Real-world treatment patterns of adjuvant endocrine therapy and ovarian suppression in premenopausal HR+/HER2+ breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) premenopausal breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. Moreover, the benefit and clinical indications of ovarian suppression (OS) is poorly elucidated. We described real-world patterns surrounding choice of ET and clinicopathologic features which predicted treatment with OS in a contemporary cohort of premenopausal women with HR+/HER2+ BC. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included premenopausal patients with nonmetastatic HR+/HER2+ BC from the CancerLinQ Discovery database from January 2010 to May 2020. Women were less than 50 years and received chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy, and ET. They were categorized into 1 of 4 groups based on type of ET prescribed at initiation: aromatase inhibitor (AI) + OS, OS, tamoxifen + OS, or tamoxifen. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between clinicopathologic features and OS use. RESULTS: Out of 360,540 patients with BC, 937 were included. The majority (n = 818, 87%) were prescribed tamoxifen, whereas 4 (0.4%), 50 (5.3%), and 65 (6.9%) received OS, tamoxifen + OS and AI + OS, respectively. No clinicopathologic features predicted OS use apart from age; patients <35 years were more likely to receive OS compared with those ≥35 years (odds ratio 2.33, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first real-world study evaluating ET treatment patterns in HR+/HER2+ premenopausal BC. OS use was uncommon and the majority received tamoxifen as the preferred ET regardless of most clinicopathologic risk factors. Additional research is needed to optimize ET decisions in young women with this distinct BC subtype.

Ovarian Suppression: Early Menopause, Late Effects.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pre-menopausal women diagnosed with hormone receptor (HR) breast cancer are candidates for prolonged hypoestrogenism to improve cancer outcomes. However, the disease benefit eclipses the toxicities associated with ovarian function suppression (OFS), which are often under-reported. RECENT FINDINGS: Increased risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease, bone disorders, and metabolic disorders is well reported in women with no history of cancer, after surgical oophorectomy or premature ovarian failure. Vasomotor symptoms, urogenital atrophy, weight gain, sexual dysfunction, cognitive decline, and sleep disturbances contribute to the increased non-compliance associated with OFS, especially in younger women. Balancing the toxicities of prolonged OFS with its benefits should be critically analyzed by providers when making recommendations for their patients. Supportive care to manage multi-system toxicities and to counteract the long-term impact on all-cause mortality should be emphasized by every cancer program. Future studies with OFS should incorporate patient outcomes and strategies for symptom management in addition to focusing on improving disease outcomes.

Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)is a common type of liver cancer with a poor prognosis, especially in patients with advanced stages or underlying liver disease. While surgical resection, liver transplantation, and ablation therapies have traditionally been the mainstay of treatment for HCC, radiation therapy has become increasingly recognized as an effective alternative, particularly for those who are not surgical candidates. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a highly precise form of radiation therapy that delivers very high doses of radiation to the tumor while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. Several studies have reported favorable outcomes with SBRT in HCC treatment. Moreover, SBRT can be used to treat recurrent HCC after prior treatment, offering a potentially curative approach in select cases. While SBRT has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in treating HCC, future studies are needed to further investigate the potential role of SBRT in combination with other treatments for HCC.

Clinical efficacy of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are key tumor suppressor genes that are essential for the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway. Loss of function mutations in these genes result in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes, which comprise approximately 5% of cases. BRCA1/2 mutations are associated with younger age of diagnosis and increased risk of recurrences. The concept of synthetic lethality led to the development of PARP inhibitors which cause cell cytotoxicity via the inhibition of PARP1, a key DNA repair protein, in cells with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Although still poorly understood, the most well-acknowledged proposed mechanisms of action of PARP1 inhibition include the inhibition of single strand break repair, PARP trapping, and the upregulation of non-homologous end joining. Olaparib and talazoparib are PARP inhibitors that have been approved for the management of HER2-negative breast cancer in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. This review article highlights the clinical efficacy of PARP inhibitors in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer in early and advanced settings.

