrated realistically into the clinical environment. We performed a series of studies in which 247 posteroanterior normal (79) and abnormal (168) chest radiographs were interpreted by four board-certified radiologists, both with and without accompanying clinical histories. The radiologists recorded their confidence rating of the presence or absence of one or more of the following abnormalities: interstitial disease, nodule, and pneumothorax. Analysis of receiver operating characteristics showed that, with the exception of interpretation of one abnormality by one radiologist, there were no statistically significant differences (p less than .05) between cases interpreted with and without the history form for any of the radiologists. The results of our study suggest that knowledge of clinical history does not affect the accuracy of chest radiograph interpretations for the detection of interstitial disease, nodules, and pneumothoraces. These results may not be applicable to other clinical situations.

Evaluation of analog contrast enhancement and digital unsharp masking in low-contrast portal images.

An experimental high-contrast sensitivity storage phosphor imaging system was used to produce double-exposure localization portal images of abdominal and pelvic treatment fields. The images were contrast enhanced by using an analog windowing technique and edge enhanced with a digital unsharp masking routine. A laser printer was used to print the storage phosphor images onto film. Conventional images were obtained by placing film in the cassette with the storage phosphor plates prior to exposure. Four radiation oncologists rated the storage phosphor and conventional films for perceptibility of anatomical detail needed to verify the placement of the treatment field. Contrast enhancement alone did not result in a significant improvement in perceptibility over unprocessed conventional film (p greater than 0.20). However, the combination of contrast and edge enhancement did result in a significant improvement over conventional film (p less than 0.05).

Verification of electron beam therapy with conventional and storage phosphor images: preliminary experience.

Portal verification images were generated by the photon contamination in electron beams produced by a linear accelerator during treatment of patients receiving high-energy electron radiation therapy. Both conventional and storage phosphor methods yielded projection radiographs in which anatomy of the irradiated and surrounding tissue was demonstrated. Exposed phantoms were used to confirm that the images represent a true projection of the radiation field. A preliminary series of 22 cases was evaluated by two radiotherapists and judged subjectively to be of clinical value. Geometric error, or more importantly, the lack thereof, during high-energy electron treatments was easily confirmed with this method. In three cases, the treatment protocol was corrected based on the images obtained. Because the readout process of storage phosphor images allows for gain adjustments and post-processing, the images obtained with this method were found to delineate anatomy in the treated and surrounding tissues somewhat more consistently than could conventional images.