How Nurses Influence the Patient Experience.

This article is one in a series from Press Ganey-a health care performance improvement organization-that will discuss the many facets of the human experience in health care. Using the latest national data, the series will explore the intersections of safety, reliability, experience, and service, and their impact on engagement, work culture, and nurse-sensitive outcomes. Each installment will be designed as a "deep dive" into the most recent thinking and evidence-based approaches to improvement of the patient experience with a particular focus on practical and implementable tactics in each of the above subject areas.

Gendered Health Outcome Among Somali Refugee Youth in Displacement: A Role of Social Support and Religious Belief.

This study examines the factors influencing physical health status, specifically focusing on the gender differences in risk and promotive factors affecting health outcomes among Somali refugee youth displaced in Nairobi, Kenya (n = 227). A survey was used to assess participants' physical health along with psychosocial factors, somatic symptoms, and demographic characteristics. The study shows that religious belief and somatic symptoms among the total sample were significant predictors in influencing the outcome of physical health. A moderated mediation analysis and logistic regression analyses also revealed gender differences in associated factors as well as health status; female participants reported higher somatic symptoms, associated with a decline in physical health, whereas the protective effect of social support and religious belief promote was found only among male counterparts. Future studies and interventions would be benefited from a gender-specific approach to health promotion and coping mechanisms in this population.

Methodologies for Evaluating the Usability of Rehabilitation Technologies Aimed at Supporting Shared Decision-Making: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: The field of rehabilitation has seen a recent rise in technologies to support shared decision-making (SDM). Usability testing during the design process of SDM technologies is needed to optimize adoption and realize potential benefits. There is variability in how usability is defined and measured. Given the complexity of usability, a thorough examination of the methodologies used to measure usability to develop the SDM technologies used in rehabilitation care is needed. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to answer the following research questions: which methods and measures have been used to produce knowledge about the usability of rehabilitation technologies aimed at supporting SDM at the different phases of development and implementation? Which parameters of usability have been measured and reported? METHODS: This review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework. An electronic search was performed in the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases from January 2005 up to November 2020. In total, 2 independent reviewers screened all retrieved titles, abstracts, and full texts according to the inclusion criteria and extracted the data. The International Organization for Standardization framework was used to define the scope of usability (effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction). The characteristics of the studies were outlined in a descriptive summary. Findings were categorized based on usability parameters, technology interventions, and measures of usability. RESULTS: A total of 38 articles were included. The most common SDM technologies were web-based aids (15/33, 46%). The usability of SDM technologies was assessed during development, preimplementation, or implementation, using 14 different methods. The most frequent methods were questionnaires (24/38, 63%) and semistructured interviews (16/38, 42%). Satisfaction (27/38, 71%) was the most common usability parameter mapped to types of SDM technologies and usability evaluation methods. User-centered design (9/15, 60%) was the most frequently used technology design framework. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this scoping review highlight the importance and the complexity of usability evaluation. Although various methods and measures were shown to be used to evaluate the usability of technologies to support SDM in rehabilitation, very few evaluations used in the included studies were found to adequately span the selected usability domains. This review identified gaps in usability evaluation, as most studies (24/38, 63%) relied solely on questionnaires rather than multiple methods, and most questionnaires simply focused on the usability parameter of satisfaction. The consideration of end users (such as patients and clinicians) is of particular importance for the development of technologies to support SDM, as the process of SDM itself aims to improve patient-centered care and integrate both patient and clinician voices into their rehabilitation care.

Born in displacement: Psychosocial and mental health impacts of country of birth among urban Somali refugee youth.