Reconstructive complications and early toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with proton-based postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Background: Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) decreases the risk of locoregional recurrence and increases overall survival rates in patients with high-risk node positive breast cancer. While the number of breast cancer patients treated with proton-based PMRT has increased in recent years, there is limited data on the use of proton therapy in the postmastectomy with reconstruction setting. In this study, we compared acute toxicities and reconstructive complications in patients treated with proton-based and photon-based PMRT. Methods: A retrospective review of our institutional database was performed to identify breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy with implant or autologous reconstruction followed by PMRT from 2015 to 2020. Baseline clinical, disease, and treatment related factors were compared between the photon-based and proton-based PMRT groups. Early toxicity outcomes and reconstructive complications following PMRT were graded by the treating physician. Results: A total of 11 patients treated with proton-based PMRT and 26 patients treated with photon-based PMRT were included with a median follow-up of 7.4 months (range, 0.7-33 months). Six patients (55%) in the proton group had a history of breast cancer (3 ipsilateral and 3 contralateral) and received previous RT 38 months ago (median, range 7-85). There was no significant difference in mean PMRT (p = 0.064) and boost dose (p = 0.608) between the two groups. Grade 2 skin toxicity was the most common acute toxicity in both groups (55% and 73% in the proton and photon group, respectively) (p = 0.077). Three patients (27%) in the proton group developed grade 3 skin toxicity. No Grade 4 acute toxicity was reported in either group. Reconstructive complications occurred in 4 patients (36%) in the proton group and 8 patients (31%) in photon group (p = 0.946). Conclusions: Acute skin toxicity remains the most frequent adverse event in both proton- and photon-based PMRT. In our study, reconstructive complications were not significantly higher in patients treated with proton- versus photon-based PMRT. Longer follow-up is warranted to assess late toxicities.

Uveitis, a rare but important complication of adjuvant zoledronic acid for early-stage breast cancer.

Bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid are an important part of adjuvant therapy to reduce the risk of recurrence in early-stage breast cancer. Uveitis remains one of the lesser-known side effects of zoledronic acid; prompt recognition is essential to ensure patients receive appropriate and timely care to help prevent permanent vision loss. We report a case of anterior uveitis in a postmenopausal woman who presented with visual symptoms after receiving the first dose of zoledronic acid. This case report serves to educate and increase awareness of the risk of uveitis in patients who are given zoledronic acid. This is the first and only reported case of zoledronic acid when used in the adjuvant setting for the treatment of breast cancer.

Early Toxicity and Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcomes in Patients Treated With Adjuvant Proton-Based Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the dosimetric data, early toxicity, and patient-reported cosmetic outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant proton-based radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by proton-based RT from 2015 to 2020. Patient-reported cosmetic outcomes were graded as excellent, good, fair, or poor. Early toxicity outcomes were graded by the treating physician during treatment. Dose-volume histograms were reviewed to obtain dosimetry data. RESULTS: We identified 21 patients treated with adjuvant proton-based RT. Median whole breast dose delivered was 46.8 Gy (range, 40.0-50.4 Gy). Target volumes included the regional lymph nodes in 17 patients (81%). Seventeen patients (81%) received a lumpectomy boost. The median planning target volume V95 was 94% (range, 77%-100%), V100 71% (range, 60%-97%), V110 2% (range 0%-18%), and median max point dose was 115% (range, 105%-120%). The median ipsilateral breast V105 was 367.3 cc (range, 0-1172 cc) and V110 was 24.1 cc (range, 0-321.3 cc). Grade 2 and 3 dermatitis occurred in 62% and 14% of patients, respectively. Grade 2 and 3 pain was reported by 33% and 10% of patients, respectively. Median follow-up at the time of cosmetic evaluation was 27 months (range, 5-42 months). Four patients (21%) reported fair cosmetic outcome and 15 patients (79%) reported good or excellent cosmetic outcome. No poor cosmesis was reported. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant proton-based radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery is well tolerated with acceptable rates of acute toxicities and a high rate of good-to-excellent patient-reported cosmetic outcomes.

