Personal and Interpersonal Factors Moderate the Relation Between Human-Made Trauma and Hypertension: A Path Analysis Approach.

BACKGROUND: Although the link between trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and hypertension is established, its underlying mechanisms remain underexplored. OBJECTIVE: This study tested a theoretical model exploring the moderating influence of psychological (emotion regulation) and interpersonal (social support) factors on the mediation between trauma and hypertension, through PTSD. METHODS: We measured these variables through self-reported questionnaire on 212 patients, recruited from internal medicine in a general hospital of Bukavu, a region affected by more than 25 years of armed conflicts. We first evaluated the PTSD mediation in the absence of moderators, before testing each moderator using moderated path analysis. RESULTS: Results showed that PTSD partially mediates the relationship between human-made trauma and hypertension, whereas social support and maladaptive emotion regulation moderate the relationship between human-made trauma and PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between human-made trauma, PTSD, and hypertension might be modulated by psychological and interpersonal factors, which paves the way for new interventions targeting emotion regulation and social support to reduce PTSD and hypertension in populations exposed to human-made violence.

Drug adherence and psychological factors in patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension: Yes but which ones?

The aim of the study was to assess drug adherence, as well as association of psychological factors with both drug adherence and severity of hypertension in two subtypes of patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension (ATRH): younger patients with uncomplicated hypertension (YURHTN) versus patients ≥60-year-old and/or with a history of cardio- or cerebrovascular complication (OCRHTN). Drug adherence was assessed in urine by targeted Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. The severity of hypertension was assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure adjusted for the number of antihypertensive drugs and for drug adherence. Psychological profile was assessed using five validated questionnaires. The proportion of totally non-adherent patients was three times higher (24.1 vs. 7.1%, P = 0.026) in the YURHTN (n = 54) than in OCRHTN subgroup (n = 43). Independent predictors of drug adherence in YURHTN were ability to use adaptive strategies, male sex and family history of hypertension, accounting for 39% of variability in drug adherence. In the same subgroup, independent predictors of severity of hypertension were somatization and lower recourse to planification, accounting for 40% of variability in the severity of hypertension. In contrast, in the OCRHTN subgroup, independent predictors of drug adherence and severity of hypertension were limited to the number of yearly admissions to the emergency room and the total number of prescribed drugs. In conclusion, poor drug adherence and altered psychological profiles appear to play a major role in younger patients with ATRH devoid of cardiovascular complication. This subgroup should be prioritized for chemical detection of drug adherence and psychological evaluation.

Psychological determinants of drug adherence and severity of hypertension in patients with apparently treatment-resistant vs. controlled hypertension.

PURPOSE: In a pilot study including 35 patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension (ATRH), we documented associations between psychological profile, drug adherence and severity of hypertension. The current study aims to confirm and expand our findings in a larger and more representative sample of patients with ATRH, using controlled hypertensive patients as the comparator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with ATRH were enrolled in hypertension centres from Brussels and Torino. The psychological profile was assessed using five validated questionnaires. Drug adherence was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of urine samples, and drug resistance by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was adjusted for drug adherence. RESULTS: The study sample totalised 144 patients, including 81 ATRH and 63 controlled hypertensive patients. The mean adherence level was significantly lower in the "resistant" group (78.9% versus 92.7% in controlled patients, p-value = .022). In patients with ATRH, independent predictors of poor drug adherence were somatisation, smoking and low acceptance level of difficult situations, accounting for 41% of the variability in drug adherence. Independent predictors of severity of hypertension were somatisation, smoking, more frequent admissions to the emergency department and low acceptation, accounting for 63% of the variability in the severity of hypertension. In contrast, in patients with controlled hypertension, the single predictors of either drug adherence or severity of hypertension were the number of years of hypertension and, for the severity of hypertension, alcohol consumption, accounting for only 15-20% of the variability. CONCLUSION: Psychological factors, mostly related to somatisation and expression of emotions are strong, independent predictors of both drug adherence and severity of hypertension in ATRH but not in controlled hypertensive patients.