Urban refugees often face tremendous adversities during displacement that exacerbate mental health and psychosocial outcomes. Given the lack of research on how extended displacement affects mental health in urban refugee youth, this study examines the differential effects of country of birth on trauma exposure and psychosocial factors that influence mental health experiences among Somali refugee youth in urban Kenya (n = 303). Findings reveals that childhood trauma and impeded social functioning predicted mental health outcomes. Being born in Kenya was a significant predictor of poor mental health despite there being no significant difference in trauma exposures and psychosocial factors between Somali-born and Kenya-born youth. This difference can be attributed to prolonged displacement, disrupted development of cultural identity, and discrimination experienced in the host country. Given the widely devastating effects of childhood trauma and community violence, mental health interventions need to be two-prolonged: addressing and preventing intergenerational trauma sequelae through family-based interventions; and community-level programs and advocacy for safety and protection for the displaced. Our findings also emphasize that future interventions for urban refugee communities should be inclusive to all community members, considering shared vulnerability to community violence as well as intergenerational transmission of traumas through childhood adversities and lacking support.

Linkages between health systems and communities for chronic care: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Linkages between health systems and communities may leverage community assets to address unmet needs and provide services for improved continuity and coordination of care. However, there are limited examples of specific strategies for such linkages for chronic disease management. Guided by a local need from stakeholders, this scoping review aims to clarify and map methods and strategies for linkages between communities and health systems across chronic diseases, to inform future implementation efforts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scoping review will be conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and latest Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, with continuous stakeholder engagement throughout. A structured literature search of records from January 2001 to April 2022 will be completed in MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, in addition to grey literature. Two reviewers will independently complete study selection following inclusion criteria reflecting population (chronic disease), concept (integrated care) and context (health systems and communities) and will chart the data. Data will be analysed using descriptive qualitative and quantitative methods, to map and operationalise the linkages between health systems and communities. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review does not require ethics approval as it will examine and collect data from publicly available materials, and all stakeholder engagement will follow guidelines for patient and public involvement. Findings will be reported through a summarising list of considerations for different linkage strategies between health systems and community resources and implications for future research, practice and policy will be discussed and presented. The results will also be used to inform an integrated knowledge translation project to implement community-health system linkages to support chronic pain management. REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UTSN9.

Utilisation of calcium sulphate beads in one-stage aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) affects many revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients, contributing to a concomitant rise in revision costs. Means of decreasing the risk of PJI include the use of antibiotic adjuncts, such as calcium sulphate beads (CSBs). Mixed with antibiotics, the potential benefits of CSBs include dissolvability and antibiotic drug elution. However, information comparing them in aseptic revision is scarce. Therefore, this study investigated CSB utilisation for infection prevention in aseptic revision THA. Specifically, we compared (1) infection rates; (2) lengths of stay; (3) subsequent infection procedures; and (4) final surgical outcome in 1-stage aseptic revision THA patients who did received CSBs to 1-stage aseptic revision THA patients who did not. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients who underwent an aseptic revision THA between January 2013 and December 2017. Patients who received CSBs (n = 48) were compared to non-CSB patients (n = 58) on the following outcomes: postoperative infections, lengths of stay (LOS), subsequent irrigation and debridements (I+Ds), and final surgical outcome, classified as successful THA reimplantation, retained antibiotic spacer, or Girdlestone procedure. Chi-square and t-testing were used to analyse the variables. RESULTS: There was no significant differences found between CSB patients and non-CSB patients in postoperative infections (p = 0.082), LOS (p = 0.179), I+Ds (p = 0.068), and final surgical outcome (p = 0.211). CONCLUSION: This study did not find any statistical difference between CSBs and standard of care in infection rates and surgical outcomes. The advantage of these beads for 1-stage aseptic revisions is questionable.

Impacts of COVID-19 on Refugee Service Provision and Community Support: A Rapid Assessment during the Pandemic.

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has significant impacts on refugee populations and created social, economic as well as public health crises that led to multipronged challenges and barriers to resettlement services and community support. This study aims to explore the impacts of the pandemic on refugee service provision from the standpoint of refugee-serving professionals, refugee community leaders, and volunteers. Using rapid evaluation and appraisal methods, we conducted individual and focus group interviews with 42 key stakeholders in refugee services, followed by a brief online survey with 69 service providers. A thematic analysis revealed how preexisting are conflated with emergent barriers during the pandemic and how such cumulative adversities experienced by the refugee community have widened the gaps in social services and healthcare as well as social support within the refugee community. This study proposes several implications for future research and policy in social work with refugee populations during the post-COVID time.