Patterns of postmastectomy radiation therapy in clinically node-positive breast cancerpatients with pathologically negative lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To analyze postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) utilization and its association with overall survival (OS) in patients presenting with node-positive breast cancer who are pathologically node-negative (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with clinical T1-4 node-positive nonmetastatic breast cancer who received NAC and underwent mastectomy with pathologically negative lymph node sampling. Multivariable regression models identified factors associated with PMRT use. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate predictors of mortality. RESULTS: The study included 8766 clinically node-positive patients who met the study criteria. PMRT was delivered to 61.5% of patients. Overall PMRT utilization rate increased over the study period from 54.4% in 2004 to 65.2% in 2011. Predictors of PMRT use included larger tumor size, increasing clinical N stage, higher grade disease, receipt of hormone therapy, and a greater number of lymph nodes examined. The unadjusted 5-year OS was 84.1% in the PMRT group and 83.8% in the non-PMRT group (p = NS). PMRT was not significantly associated with survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.03). DISCUSSION: The delivery of PMRT has increased over time in women presenting with clinically node-positive breast cancer who convert to ypN0 after NAC. While we identified multiple independent socioeconomic and clinical predictors of both PMRT utilization and survival, PMRT itself was not significantly associated with survival.

Does the Use of BioZorb® Result in Smaller Breast Seroma Volume?

AIM: To evaluate the impact of BioZorb®, a 3D-bioabsorbable marker, on the tumor-bed boost volume and dosimetric parameters in adaptive boost planning for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records were reviewed for 51 breast-cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant whole-breast irradiation between January 2017 and October 2018. Changes in lumpectomy boost volume (LBV), doses to organs at risk, toxicity and cosmesis were compared between patients with and without BioZorb® Chi-square test and paired and independent t-tests were used for comparisons of variables. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 35.5 months. Mean LBV on initial CT (LBV1; 32.2 vs. 33.8 cc, p=0.74) and on boost computed tomography (CT) (LBV2; 25.3 vs. 24.8 cc, p=0.87) were similar with and without BioZorb® The mean decrease from LBV1 to LBV2 was 9.0 cc and 6.8 cc with and without BioZorb®, respectively (p=0.42). LBV1 was significantly positively correlated with a 20% reduction in LBV (p=0.02). Mean heart and lung doses on adaptive boost planning CT were slightly lower compared to initial planning CT in both groups. Acute breast pain was reported in 18/51 patients, 9 of whom had BioZorb® (p=0.24). Grade-2 pain was reported in 5/51 patients, 3 of whom had BioZorb® (p=0.11). Excellent or good cosmesis was reported in 36/41 patients. Fair cosmesis was reported in 5/41 patients, of whom 2 had BioZorb® (p=0.64). CONCLUSION: BioZorb® placement does not impact the tumor-bed boost volume nor the variation of seroma volume within the period of treatment. More data and longer follow-up are needed to identify a measurable clinical impact of BioZorb® placement.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: The Search for the Optimal Biomarker.

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a high-risk and aggressive malignancy characterized by the absence of estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) on the surface of malignant cells, and by the lack of overexpression of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2). It has limited therapeutic options compared to other subtypes of breast cancer. There is now a growing body of evidence on the role of immunotherapy in TNBC, however much of the data from clinical trials is conflicting and thus, challenging for clinicians to integrate the data into clinical practice. Landmark phase III trials using immunotherapy in the early-stage neoadjuvant setting concluded that the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy improved the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate compared to chemotherapy with placebo while others found no significant improvement in pCR. Phase III trials have investigated the utility of immunotherapy in previously untreated metastatic TNBC, and these studies have similarly arrived at inconsistent conclusions. Some studies showed no benefit while others demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in overall survival in the PD-L1 positive population. It is not yet clear which biomarkers are most useful, and assays for these biomarkers have not been standardized. Given the often serious and severe side effects of immunotherapy, it is important and necessary to identify predictive biomarkers of response and resistance in order to enhance patient selection. In this review, we will discuss both the challenges of traditional biomarkers and the opportunities of emerging biomarkers for patient selection.