This study included 144 patients with Apparently-Treatment Resistant (ATRH) or controlled Hypertension: Patients with ATRH were more often poorly adherent to antihypertensive treatment than controlled hypertensive patients.In patients with ARTH but not patients with controlled hypertension, psychological traits were strong, independent predictors of drug adherence and severity of hypertension, over and above demographic and health-related factors.In patients with ATRH, the tendency to somatize, i.e. expressing somatic symptoms that cannot be adequately explained by organic findings was the most potent predictor of both poor drug adherence and severity of hypertension.These patients also often presented alterations in the expression of emotions. It may be hypothesised that subjects who have difficulties identifying and expressing emotions with words will express them by physical complaints, and, in the mid-long term, might develop overt diseases.In addition to more classical lifestyle and drug management and irrespective of their drug adherence level, patients with ATRH may benefit in priority from psychological evaluation and interventions. However, this needs to be studied in an interventional trial in the future.

Impact of drug adherence on blood pressure response to alcohol-mediated renal denervation.

PURPOSE: While poor drug adherence is frequent in patients with resistant hypertension, detailed analyses of the impact of drug adherence on the success of renal denervation are scarce. We report drug adherence at baseline, changes in drug adherence, and the influence of these parameters on blood pressure changes at 6 and 12 months in patients treated with alcohol-mediated renal denervation as part of the Peregrine study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urinary detection of antihypertensive drugs was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Full adherence, partial adherence, and complete non-adherence were defined as 0, 1, or ≥2 drugs not detected, respectively. RESULTS: Renal denervation was performed in 45 patients with uncontrolled hypertension on ≥3 antihypertensive medications (62% men, age 55 ± 10 years). At baseline, the proportion of fully, partially, and non-adherent patients was 62% (n = 28), 16% (n = 7), and 22% (n = 10), respectively. At 6 months, adherence improved by 21% (n = 9), remained unchanged at 49% (n = 21), and worsened by 30% (n = 13). Mean 24-h systolic blood pressure decreased by 10 ± 13, 10 ± 4, and 14 ± 19 mmHg in fully, partially, and non-adherent patients (p = 0.77), and by 14 ± 14, 8 ± 11, and 14 ± 18 mmHg in patients who improved, maintained, or decreased adherence, respectively (p = 0.35). The results at 12 months were similar. CONCLUSION: About 40% of patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension were not fully adherent at baseline, and adherence decreased further in 30%. Nevertheless, mean blood pressure changes after renal denervation were similar irrespective of drug adherence. Our results suggest that such patients may benefit from alcohol-mediated renal denervation, irrespective of drug adherence. These findings are hypothesis-generating and need to be confirmed in ongoing sham-controlled trials.

Association between post-traumatic stress disorder and hypertension in Congolese exposed to violence: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Numerous risk factors have been involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension. The contribution of psychological factors, including post-traumatic stress disorder, remains largely underexplored, despite their potential role in hypertension. OBJECTIVES: We compared the prevalence of trauma, post-traumatic stress and other psychological disorders between hypertensive and normotensive patients from Bukavu (Democratic Republic of Congo), a 25-year war-exposed city. METHODS AND MEASURES: In this case-control study, we assessed past traumatic events with the Stressful-Events-Scale, post-traumatic stress disorder through the post-traumatic diagnostic scale, depression and alcohol use disorder through the MINI-International-Neuropsychiatric-Interview, and emotion regulation through the Emotion-Regulation-Questionnaire in 106 hypertensive and 106 normotensive patients, enrolled at the Bukavu General Hospital. RESULTS: Compared with normotensive controls (73% women, age: 43 ±â€Š14 years, BP: 121 ±â€Š10/75 ±â€Š8 mmHg), hypertensive patients (57% women, age: 42 ±â€Š13 years, BP: 141 ±â€Š12/82 ±â€Š7 mmHg, on a median of two antihypertensive drugs) were exposed to more man-made traumas (61 vs. 13%, P < 0.001), used more expressive suppression (P = 0.05) and less cognitive reappraisal (P = 0.02) as emotional regulation strategies. They developed more frequent post-traumatic stress disorder (36 vs. 7%, P < 0.001) and major depressive disorder (37 vs. 13%, P = 0.001), often in association with alcohol use disorder (23 vs. 4%, P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, post-traumatic stress disorder [OR = 3.52 (1.23-6.54)], man-made trauma [OR = 2.24 (1.15-4.12)], family history of hypertension [OR = 2.24 (1.06-4.44)], fasting blood glucose [OR = 1.85 (1.07-3.08)], BMI [OR = 1.28 (1.12-2.92)], expressive suppression [OR = 1.23 (1.11-2.23)] and cognitive reappraisal [OR = 0.76 (0.63-0.98)] were independent predictors of hypertension. CONCLUSION: In Congolese populations exposed to war, man-made trauma exposure and post-traumatic stress disorder appear to be more tightly related to hypertension than classical hypertension risk factors.

Adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment in kidney transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: Hypertension is a common cardiovascular co-morbidity after kidney transplantation and contributes to shortened graft and patient survival outcomes. However, by contrast with adherence to immunosuppressive drugs, adherence to antihypertensive treatment in kidney transplant recipients has been seldom explored. The aim of the current study was to assess adherence to antihypertensive drugs in kidney transplant recipients from the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and to look for demographic and clinical characteristics associated with drug adherence. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical files in a standardised case report form. Blood pressure was measured in the sitting position after 5 min rest, using validated oscillometric devices. Drug adherence was assessed by drug dosage in urine using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Our analysis included 53 kidney transplants recipients (75% of men, mean age: 57.2 ± 12.6 years, time since kidney transplantation: 9.5 ± 7.3 years, blood pressure: 130 ± 16/78 ± 11 mmHg on 2.1 ± 1.1 antihypertensive drugs). The proportion of patients showing full drug adherence, partial drug adherence, and total non-adherence to antihypertensive drugs was 79% (N = 42), 15% (N = 8), and 6% (N = 3), respectively. Adherent patients did not differ from less or non- adherers in any of the analysed characteristics. CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients adhering to antihypertensive drug treatment among kidney transplant recipients appears similar to that reported for immunosuppressive drugs in renal transplanted patients (∼70%), but much higher than that observed in patients with drug-resistant hypertension (30-40%). Our results need further confirmation in a large, multicenter, prospective cohort.

Efficacy and Safety of Armolipid Plus®: An Updated PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.

Armolipid Plus® is a multi-constituent nutraceutical that claims to improve lipid profiles. The aim of this PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was to globally evaluate the efficacy and safety of Armolipid Plus® on the basis of the available randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trials (RCTs). A systematic literature search in several databases was conducted in order to identify RCTs assessing the efficacy and safety of dietary supplementation with Armolipid Plus®. Two review authors independently identified 12 eligible studies (1050 included subjects overall) and extracted data on study characteristics, methods, and outcomes. Meta-analysis of the data suggested that dietary supplementation with Armolipid Plus® exerted a significant effect on body mass index (mean difference (MD) = -0.25 kg/m2, p = 0.008) and serum levels of total cholesterol (MD = -25.07 mg/dL, p < 0.001), triglycerides (MD = -11.47 mg/dL, p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD = 1.84 mg/dL, p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD = -26.67 mg/dL, p < 0.001), high sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP, MD = -0.61 mg/L, p = 0.022), and fasting glucose (MD = -3.52 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Armolipid Plus® was well tolerated. This meta-analysis demonstrates that dietary supplementation with Armolipid Plus® is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in serum lipids, glucose, and hs-CRP. These changes are consistent with improved cardiometabolic health.

Safety Evaluation of α-Lipoic Acid Supplementation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Studies.

Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is a natural short-chain fatty acid that has attracted great attention in recent years as an antioxidant molecule. However, some concerns have been recently raised regarding its safety profile. To address the issue, we aimed to assess ALA safety profile through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of the available randomized placebo-controlled clinical studies. The literature search included EMBASE, PubMed Medline, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and ISI Web of Science by Clarivate databases up to 15th August 2020. Data were pooled from 71 clinical studies, comprising 155 treatment arms, which included 4749 subjects with 2558 subjects treated with ALA and 2294 assigned to placebo. A meta-analysis of extracted data suggested that supplementation with ALA was not associated with an increased risk of any treatment-emergent adverse event (all p > 0.05). ALA supplementation was safe, even in subsets of studies categorized according to smoking habit, cardiovascular disease, presence of diabetes, pregnancy status, neurological disorders, rheumatic affections, severe renal impairment, and status of children/adolescents at baseline.

Benefit of serum drug monitoring complementing urine analysis to assess adherence to antihypertensive drugs in first-line therapy.

With obesity having doubled in the last decade, hypertension is on the rise. In one-third of hypertensive patients the metabolic syndrome is present. This might be one factor for the increasing number of prescriptions for angiotensin receptor blockers and calcium-channel blockers besides a more favorable risk-to-benefit ratio. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) method for assessment of adherence based on cut-offs in inpatients and to compare it to an established urine drug screening in outpatients. A method for quantification of calcium-channel blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric analysis (LC-MS/MS) was developed and validated. The method was applied to serum samples of 32 patients under supervised medication to establish cut-off values for adherence assessment based on dose-related concentrations (DRC, calculated from pharmacokinetic data). Furthermore, corresponding urine and blood samples of 42 outpatients without supervised medication were analysed and the results compared with regard to adherence assessment. All serum concentrations measured for amlodipine (n = 40), lercanidipine (n = 14), candesartan (n = 10), telmisartan (n = 4) and valsartan (n = 10) in inpatients were above the patient specific lower DRC confirming adherence. Of 42 outpatients the identification of analytes in urine as well as the quantification in serum exhibited differing results. According to urinalysis, adherence was demonstrated in only 87.0% of prescriptions, compared to 91.3% for serum analyses. Differences were observed for amlodipine, lercanidipine and candesartan which can be explained by a higher specificity of the serum analysis approach due to pharmacokinetics. The present study confirms that assessing adherence based on serum drug concentrations with individually calculated lower DRCs is more accurate than using qualitative urine analysis. In particular, drugs with low bioavailability, low renal excretion or high metabolism rate such as lercanidipine and candesartan may lead to underestimation of adherence via urine analysis.

Assessment of adherence to diuretics and ß-blockers by serum drug monitoring in comparison to urine analysis.

Purpose: Toxicological screenings for identifying antihypertensive drugs proved to be a useful tool for assessing adherence. However, misinterpretation may occur in case of highly metabolised drugs with low renal excretion, as well as for drugs with a prolonged detectability. The aim of the present study was to compare a recently developed therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) method based on serum concentrations to an urine drug detection method for assessing adherence in outpatients.Materials and methods: Corresponding urine and blood samples were obtained at the same time from 26 outpatients without supervised medication. Urine and serum analyses were performed using established high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methodologies. Adherence was assumed if drugs were detectable in urine or if serum concentrations were above individually calculated lower dose-related concentrations (DRC) or literature-based therapeutic reference ranges (TRR) used as cut-off, respectively.Results: The identification of analytes in urine as well as the quantitative serum assay were performed for atenolol (n = 6 patients), bisoprolol (n = 8), nebivolol (n = 6), canrenone (n = 6, metabolite of spironolactone), hydrochlorothiazide (n = 12) and furosemide (n = 2). On the basis of drug detectability in urine, adherence was assumed in 88% of prescriptions. In 81% (DRC) and 50% (TRR) of the serum analyses the cut-off value was exceeded, which confirms patients' adherence in a lower number. Differences in adherence rates were found in five patients, mainly for ß-blockers.Conclusion: This study suggests that assessment of adherence can be performed more precisely on the basis of serum drug concentrations with individually calculated lower DRC than by using the TRR or qualitative urinalysis.

Predictors of blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension after intensive management in two expert centres: the Brussels-Torino experience.