Medical students’ experiences of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A phenomenological study / The Health Sciences Journal

INTRODUCTION@#The COVID-19 pandemic forced Philippine medical schools to adapt their curriculum design to fit an online setup. This study aimed to analyze and interpret the lived experiences of medical students who experienced online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and to explore the adaptations to online learning.@*METHODS@#This is an interpretive phenomenological study using purposive sampling. Participants were 1st to 3rd year medical students enrolled for Academic Year 2020-2021. Participants were interviewed online by a psychologist who was not part of the research team using a 13-question guide. The interviews were recorded and transcribed. Interview data were analyzed and interpreted using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA).@*RESULTS@#Nine medical students were interviewed. The IPA identified six superordinate themes: 1) positive adaptations through positive reframing; 2) resulting mental health concerns; 3) intrinsic and extrinsic concerns encountered; 4) self-awareness as a first step towards adjustment; 5) dual role of family; and 6) perceptions on systemic response. @*CONCLUSION@#Online medical education during the pandemic resulted in problems and mental health concerns among participants, and many developed self-awareness and positive adaptations specific to the online setup. Participants’ families helped some adjust, while others posed an additional challenge. Both positive and negative perceptions of the systemic response of the school also arose.

A Glimpse Into the Magnet® Program Office: The High-Performing Senior Magnet® Program Analyst Team.

The Magnet Recognition Program® has a dedicated team of RNs and non-RNs who are committed to advancing nursing and supporting healthcare organizations on their Magnet® journeys. Healthcare organizations who are either Magnet-designated or applicants for Magnet designation regularly communicate with the various members of the Magnet program office team. This perspective will highlight the roles of the senior Magnet program analysts and the assistant director of Magnet program operations.

Effectiveness and harms of clinical decision support systems for referral within chronic pain practice: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a common public health problem with negative consequences for individuals and societies. Fortunately, interdisciplinary chronic pain management has been shown to be effective for improving patients' outcomes and strongly recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Appropriate referral within the healthcare system based on individuals' needs and available services is essential to optimise health-related outcomes and maximise resources. Clinical decision support systems have been shown to be effective for supporting healthcare professionals in different practices. However, there is no knowledge synthesis on clinical decision support systems for referral within chronic pain practice. We aim to identify the clinical decision support systems for referral within chronic pain practices and assess their content, effectiveness, harms, and validation parameters. METHODS: Using the methodology of Cochrane reviews, we will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis based on studies meeting the following criteria: Population, patients with chronic pain and/or healthcare professionals working in chronic pain; Intervention, clinical decision support systems for referral within chronic pain practice; Comparison, any other clinical tool, any usual care or practices; Outcomes, clinical outcomes of patients measuring how patients feel, function or survive including benefits, adverse effects, continuity of care, care appropriateness, care satisfaction, quality of life, healthcare professional performance, and cost outcomes; and Study design: randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, before and after controlled studies and interrupted time series. We will search relevant literature with the support of an information specialist using Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, CINHAL, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from their inception onwards. Two reviewers will independently complete study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. We will analyse data to perform both narrative syntheses and meta-analysis if appropriate. DISCUSSION: Findings of this review will contribute to enhancing chronic pain care and research. Clinical decision support systems identified as effective in this review can be investigated for implementation in clinical practice and impact on improving patient, clinical and health system outcomes. Clinical decision support systems not yet ready for implementation that require further improvement will also be identified. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration: CRD42020158880 .

Modified Allograft Reconstruction of a Disrupted Patella Tendon: A Technical Case Report.