Patterns of post-mastectomy radiation therapy in clinically node positive breast cancer patients with pathologically negative lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To analyze postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) utilization and its association with overall survival (OS) in patients presenting with node positive breast cancer who are pathologically node negative (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with clinical T1-4 node-positive non-metastatic breast cancer who received NAC and underwent mastectomy with pathologically negative lymph node sampling. Multivariable regression models identified factors associated with PMRT use. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate predictors of mortality. RESULTS: The study included 8,766 clinically node-positive patients who met the study criteria. PMRT was delivered to 61.5% of patients. Overall PMRT utilization rate increased over the study period from 54.4% in 2004 to 65.2% in 2011. Predictors of PMRT use included larger tumor size, increasing clinical N stage, higher grade disease, receipt of hormone therapy, and greater number of lymph nodes examined. Unadjusted 5-year OS was 84.1% in the PMRT group and 83.8% in the non-PMRT group (p=NS). PMRT was not significantly associated with survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.03). CONCLUSION: The delivery of PMRT has increased over time in women presenting with clinically node positive breast cancer who convert to ypN0 after NAC. While we identified multiple independent socioeconomic and clinical predictors of both PMRT utilization and survival, PMRT itself was not significantly associated with survival.

Clinical and Pharmacologic Differences of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer.

Targeted therapies such as Cyclin Dependent Kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors have improved the prognosis of metastatic hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer by combating the resistance seen with traditional endocrine therapy. The three approved agents currently in the market are palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. Besides the overall similarities associated with CDK4/6 inhibition, there are differences between the three approved agents that may explain the differences noted in unique clinical scenarios- monotherapy, patients with brain metastases or use in the adjuvant setting. This review article will explore the preclinical and pharmacological differences between the three agents and help understand the benefits seen with these agents in certain subgroups of patients with metastatic HR positive breast cancer.

Utilization of Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiotherapy With Concurrent Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (Hypo-RT) is now considered the standard of care for the majority of patients receiving whole-breast irradiation (WBI). However, there are few data on the use of Hypo-RT in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients receiving concurrent anti-HER2 therapy. In this study, we sought to examine patterns of WBI in HER2-positive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base, we identified women with nonmetastatic HER2-positive breast cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 who received WBI. The Hypo-RT group was defined as those receiving 21 or fewer fractions. All other patients were in the conventional radiotherapy (RT) group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of Hypo-RT utilization. Five-year overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The study included 15,776 patients, of whom 17.7% received Hypo-RT. The rate of Hypo-RT utilization increased from 7.4% in 2010 to 29.3% in 2015 (P = .004). Predictors of Hypo-RT use included older age (≥60 vs. < 60 years), higher median income quartile, further distance from the treatment facility (>50 vs. ≤50 miles), treatment at an academic facility, and later year of diagnosis. Unadjusted 5-year overall survival rates were similar among patients who received Hypo-RT and conventional RT (93.9% vs. 95.2%, P = .26). After adjusting for patient, facility, and tumor variables, Hypo-RT was not significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSION: Although Hypo-RT was not commonly delivered in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, the utilization rate quadrupled over the study period. Multiple socioeconomic and clinical predictors of Hypo-RT receipt were identified. Adjuvant RT regimen was not significantly associated with overall survival.

Psychoneurological symptom cluster in breast cancer: the role of inflammation and diet.

Patients with breast cancer experience treatment-related symptoms which are unlike side effects associated with therapy such as surgery, chemotherapy or radiation. These symptoms are collectively referred to as symptoms cluster and include concurrent physical and/or psychosocial symptoms. Psychoneurological symptom cluster has been used to describe fatigue, mood changes, cognitive and sleep disturbances and pain seen in patients diagnosed with cancer. The etiology of psychoneurological symptom cluster is unclear; however, inflammation has been shown to play a role. High quality diets defined as diets rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains and polyunsaturated fatty acids and low in added sugar have been shown to decrease inflammation in patients. This article reviews the role of inflammation and high quality diet on the prevalence of psychoneurological symptoms clusters.