Background: Management of resistant hypertension (RHTN) is challenging and often implies the use of complex polypharmacy and interventional therapies. The main objectives of this study were (i) to describe the characteristics of patients with RHTN referred to two expert centres; (ii) to identify predictors of blood pressure (BP) control after intensive management. Methods: We reviewed electronic medical files of all patients referred for RHTN to the Brussels and Torino centres, and extracted detailed clinical data, informations on drug adherence and psychological profile. All patients with confirmed diagnosis of RHTN, according to office and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) measurements, were considered eligible. Results: 313 patients (51% men; age: 56 ± 12 years; office BP 177/98 mmHg; 24-hour ABPM 153/90 mmHg) were included. At the end of follow-up (median: 2 years [1-4]), only 26% of patients (n = 81) reached BP control. When compared to patients remaining resistant, patients eventually controlled had lower pulse pressure (71 vs. 82 mmHg, p < 0.001), less often myocardial infarction (6% vs. 20%, p < 0.005) and showed a higher recourse to cognitive reappraisal as far as emotion regulation is concerned (4.8 ± 1.1 vs. 3.9 ± 1.2, p = 0.009; ERQ Questionnaire). In a multivariate analysis looking for predictors of controlled BP, only the psychological characteristic of cognitive reappraisal (i.e., changing one's thoughts about a potentially emotion-eliciting event) remained significant (OR 2.06 [1.10; 3.84], p = 0.02). Conclusions: Even in expert centres, only a minority of patients with RHTN reached BP control, irrespective of the centre involved or the interventions applied. Patients who eventually responded to therapy had lower arterial stiffness and less cardiac organ damage. Furthermore, besides vascular damage, the single predictor of BP control was the ability to modify the emotional impact of stressful situations.

Adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment in patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension in the INSPiRED pilot study.

PURPOSE: Drug adherence may be a major problem in the therapy of hypertension and in the diagnosis of therapy resistance. Adherence can be assessed by indirect methods or by direct methods like drug detection in urine with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current analysis included patients with apparently treatment- resistant hypertension (TRH) referred for renal denervation (RDN) and included in the the INSPiRED pilot trial (NCT01505010). Adherence was repeatedly assessed by toxicological urine analysis over a time range of up to 17 months in a total of 18 patients. RESULTS: In the first urine samples of 18 patients the adherence rate (percentage of number of detected vs. prescribed medical drugs) ranged from 0 to 100% with a median of 73.2%. In further urine samples collected during the following up to 17 months every individual patient exhibited considerable changes in the adherence rate, neither a constancy nor a tendency could be deduced. CONCLUSIONS: Urine analysis results exhibit variation over time and an assessment at a certain time point cannot be regarded as representative or predictor for future behavior. Therefore, it appears necessary to perform drug adherence testing repeatedly over time.

Impact of psychological profile on drug adherence and drug resistance in patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension.

PURPOSE: Patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (a-TRH) are often poorly adherent to drug treatment and have an unusual personal history and psychological profile. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of drug adherence and drug resistance in a cohort of patients with aTRH, with emphasis on psychological characteristics. METHODS: All patients with confirmed aTRH on standardized antihypertensive treatment were eligible. Drug adherence was assessed by drug dosages in urine using Liquid Chromatography coupled with tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Drug resistance was assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure adjusted for the number of antihypertensive drugs and for drug adherence. Psychological profile was assessed using a broad array of validated questionnaires. RESULTS: The analysis included 35 consecutive patients. The proportion of adherent, partly adherent and totally non-adherent patients was 29, 40 and 31%, respectively. In regression analysis, independent predictors of poor drug adherence were recent hospital admission for hypertension, a lower ability to put things into perspective when facing negative events and a higher tendency to somatize, accounting for 51% of variability in drug adherence. Independent predictors of treatment resistance were a higher recourse to the strategies of blaming others and oneself, accounting for 37% of variability in drug treatment resistance. CONCLUSION: In patients with aTRH, poor adherence is frequent but does not entirely account for treatment resistance. Psychological characteristics appear as strong predictors of both drug adherence and drug resistance. Our results suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring and psychological evaluation should be an integral part of assessment of patients with aTRH.