CASE: A 19-year-old woman with a history of Hoffa fat pad syndrome underwent infrapatellar fat pad synovectomy and subsequently developed extensor mechanism disruption secondary to iatrogenic patellar tendon injury. She received a modified extensor mechanism patella-patellar tendon-tibial tubercle allograft to restore extensor function with satisfactory results at 2-year follow-up. We also review alternative techniques that were considered for her extensor mechanism repair. CONCLUSION: The patient demonstrated satisfactory outcomes, similar to other established techniques. This modified extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction may be an effective alternative for patients experiencing acute extensor mechanism disruptions.

Factors associated with non-home discharge after total knee arthroplasty: Potential for cost savings?

INTRODUCTION: Increasing demand for total knee arthroplasties (TKA) has been targeted by legislation to minimize costs and maximize outcomes. Home discharges reduce costs, and it is important to determine patient variables associated with this discharge disposition. We explored non-modifiable and modifiable factors associated with non-home discharges to determine what patient specific factors require attention. METHODS: This retrospective study included 171,903 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) patients between 2011 and 2016. Patient specific variables and discharge destinations included home, short-term nursing facilities (SNF), not home, and rehabilitation. Chi-squared analyses and analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted for categorical and continuous data, respectively. Multinomial regression model was utilized to assess associations between discharge destination and patient specific variables. RESULTS: Every year increase above the mean age (66 years) was associated with a nine percent (p < .001) and six percent (p < .001) increased odds for discharge to SNF or rehabilitation, respectively, compared to home discharges. Every 10% increase in BMI from the mean was associated with a 10% increase in discharge to both SNF and rehabilitation (p < .001 for both). CONCLUSION: With increasing demands for TKAs and expenditures to Medicare, evaluating factors that impact patient discharge can help optimize costs and outcomes of TKA procedures. Arthroplasty surgeons can benefit by recognizing these correlations and exploring reductions to non-home discharges through pre-operative patient optimization. Future studies should evaluate the economic cost potential associated with optimizing routine home discharge in TKA patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Sex-Specific Analysis at Two Time Points in Three High-Impact Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Journals.

PURPOSE: To determine how well the orthopaedic sports medicine literature reported sex-specific analysis (SSA) in 2011 and 2016. METHODS: The 3 highest-impact orthopaedic sports medicine subspecialty journals (American Journal of Sports Medicine; Arthroscopy; and Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy) were selected for review. Two independent investigators reviewed all journal issues published during 2 different calendar years (2011 and 2016). All randomized controlled, prospective and retrospective group, and case-control studies were included. Studies were stratified into those that involved SSA, where sex was a variable in a multifactorial statistical model, and those that only reported sex as a demographic characteristic or used sex-matched groups without further analysis. RESULTS: A total of 960 studies evaluating 3,400,569 patients met criteria and were included in this review. Although 44.4% of the overall study population was female, only 293 (30.5%) studies included patient sex as variable in a multifactorial statistical model. The proportion of studies that performed SSA did not differ between 2011 (29.6%) and 2016 (31.1%; P = .607), although publications from American Journal of Sports Medicine were likely to report SSA (P < .05). Of the 293 studies that reported SSA, 91 (31%) demonstrated a significant difference in outcomes. The most commonly reported differences were in outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament, medial patellofemoral ligament, and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; autograft preparation; postoperative use of opiates following arthroscopy; and recovery after sports-related concussions. CONCLUSIONS: Although most sports medicine studies include approximately 50% female and 50% male patients, statistical analysis differentiating the 2 subsets is not routinely performed. Only 30.5% of all studies performed SSA, 31% of which reported a statistically significant difference in the data when comparing outcomes between male and female patients with the same treatment modalities. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The current study demonstrates that the orthopaedic sports medicine subspecialty literature is lacking in reporting SSA, and that there has been minimal improvement over a 5-year time period. In addition, this study highlights the high percentage of significant findings within the studies that performed SSA and underscores the differences in sex-specific injury patterns and treatment outcomes.