Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lab Med ; 54(3): 227-234, 2023 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36226897

RESUMO

A burdensome, atypical phenotype of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) called S aureus small colony variant (SA-SCV) has been identified, which is induced as a result of a combination of environmental stressors, including polymicrobial interactions. The SA-SCVs exhibit altered phenotypes as a result of metabolic dormancy caused by electron transport deficiency, leading to increased biofilm production and alterations to antimicrobial susceptibility. The SA-SCVs typically exhibit altered colony morphology and biochemical reactions compared with wild-type SA, making them difficult to detect via routine diagnostics. The SA-SCVs have been found to contribute to chronic or recurrent infections, including skin and soft-tissue infections, foreign-body associated infection, cystic fibrosis, and sepsis. There is evidence that SA-SCVs contribute to patient morbidity and mortality as a result of diagnostic difficulties and limited treatment options. New detection methods may need to be developed that can be incorporated into routine diagnostics, which would allow for better assessment of specimens and introduce new considerations for treatment.


Assuntos
Infecções Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus aureus , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/metabolismo , Relevância Clínica , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia
2.
Int Wound J ; 18(5): 626-638, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33565263

RESUMO

Wound biofilms must be identified to target disruption and bacterial eradication but are challenging to detect with standard clinical assessment. This study tested whether bacterial fluorescence imaging could detect porphyrin-producing bacteria within a biofilm using well-established in vivo models. Mouse wounds were inoculated on Day 0 with planktonic bacteria (n = 39, porphyrin-producing and non-porphyrin-producing species, 107  colony forming units (CFU)/wound) or with polymicrobial biofilms (n = 16, 3 biofilms per mouse, each with 1:1:1 parts Staphylococcus aureus/Escherichia coli/Enterobacter cloacae, 107  CFU/biofilm) that were grown in vitro. Mouse wounds inoculated with biofilm underwent fluorescence imaging up to Day 4 or 5. Wounds were then excised and sent for microbiological analysis. Bacteria-matrix interaction was assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and histopathology. A total of 48 hours after inoculation with planktonic bacteria or biofilm, red fluorescence was readily detected in wounds; red fluorescence intensified up to Day 4. Red fluorescence from biofilms persisted in excised wound tissue post-wash. SEM and histopathology confirmed bacteria-matrix interaction. This pre-clinical study is the first to demonstrate the fluorescence detection of bacterial biofilm in vivo using a point-of-care wound imaging device. These findings have implications for clinicians targeting biofilm and may facilitate improved visualisation and removal of biofilms.


Assuntos
Infecção dos Ferimentos , Animais , Bactérias , Biofilmes , Camundongos , Imagem Óptica , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Infecção dos Ferimentos/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...