Adjuvant chemotherapy and acute toxicity in hypofractionated radiotherapy for early breast cancer.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of chemotherapy to the acute toxicity of a hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) schedule for breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 116 breast cancer patients with T1, 2N0Mx. The patients received 3-D conformal radiotherapy with a total physical dose of 50.54 Gy or 53.2 Gy in 19 or 20 fractions according to stage, over 23-24 d. The last three to four fractions were delivered as a sequential tumor boost. All patients were monitored for acute skin toxicity according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The maximum monitored value was taken as the final grading score. Multivariate analysis was performed for the contribution of age, chemotherapy and 19 vs 20 fractions to the radiation acute skin toxicity. RESULTS: The acute radiation induced skin toxicity was as following: grade I 27.6%, grade II 7.8% and grade III 2.6%. No significant correlation was noted between toxicity grading and chemotherapy (P = 0.154, χ(2) test). The mean values of acute toxicity score in terms of chemotherapy or not, were 0.64 and 0.46 respectively (P = 0.109, Mann Whitney test). No significant correlation was also noted between acute skin toxicity and radiotherapy fractions (P = 0.47, χ(2) test). According to univariate analysis, only chemotherapy contributed significantly to the development of acute skin toxicity but with a critical value of P = 0.05. However, in multivariate analysis, chemotherapy lost its statistical significance. None of the patients during the 2-years of follow-up presented any locoregional relapse. CONCLUSION: There is no clear evidence that chemotherapy has an impact to acute skin toxicity after an HFRT schedule. A randomized trial is needed for definite conclusions.

Chemoradiotherapy combined with intracavitary hyperthermia for anal cancer: feasibility and long-term results from a phase II randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate in a randomized way the clinical benefit of addition of intracavitary hyperthermia (ICHT) to a conventional chemoradiotherapy schedule in patients with T2-T3N0M0 anal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin-C combined with radiotherapy with (arm A: 24 patients) or without ICHT (arm B: 25 patients). A microwave applicator operating at 433 MHz inserted into the anal-rectal cavity was used for ICHT. Patients in both arms received 1000 mg/m2 per day of 5-FU on days 1-4 and days 28-31 plus 15 mg/m mitomycin-C on day 1. Radiotherapy was administered with a dose of 41.4 Gy (1.8 Gy per fraction) plus a booster dose of 14 Gy (2 Gy per fraction). RESULTS: One patient from group A developed severe mucositis, whereas no severe morbidity was noted in the rest of the patients in both groups. The incidence of lower-intestine acute reactions was higher in the ICHT arm. After a 5-year follow up in the hyperthermia arm, 23 of 24 patients (95.8%) preserved their anorectal function and avoided permanent colostomy, whereas in the second arm, 17 of 25 (68.0%) had sphincter preservation. Local recurrence-free survival time was significantly higher in the ICHT arm (P = 0.0107, log rank test), whereas no significant difference in overall survival was noted. CONCLUSION: The addition of ICHT to the chemoradiotherapy schedule of anal cancer seems to offer a new effective and safe therapeutic modality. The preservation of anorectal function seems to be the significant clinical benefit of adjuvant ICHT.

Duration of bisphosphonate treatment: results of a non-randomised study in patients previously treated with local irradiation for bone metastases from breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess whether disodium pamidronate (DP) once started should be given life-long in women with lytic bone metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and three women with breast cancer who had at least one osteolytic lesion received 180 mg of DP as a 2-h intravenous infusion given every 4 weeks for a life-time, following local radiotherapy. After six cycles, 26 out of 103 patients (25%) refused to continue their bisphosphonate-treatment. Thus two groups were constituted: non-stop (group A) and premature discontinued (group B). The new skeletal complication free survival (NSCFS) was the primary endpoint verified during extramural review. Performance status, pain-score and biochemical markers were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Generally DP was well tolerated. At 36 months, the proportion of patients having had any skeletal complication was 54.5 and 84.6% in group A and B, respectively. The median time of NSCFS was apparently longer for group A. In group A, the pain score and the ECOG status were significantly lower, while the overall survival appeared to be longer. Multivariate analysis revealed age, nodal status and interruption of treatment as prognostic factors to NSCFS, with relative risk 1.05, 2.3 and 1.5 respectively. CONCLUSION: Data concerning the suspension of new skeletal complications, as well as the apparent improvement of overall survival, pain score and ECOG status, suggest that the pamidronate-treatment should not be stopped once started. These results should be confirmed in a randomised trial.

Re-irradiation in conjunction with liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of skin metastases of recurrent breast cancer: a radiobiological approach and 2 year of follow-up.

Thirty patients with local relapses after radical mastectomy and radiotherapy and undergoing infusion of liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m(2) monthly for 6 months) were randomized to receive re-irradiation. Radiotherapy was with either 17 fractions of 1.8 Gy, 5 days a week (N=15, group A) or 4 Gy plus two fractions of 3 Gy the 1st week and six fractions of 3 Gy given every second day (N=15, group B). Eight patients from group A (53.3%) and nine patients (60%) from group B demonstrating a clinically complete response (P=0.9). Grade I/II acute skin toxicity was monitored in 26.6% of patients in group A versus 73.3% in group B. The radiation schedule of group A seems superior for grade I/II acute (P=0.027) and late (P=0.015) skin toxicity. The linear quadratic model enabled the prediction of tumor response as well as normal skin reactions.

Liposomal doxorubicin in conjunction with reirradiation and local hyperthermia treatment in recurrent breast cancer: a phase I/II trial.

PURPOSE: This is the first study to evaluate the tolerability and activity of liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx; Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals) < or =60 mg/km(2) in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer, when administered in conjunction with reirradiation and local hyperthermia treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Fifteen female patients, who had undergone a radical mastectomy and conventional radiotherapy (60 Gy) in the front chest wall, were entered on a multimodal protocol consisting of initial treatment with radiotherapy and a monthly infusion of liposomal doxorubicin < or =60 mg/m(2) in conjunction with local hyperthermia treatment. All patients received reirradiation up to a total dose of 30.6 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction, 5 days a week). To evaluate the drug's safety, the first 5 patients initially received a dose of 40 mg/m(2) liposomal doxorubicin, which was then escalated to 60 mg/m(2). The other 10 patients received 60 mg/m(2) for all six cycles of chemotherapy. Hyperthermia (HT) was produced in the region of interest (ROI) using waveguides at a frequency of 433 MHz. The RSS was obtained from the curves representing the change in the ROI's surface with time for each patient, as fitted by linear regression. Linear regression analysis was used to study the relationship between the time interval from liposomal doxorubicin infusion to HT and the RSS. RESULTS: At doses of < or =60 mg/m(2), liposomal doxorubicin was well tolerated, with only mild hematological and nonhematological toxicity. All patients showed an objective measurable response, with 3 patients (20%) demonstrating a clinically complete response. There was a significant correlation between the duration of response and Avg Min T(90) > 44 degrees C (r(s) = 0.917, P < 0.0001) and the Mean[Tmin] (r(s) = 0.909, P < 0.0001). The RSS was significantly correlated with the interval between liposomal doxorubicin infusion and HT, as the smaller the time interval, the greater the clinical benefit (r = 0.76, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The multimodal treatment was effective and well tolerated, producing an objective measurable response in all patients. Local HT had a significant effect on patients' response to the drug. The relationship between thermal dose and liposomal action requires further investigation.