Complementary and Alternative Medicine Mind-Body Approaches Used Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse Adolescents.

PURPOSE: The aim of this paper is to examine complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among racially and ethnically diverse adolescents. Greater understanding of CAM use among this group is warranted to better inform health care providers in delivering a culturally relevant health promotion approach. DESIGN AND METHODS: A secondary data analysis was conducted using the 2012 Child Complementary and Alternative Medicine Supplement of the National Health Interview Survey (CAM-NHIS) data, which was collected from a national sample of adolescents aged 12-17 years. A logistic regression test was employed to investigate the predictors associated with CAM use among racially and ethnically diverse adolescents. RESULTS: While Black and Hispanic adolescents were the least likely to use CAM compared to their White counterparts, families with higher incomes, higher education attainment, and adolescents who experienced pain were more likely to use CAM. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest the need for future research to gain a greater understanding of CAM use among racially and ethnically diverse adolescents, and insights into how health disparities impact CAM use. Greater understanding of how CAM use intersects with health beliefs and outcomes is also warranted. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Based on the CAM-NHIS survey, few racially and ethnically diverse adolescents have reported use of CAM. Development of culturally appropriate instruments and methods to assess CAM use among racially and ethnically diverse adolescents may yield specific data for this population. Informed health care providers can advocate for improved access to CAM for minority adolescents and alter disparate use.

Clinician accountability in a primary care clinic time-interval blood pressure measurements study: Practice implications.

BACKGROUND: Accurate blood pressure measurements (BPM) are important, as clinicians are tasked daily with using such measurements to make clinical diagnoses and patient care judgments. Research studies and controlled trials hold such measurements to a higher standard than everyday clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate difference in BPM outcomes of individuals in a clinic setting when clinicians collect BPM as usual vs BPM after 5- (USPSTF recommendation) and 10- minute (study unique intervention) timed rest interval. METHODS: A repeated-measures design was used to examine individual BPMs at the intervals of baseline, after a 5-minute rest interval post-baseline, and after a 10-minute rest interval post-baseline. Results Pairwise comparisons indicated that baseline SBP was the highest when compared to SBP measured at both 5- and 10-minutes post-baseline. SBP measured at 5-minutes was also significantly higher compared to SBP collected at 10-minutes post-baseline (ps < .05). For DBP, the repeated-measures ANOVA indicated that there was no significant difference across BPMs, F(2,198) = 1.25, p = .29. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study revealed that implementing a 5-minute rest interval before BPMs are taken in a clinic setting produces a "clinically observable" reduction in the overall mean systolic BPs as seen at both 5- and 10-minute BPM intervals. It is important for all healthcare clinicians to recognize the importance of accurate BPM and the need to encourage better regulated BPM standard in everyday practice.